Cited by 6ICT in Developing CommunitiesICT Impact and PoliciesFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Poster: Lessons from Doing Fieldwork with Bandwidth-constrained communities Online

Open access
Till, Sarina, Densmore, Melissa, Coleman, Toshka Lauren, Dias, Nervo Verdezoto·2021·ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies

Abstract

research-article Open AccessPoster: Lessons from Doing Fieldwork with Bandwidth-constrained communities Online Share on Authors: Sarina Till University of Cape Town and Independent Institute of Education, South Africa University of Cape Town and Independent Institute of Education, South AfricaView Profile , Melissa Densmore University of Cape Town, South Africa University of Cape Town, South AfricaView Profile , Toshka Lauren Coleman University of Cape Town, South Africa University of Cape Town, South AfricaView Profile , Nervo Verdezoto Dias Cardiff University, South Africa Cardiff University, South AfricaView Profile Authors Info & Claims COMPASS '21: ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable SocietiesJune 2021 Pages 445–448https://doi.org/10.1145/3460112.3471979Online:23 September 2021Publication History 0citation50DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations0Total Downloads50Last 12 Months50Last 6 weeks20 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteView all FormatsPDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3460112.3471979

Cites

8 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Alison Castro Superfine. 2020. Conducting research in the time of pandemic: A pause or an opportunity? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 23, 5 (Oct. 2020), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09478-w · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Till, S., Densmore, M., Coleman, T. L., & Dias, N. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
Publisher
ACM
Published
2021-06-28
Pages
445-448
OpenAlex
W3204286709
Cited by
6
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • UKRI (Ref: EP/T030429/1)
  • UKRI GCRF Digital Innovation for Development in Africa (DIDA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
virtual fieldwork, remote fieldwork, digital divide, research ethics, participatory research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review