Cited by 918Teaching and Learning ProgrammingArtificial Intelligence in EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI?

Open access
Touretzky, David, Gardner-McCune, Christina, Martin, Fred, Seehorn, Deborah·2019·Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The ubiquity of AI in society means the time is ripe to consider what educated 21st century digital citizens should know about this subject. In May 2018, the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) and the Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) formed a joint working group to develop national guidelines for teaching AI to K-12 students. Inspired by CSTA's national standards for K-12 computing education, the AI for K-12 guidelines will define what students in each grade band should know about artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics. The AI for K-12 working group is also creating an online resource directory where teachers can find AI- related videos, demos, software, and activity descriptions they can incorporate into their lesson plans. This blue sky talk invites the AI research community to reflect on the big ideas in AI that every K-12 student should know, and how we should communicate with the public about advances in AI and their future impact on society. It is a call to action for more AI researchers to become AI educators, creating resources that help teachers and students understand our work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). 2018. AAAI Launches 'AI for K-12' Initiative in Collaboration with the Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) and AI4All [Press release]. Retrieved from https://aaai.org/Pressroom/Releases/release-18-0515.php
  2. Baloch, H.: Crompton, H.; Gerl, M.; Harrison, S.; Law, D.; McGirt, F.; Ramos, Y.; and South, J. 2018. Artificial Intelligence Goes to School . Retrieved from https://conference.iste.org/2018/program/search/detail\_session.php ?id=110888525
  3. Burgsteiner, H.; Kandlhofer, M.; and Steinbauer, G. 2016. IRobot: Teaching the Basics of Artificial Intelligence in High Schools. Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence . Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press.
  4. Dodds, Z.; Hirsh, H.; and Wagstaff, K. 2008. AI Education Colloquium . Technical Report & AI Education Workshop Papers WS-08-02. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California. https://aaai.org/Library/Workshops/ws08-02.php
  5. Druga, S.; Vu, S.; Likhith, E.; Oh, L.; Qui, T.; and Breazeal, C. (2018) Cognimates . https://cognimates.me Heinze, C.; Haase, J.; and Higgins, J. 2010. An Action Research Report from a Multi-Year Approach to Teaching Artificial Intelligence at the K-6 Level. First AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence . AAAI Press.
  6. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). 2018. Bold New Program Helps Teachers and Students Explore the Power of AI [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/explore/articleDetail?articleid=2229
  7. K-12 Computer Science Framework Steering Committee. 2016 . K12 Computer Science Framework. Technical Report. ACM, New York, NY, USA. Retrieved from https://k12cs.org/
  8. Resnick, M.; Bruckman, A.; and Martin, F. 1996. Pianos not stereos: Creating computational construction kits. Interactions , 3(5), 40-50.
  9. Touretzky, D. 2017. Computational thinking and mental models: From Kodu to Calypso. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Blocks & Beyond Workshop , Raleigh, NC, October 10, 2017.
  10. Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. 2005. Understanding by Design . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2019-07-17
Volume
33
Issue
01
Pages
9795-9799
ISSN
  • 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-3468
OpenAlex
W2965058023
Cited by
918
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 197 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 117 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 7
FWCI
54.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, K-12 education, machine learning education, robotics education, digital citizenship, public understanding of AI, teacher resources, societal impact of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review