Cited by 30Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchCareer Development and Diversity

The pushback effects of race, ethnicity, gender, and age in code review

Open access
Murphy-Hill, Emerson, Jaspan, Ciera, Egelman, Carolyn, Cheng, Lan·2022·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Research shows that White, male, and younger engineers receive less pushback than those in other demographics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3474097

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Egelman, C.D., Murphy-Hill, E., Kammer, E., Hodges, M.M., Green, C., Jaspan, C., and Lin, J. Pushback: Characterizing and detecting negative interpersonal interactions in code review. Intern. Conf. on Software Engineering (2020), 174-185.
  2. Murphy-Hill, E., Dicker, J., Hodges, M., Egelman, C.D., Jaspan, C.N.C., Cheng, L., Kammer, L., Holtz, B., Jorde, M.A., Dolan, A.M.K., and Green, C. Engineering impacts of anonymous author code review: A field experiment. Trans. on Software Engineering. (To appear).
  3. Nadri, R., Rodriguez-Perez, G., and Nagappan, M. On the relationship between the developer's perceptible race and ethnicity and the evaluation of contributions in OSS. Trans. on Software Engineering. (To appear).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy-Hill, E., Jaspan, C., Egelman, C., & Cheng, L.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2022-02-23
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
52-57
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W4212872938
Cited by
30
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
code review, pushbacks, race, ethnicity, gender, age, demographic bias, software engineering, diversity in computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review