Cited by 38Phonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchMusic and Audio Processing

Listen2Cough: Leveraging End-to-End Deep Learning Cough Detection Model to Enhance Lung Health Assessment Using Passively Sensed Audio

Xu, Xuhai, Nemati, Ebrahim, Vatanparvar, Korosh, Nathan, Viswam, Ahmed, Tousif, Rahman, Md Mahbubur, McCaffrey, Daniel, Kuang, Jilong +1 more·2021·Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Abstract

The prevalence of ubiquitous computing enables new opportunities for lung health monitoring and assessment. In the past few years, there have been extensive studies on cough detection using passively sensed audio signals. However, the generalizability of a cough detection model when applied to external datasets, especially in real-world implementation, is questionable and not explored adequately. Beyond detecting coughs, researchers have looked into how cough sounds can be used in assessing lung health. However, due to the challenges in collecting both cough sounds and lung health condition ground truth, previous studies have been hindered by the limited datasets. In this paper, we propose Listen2Cough to address these gaps. We first build an end-to-end deep learning architecture using public cough sound datasets to detect coughs within raw audio recordings. We employ a pre-trained MobileNet and integrate a number of augmentation techniques to improve the generalizability of our model. Without additional fine-tuning, our model is able to achieve an F1 score of 0.948 when tested against a new clean dataset, and 0.884 on another in-the-wild noisy dataset, leading to an advantage of 5.8% and 8.4% on average over the best baseline model, respectively. Then, to mitigate the issue of limited lung health data, we propose to transform the cough detection task to lung health assessment tasks so that the rich cough data can be leveraged. Our hypothesis is that these tasks extract and utilize similar effective representation from cough sounds. We embed the cough detection model into a multi-instance learning framework with the attention mechanism and further tune the model for lung health assessment tasks. Our final model achieves an F1-score of 0.912 on healthy v.s. unhealthy, 0.870 on obstructive v.s. non-obstructive, and 0.813 on COPD v.s. asthma classification, outperforming the baseline by 10.7%, 6.3%, and 3.7%, respectively. Moreover, the weight value in the attention layer can be used to identify important coughs highly correlated with lung health, which can potentially provide interpretability for expert diagnosis in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3448124

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A pre-trained CNN MobileNet detects respiratory disease with F1 scores of 0.912 for healthy versus unhealthy, 0.870 for obstructive versus non-obstructive, and 0.813 for COPD versus asthma.

    “A pre-trained CNN based network of MobileNet is employed to detect respiratory disease, and achieves an F1 score of 0.912 on healthy versus unhealthy, 0.870 on obstructive versus non-obstructive and 0.813 on COPD versus asthma classification [74].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, X., Nemati, E., Vatanparvar, K., Nathan, V., Ahmed, T., Rahman, M. M., McCaffrey, D., Kuang, J., & Gao, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Digital Health Lab, Samsung Research America, Mountain View, CA
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2021-03-19
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139752690
Cited by
38
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
cough detection, MobileNet, data augmentation, multiple instance learning, attention mechanism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, obstructive lung disease, noisy audio, interpretability, wearable health monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review