CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 152Innovative Human-Technology InteractionDisability Rights and RepresentationAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 149 of the 156 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 7 are not checked yet.

ADHD and Technology Research – Investigated by Neurodivergent Readers

Open access
Spiel, Katta, Hornecker, Eva, Williams, Rua Mae, Good, Judith·2022·CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DOI 10.1145/3491102.3517592
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Technology research for neurodivergent conditions is largely shaped by research aims which privilege neuro-normative outcomes. As such, there is an epistemic imbalance in meaning making about these technologies. We conducted a critical literature review of technologies designed for people with ADHD, focusing on how ADHD is framed, the research aims and approaches, the role of people with ADHD within the research process, and the types of systems being developed within Computing and HCI. Our analysis and review is conducted explicitly from an insider perspective, bringing our perspectives as neurodivergent researchers to the topic of technologies in the context of ADHD. We found that 1) technologies are largely used to ‘mitigate’ the experiences of ADHD which are perceived as disruptive to neurotypical standards of behaviour; 2) little HCI research in the area invites this population to co-construct the technologies or to leverage neurodivergent experiences in the construction of research aims; and 3) participant resistance to deficit frames can be read within the researchers’ own accounts of participant actions. We discuss the implications of this status quo for disabled people and technology researchers alike, and close with a set of recommendations for future work in this area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3491102.3517592

Cites

149 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 150 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Ashwag Al-Shathri , Areej Al-Wabil , and Yousef Al-Ohali . 2013. Eye-Controlled Games for Behavioral Therapy of Attention Deficit Disorders . In HCI International 2013 - Posters ’ Extended Abstracts, Constantine Stephanidis (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg , Berlin, Heidelberg, 574–578. Ashwag Al-Shathri, Areej Al-Wabil, and Yousef Al-Ohali. 2013. Eye-Controlled Games for Behavioral Therapy of Attention Deficit Disorders. In HCI International 2013 - Posters’ Extended Abstracts, Constantine Stephanidis (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 574–578.
  2. Jared David Berezin . 2014. Disabled capital: A narrative of attention deficit disorder in the classroom through the lens of Bourdieu’s capital. Disability Studies Quarterly 34, 4 ( 2014 ). Jared David Berezin. 2014. Disabled capital: A narrative of attention deficit disorder in the classroom through the lens of Bourdieu’s capital. Disability Studies Quarterly 34, 4 (2014).
  3. K Birth . 2017. Time Blind . Springer . K Birth. 2017. Time Blind. Springer.
  4. Emma A Climie and Sarah M Mastoras . 2015. ADHD in schools: Adopting a strengths-based perspective.Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne 56, 3 ( 2015 ), 295. Emma A Climie and Sarah M Mastoras. 2015. ADHD in schools: Adopting a strengths-based perspective.Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne 56, 3 (2015), 295.
  5. Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan . 2008. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health.Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne 49, 3 ( 2008 ), 182. Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2008. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health.Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne 49, 3 (2008), 182.
  6. Michel Foucault . 1975. Discipline and punish. A. Sheridan , Tr., Paris, FR , Gallimard( 1975 ). Michel Foucault. 1975. Discipline and punish. A. Sheridan, Tr., Paris, FR, Gallimard(1975).
  7. Aimi Hamraie and Kelly Fritsch . 2019 . Crip technoscience manifesto. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory , Technoscience 5 , 1 (2019), 1 – 33 . Aimi Hamraie and Kelly Fritsch. 2019. Crip technoscience manifesto. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5, 1 (2019), 1–33.
  8. Donna Haraway . 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies 14, 3 ( 1988 ), 575–599. Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies 14, 3 (1988), 575–599.
  9. John C Hill and Eugene P Schoener. 1996. Age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.The American Journal of Psychiatry(1996). John C Hill and Eugene P Schoener. 1996. Age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.The American Journal of Psychiatry(1996).
  10. Alison Kafer . 2013. Feminist , queer, crip . Indiana University Press . Alison Kafer. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
  11. Alison Kafer . 2019. Crip kin, manifesting. Catalyst: Feminism, theory, technoscience 5, 1 ( 2019 ), 1–37. Alison Kafer. 2019. Crip kin, manifesting. Catalyst: Feminism, theory, technoscience 5, 1 (2019), 1–37.
  12. JR Martin . 2005. 12 Close reading: functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives ( 2005 ), 275. JR Martin. 2005. 12 Close reading: functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives (2005), 275.
  13. Robert McRuer . 2006 . Crip Theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. Vol. 9 . NYU press . Robert McRuer. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. Vol. 9. NYU press.
  14. Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha. 2018. Care work: Dreaming disability justice. arsenal pulp press Vancouver. Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha. 2018. Care work: Dreaming disability justice. arsenal pulp press Vancouver.
  15. Victoria Powell , Sharifah Shameem Agha , Rhys Bevan Jones , Olga Eyre , Anita Thapar , and Frances Rice . 2021. ADHD in adults with recurrent depression. medRxiv ( 2021 ). Victoria Powell, Sharifah Shameem Agha, Rhys Bevan Jones, Olga Eyre, Anita Thapar, and Frances Rice. 2021. ADHD in adults with recurrent depression. medRxiv (2021).
  16. Donna Reeve . 2004. Psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and the social model. Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research ( 2004 ), 83–100. Donna Reeve. 2004. Psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and the social model. Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (2004), 83–100.
  17. 10.5555/2500753.2500785 · DOI
  18. Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist , Nick Chown , and Anna Stenning . 2020. Neurodiversity studies: A new critical paradigm . Routledge . Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Nick Chown, and Anna Stenning. 2020. Neurodiversity studies: A new critical paradigm. Routledge.
  19. Ellen Samuels . 2017. Six ways of looking at crip time. Disability Studies Quarterly 37, 3 ( 2017 ). Ellen Samuels. 2017. Six ways of looking at crip time. Disability Studies Quarterly 37, 3 (2017).
  20. H Sharpe , Y Rogers , and J Preece . 2007. Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction 2 nd ed. H Sharpe, Y Rogers, and J Preece. 2007. Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction 2nd ed.
  21. Jim Sinclair . 2013. Why I dislike “person first ” language. Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies 1, 2( 2013 ). Jim Sinclair. 2013. Why I dislike “person first” language. Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies 1, 2(2013).
  22. Joseph A Stramondo . 2019. The distinction between curative and assistive technology. Science and engineering ethics 25, 4 ( 2019 ), 1125–1145. Joseph A Stramondo. 2019. The distinction between curative and assistive technology. Science and engineering ethics 25, 4 (2019), 1125–1145.
  23. Nick Walker . 2014 . Neurodiversity: Some basic terms & definitions. Neurocosmopolitanism RSS 27 (2014). Nick Walker. 2014. Neurodiversity: Some basic terms & definitions. Neurocosmopolitanism RSS 27 (2014).
  24. Rua M Williams and Juan E Gilbert . 2019. ’Nothing about us without us’: Transforming participatory research and ethics in human systems engineering. Advancing Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice Through Human Systems Engineering ( 2019 ), 9. Rua M Williams and Juan E Gilbert. 2019. ’Nothing about us without us’: Transforming participatory research and ethics in human systems engineering. Advancing Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice Through Human Systems Engineering (2019), 9.
  25. Langdon Winner . 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics?Daedalus 109, 1 ( 1980 ), 121–136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652 Langdon Winner. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics?Daedalus 109, 1 (1980), 121–136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652
  26. 10.1145/2771839.2771901 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–152 of 152

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Spiel, K., Hornecker, E., Williams, R. M., & Good, J.
Affiliations
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (DE)
  • Computer Graphics Technology, Purdue University, United States
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-04-29
Pages
1-21
DOI
10.1145/3491102.3517592
OpenAlex
W4225147585
Cited by
150
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 4
FWCI
23.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
FWF - Austrian Science Fund (T 1146-G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, neurodivergence, assistive technology, deficit framing, co-design, emic perspective, people with disabilities, human-computer interaction research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review