Cited by 52Political Conflict and GovernancePeacebuilding and International SecurityQualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Forecasting Civil Wars: Theory and Structure in an Age of “Big Data” and Machine Learning

Blair, Robert A., Sambanis, Nicholas·2020·Journal of Conflict Resolution

Abstract

Does theory contribute to forecasting accuracy? We use event data to show that a parsimonious model grounded in prominent theories of conflict escalation can forecast civil war onset with high accuracy and over shorter temporal windows than has generally been possible. Our forecasting model draws on “procedural” variables, building on insights from the contentious politics literature. We show that a procedural model outperforms more inductive, atheoretical alternatives and also outperforms models based on countries’ structural characteristics, which previously dominated models of civil war onset. We find that process can substitute for structure over short forecasting windows. We also find a more direct connection between theory and forecasting than is sometimes assumed, though we suggest that future researchers treat the value-added of theory for prediction not as an assumption but rather as a hypothesis to test.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022002720918923

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blair and Sambanis's test dataset has only 11 instances of civil war onset.

    “As an illustration, we examine this issue in detail in the case of Blair and Sambanis86 because their test dataset has a particularly small number of instances of civil war onset (only 11).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blair, R. A., & Sambanis, N.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Blair, Robert A.
Venue
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
1885-1915
ISSN
  • 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8766
OpenAlex
W3017867703
Cited by
52
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Political Instability Task Force
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Keywords
civil war onset, conflict prediction, procedural variables, contentious politics, structural properties, machine learning, big data, short-term forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review