CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130Child Development and Digital TechnologyTeaching and Learning ProgrammingLiteracy, Media, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Family as a Third Space for AI Literacies: How do children and parents learn about AI together?

Open access
Druga, Stefania, Christoph, Fee Lia, Ko, Amy J·2022·CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DOI 10.1145/3491102.3502031
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Many families engage daily with artificial intelligence (AI) applications, from conversations with a voice assistant to mobile navigation searches. While there are known ways for youth to learn about AI, we do not yet understand how to engage parents in this process. To explore parents’ roles in helping their children develop AI literacies, we designed 11 learning activities organized into four topics: image classification, object recognition, interaction with voice assistants, and unplugged AI co-design. We conducted a 5-week online in-home study with 18 children (5 to 11 years old) and 16 parents. We identify parents’ most common roles in supporting their children and consider the benefits of parent-child partnerships when learning AI literacies. Finally, we discuss how our different activities supported parents’ roles and present design recommendations for future family-centered AI literacies resources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3491102.3502031

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. [n.d.]. Echo Kids Privacy – Echo Dot Kids Edition Privacy Concerns and COPPA Violations Site. https://www.echokidsprivacy.com/. (Accessed on 08/31/2021). [n.d.]. Echo Kids Privacy – Echo Dot Kids Edition Privacy Concerns and COPPA Violations Site. https://www.echokidsprivacy.com/. (Accessed on 08/31/2021).
  2. Edith Ackermann . 1991. The agency model of transactions: Toward an understanding of children’s theory of control. Psychologie genetique et sciences cognitives . Geneve : Fondation Archives Jean Piaget ( 1991 ). Edith Ackermann. 1991. The agency model of transactions: Toward an understanding of children’s theory of control. Psychologie genetique et sciences cognitives. Geneve: Fondation Archives Jean Piaget (1991).
  3. Jose M Alonso . 2019 . Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Kids. In 2019 Conference of the International Fuzzy Systems Association and the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT 2019). Atlantis Press. Jose M Alonso. 2019. Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Kids. In 2019 Conference of the International Fuzzy Systems Association and the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT 2019). Atlantis Press.
  4. Julia Angwin , Jeff Larson , Surya Mattu , and Lauren Kirchner . 2016. Machine bias. ProPublica , May 23(2016) , 2016 . Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias. ProPublica, May 23(2016), 2016.
  5. A Antle . 2007 . Tangibles: five properties to consider for children . In Workshop on Tangibles at Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007). 1–10. A Antle. 2007. Tangibles: five properties to consider for children. In Workshop on Tangibles at Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007). 1–10.
  6. Rachel Barr . 2019. Growing up in the digital age: early learning and family media ecology. Current directions in psychological science 28, 4 ( 2019 ), 341–346. Rachel Barr. 2019. Growing up in the digital age: early learning and family media ecology. Current directions in psychological science 28, 4 (2019), 341–346.
  7. Mark Bauerlein . 2011. The Digital Divide: Arguments for and Against Facebook , Google, Texting, and the Age of Social Netwo rking . Penguin . Mark Bauerlein. 2011. The Digital Divide: Arguments for and Against Facebook, Google, Texting, and the Age of Social Netwo rking. Penguin.
  8. 10.1145/3290605.3300473 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke . 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 ( 2006 ), 77–101. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
  10. Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru . 2018 . Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification . In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. 77–91 . Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. 77–91.
  11. Courtney Cazden , Bill Cope , Norman Fairclough , Jim Gee , Mary Kalantzis , Gunther Kress , Allan Luke , Carmen Luke , Sarah Michaels , and Martin Nakata . 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review 66, 1 ( 1996 ), 60–92. Courtney Cazden, Bill Cope, Norman Fairclough, Jim Gee, Mary Kalantzis, Gunther Kress, Allan Luke, Carmen Luke, Sarah Michaels, and Martin Nakata. 1996. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review 66, 1 (1996), 60–92.
  12. Luigi Ceccaroni , James Bibby , Erin Roger , Paul Flemons , Katina Michael , Laura Fagan , and Jessica L Oliver . 2019. Opportunities and risks for citizen science in the age of artificial intelligence. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4, 1 ( 2019 ). Luigi Ceccaroni, James Bibby, Erin Roger, Paul Flemons, Katina Michael, Laura Fagan, and Jessica L Oliver. 2019. Opportunities and risks for citizen science in the age of artificial intelligence. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4, 1 (2019).
  13. Stefania Druga and Rebecca Michelson . 2020. Research Toolkit for Family Speculative Play with Future Toys. Special Issue on Designing the future of technology with and for children ( 2020 ), 39. Stefania Druga and Rebecca Michelson. 2020. Research Toolkit for Family Speculative Play with Future Toys. Special Issue on Designing the future of technology with and for children (2020), 39.
  14. Catherine D’Ignazio and Rahul Bhargava . 2015 . Approaches to building big data literacy . In Proceedings of the Bloomberg data for good exchange conference. Catherine D’Ignazio and Rahul Bhargava. 2015. Approaches to building big data literacy. In Proceedings of the Bloomberg data for good exchange conference.
  15. Yrjö Engeström . 2015. Learning by expanding . Cambridge University Press . Yrjö Engeström. 2015. Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Thomas Erickson . 1997. Designing agents as if people mattered. Software agents ( 1997 ), 79–96. Thomas Erickson. 1997. Designing agents as if people mattered. Software agents (1997), 79–96.
  17. Joshua Grossman , Zhiyuan Lin , Hao Sheng , Johnny T-Z Wei , Joseph J Williams, and Sharad Goel. 2019 . MathBot: Transforming Online Resources for Learning Math into Conversational Interactions . (2019). Joshua Grossman, Zhiyuan Lin, Hao Sheng, Johnny T-Z Wei, Joseph J Williams, and Sharad Goel. 2019. MathBot: Transforming Online Resources for Learning Math into Conversational Interactions. (2019).
  18. Kris Gutierrez , Betsy Rymes , and Joanne Larson . 1995. Script , counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard educational review 65, 3 ( 1995 ), 445–472. Kris Gutierrez, Betsy Rymes, and Joanne Larson. 1995. Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard educational review 65, 3 (1995), 445–472.
  19. Kris D Gutiérrez . 2008. Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading research quarterly 43, 2 ( 2008 ), 148–164. Kris D Gutiérrez. 2008. Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading research quarterly 43, 2 (2008), 148–164.
  20. Kris D Gutiérrez , P Zitlali Morales , and Danny C Martinez . 2009. Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of research in education 33, 1 ( 2009 ), 212–245. Kris D Gutiérrez, P Zitlali Morales, and Danny C Martinez. 2009. Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of research in education 33, 1 (2009), 212–245.
  21. Kris D Gutiérrez and Barbara Rogoff . 2003. Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational researcher 32, 5 ( 2003 ), 19–25. Kris D Gutiérrez and Barbara Rogoff. 2003. Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational researcher 32, 5 (2003), 19–25.
  22. Jerome Kirk , Marc L Miller , and Marc L Miller . 1986. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Vol. 1 . Sage . Jerome Kirk, Marc L Miller, and Marc L Miller. 1986. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Vol. 1. Sage.
  23. Sharona T Levy and David Mioduser . 2008. Does it ”want ” or ”was it programmed to...”? Kindergarten children’s explanations of an autonomous robot’s adaptive functioning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 18, 4( 2008 ), 337–359. Sharona T Levy and David Mioduser. 2008. Does it ”want” or ”was it programmed to...”? Kindergarten children’s explanations of an autonomous robot’s adaptive functioning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 18, 4(2008), 337–359.
  24. Annabel Lindner , Stefan Seegerer , and Ralf Romeike . 2019 . Unplugged Activities in the Context of AI. In International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives. Springer, 123–135 . Annabel Lindner, Stefan Seegerer, and Ralf Romeike. 2019. Unplugged Activities in the Context of AI. In International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives. Springer, 123–135.
  25. Sonia Livingstone , Mariya Stoilova , and Rishita Nandagiri . 2018 . Children’s data and privacy online . Technology 58 , 2 (2018), 157 – 165 . Sonia Livingstone, Mariya Stoilova, and Rishita Nandagiri. 2018. Children’s data and privacy online. Technology 58, 2 (2018), 157–165.
  26. Duri Long , Takeria Blunt , and Brian Magerko . 2021 . Co-Designing AI Literacy Exhibits for Informal Learning Spaces. CSCW ’21 : ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (23 10 2021). Duri Long, Takeria Blunt, and Brian Magerko. 2021. Co-Designing AI Literacy Exhibits for Informal Learning Spaces. CSCW ’21: ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (23 10 2021).
  27. Matthew B Miles and A Michael Huberman . 1984. Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational researcher 13, 5 ( 1984 ), 20–30. Matthew B Miles and A Michael Huberman. 1984. Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational researcher 13, 5 (1984), 20–30.
  28. Peter Nikken and Jeroen Jansz . 2006. Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, media and technology 31, 2 ( 2006 ), 181–202. Peter Nikken and Jeroen Jansz. 2006. Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, media and technology 31, 2 (2006), 181–202.
  29. Philip Oltermann . 2017. German parents told to destroy doll that can spy on children. The Guardian ( 2017 ). Philip Oltermann. 2017. German parents told to destroy doll that can spy on children. The Guardian (2017).
  30. Blakeley H Payne . 2019 . An ethics of artificial intelligence curriculum for middle school students. MIT Media Lab Personal Robots Group . Retrieved Oct 10 (2019), 2019 . Blakeley H Payne. 2019. An ethics of artificial intelligence curriculum for middle school students. MIT Media Lab Personal Robots Group. Retrieved Oct 10 (2019), 2019.
  31. Tom Pringle and Eden Zoller . 2018 . How to achieve AI maturity and why it matters . Ovum , June (2018), Available on Internet : https://www.amdocs.com (22/02/2019) (2018). Tom Pringle and Eden Zoller. 2018. How to achieve AI maturity and why it matters. Ovum, June (2018), Available on Internet: https://www.amdocs.com (22/02/2019) (2018).
  32. Heleen Rutjes , Martijn Willemsen , and Wijnand I Jsselsteijn . 2019. Considerations on explainable aI and users ’ mental models. ( 2019 ). Heleen Rutjes, Martijn Willemsen, and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2019. Considerations on explainable aI and users’ mental models. (2019).
  33. Anna Smith . 2021. From Mimeographs to New Learning Ecologies . In Critical Digital Literacies: Boundary-Crossing Practices . Brill , 224–230. Anna Smith. 2021. From Mimeographs to New Learning Ecologies. In Critical Digital Literacies: Boundary-Crossing Practices. Brill, 224–230.
  34. Statista. 2019. Digital assistant and voice assistant adoption 2019 . (2019). Statista. 2019. Digital assistant and voice assistant adoption 2019. (2019).
  35. Mike van Duuren and Michael Scaife . 1995. How do children represent intelligent technology?European Journal of Psychology of Education 10, 3 ( 1995 ), 289–301. Mike van Duuren and Michael Scaife. 1995. How do children represent intelligent technology?European Journal of Psychology of Education 10, 3 (1995), 289–301.
  36. Henriikka Vartiainen , Matti Tedre , and Teemu Valtonen . 2020. Learning machine learning with very young children: Who is teaching whom?International journal of child-computer interaction 25 (Sept . 2020 ), 100182. Henriikka Vartiainen, Matti Tedre, and Teemu Valtonen. 2020. Learning machine learning with very young children: Who is teaching whom?International journal of child-computer interaction 25 (Sept. 2020), 100182.
  37. Sara Vogel , Christopher Hoadley , Ana Rebeca Castillo , and Laura Ascenzi-Moreno . 2020. Languages , literacies and literate programming: can we use the latest theories on how bilingual people learn to help us teach computational literacies?Computer Science Education 30, 4 ( 2020 ), 420–443. Sara Vogel, Christopher Hoadley, Ana Rebeca Castillo, and Laura Ascenzi-Moreno. 2020. Languages, literacies and literate programming: can we use the latest theories on how bilingual people learn to help us teach computational literacies?Computer Science Education 30, 4 (2020), 420–443.
  38. Anna-Lisa Vollmer , Robin Read , Dries Trippas , and Tony Belpaeme . 2018. Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity. Science Robotics 3, 21 ( 2018 ), eaat7111. Anna-Lisa Vollmer, Robin Read, Dries Trippas, and Tony Belpaeme. 2018. Children conform, adults resist: A robot group induced peer pressure on normative social conformity. Science Robotics 3, 21 (2018), eaat7111.
  39. Lev Vygotsky . 1978. Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children 23, 3 ( 1978 ), 34–41. Lev Vygotsky. 1978. Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children 23, 3 (1978), 34–41.
  40. Lawrence J Walker , Karl H Hennig , and Tobias Krettenauer . 2000. Parent and peer contexts for children’s moral reasoning development. Child development 71, 4 ( 2000 ), 1033–1048. Lawrence J Walker, Karl H Hennig, and Tobias Krettenauer. 2000. Parent and peer contexts for children’s moral reasoning development. Child development 71, 4 (2000), 1033–1048.
  41. Mark Warschauer and Morgan Ames. 2010. Can One Laptop per Child save the world’s poor?Journal of international affairs(2010) 33–51. Mark Warschauer and Morgan Ames. 2010. Can One Laptop per Child save the world’s poor?Journal of international affairs(2010) 33–51.
  42. 10.1145/3313831.3376130 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 130

Related

Metadata

Authors
Druga, S., Christoph, F. L., & Ko, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
ORCID
Venue
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-04-29
Pages
1-17
DOI
10.1145/3491102.3502031
OpenAlex
W4225000370
Cited by
130
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5
FWCI
169.40
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Adobe Systems
  • NSF (National Science Foundation) (1539179, 1703304, 1836813, 2031265, 2100296, 2122950, 2137834, 2137312)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
AI literacy, family learning, parent-child partnership, voice assistants, image classification, object recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review