Cited by 74Technology Use by Older AdultsDesign Education and PracticeInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Co-design with older adults: examining and reflecting on collaboration with aging communities

Sakaguchi-Tang, Dawn K., Cunningham, Jay L., Roldan, Wendy, Yip, Jason, Kientz, Julie A.·2021·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Co-design methods have involved older adults in the design process to fill the knowledge gap that younger adult designers might encounter when designing for an aging population. A focus of co-design means establishing equal and equitable relationships between users and designers. To understand the factors that contribute to equal collaborations between older adults and student designers, we conducted 12 co-design sessions with 16 older adults and 11 student designers. We examined their interactions by adapting a framework initially aimed to understand the child-adult design partnership. We also analyzed student designers' reflections to understand their experiences and learnings from designing with older adults. Our findings demonstrate that developing a design partnership is complex. The framework helped surface factors like sharing life experiences and role ownership that influenced balanced or unbalanced interactions. Through the student designers' reflections, we found that student designers identified challenges they encountered and the assumptions they had about the older adult population. We believe that immersing students in a co-design experience with older adults and leveraging reflection activities provides an educational and meaningful experience to the design students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3479506

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults are essential stakeholders in the design of social robot systems and contribute immense value to the design of these technologies due to their lived experiences and ability to create interactions tailored to their lives.

    “Older adults are essential stakeholders in the design of social robot systems and contribute immense value to the design of these technologies due to their lived experiences and ability to create interactions tailored to their lives (Ostrowski et al., 2021b; Sakaguchi-Tang et al., 2021).”

    From Promising directions for human-robot interactions defined by older adults (2024) · cites this paper as Sakaguchi-Tang et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakaguchi-Tang, D. K., Cunningham, J. L., Roldan, W., Yip, J., & Kientz, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2021-10-13
Volume
5
Issue
CSCW2
Pages
1-28
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3206094771
Cited by
74
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE 1256082)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
co-design, older adults, design for aging, design partnerships, student designers, design education, reflective activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review