Cited by 35Teaching and Learning ProgrammingGender and Technology in EducationCareer Development and Diversity

A Decade of Demographics in Computing Education Research: A Critical Review of Trends in Collection, Reporting, and Use

Open access
Oleson, Alannah, Xie, Benjamin, Salac, Jean, Everson, Jayne, Kivuva, F. Megumi, Ko, Amy J.·2022·Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1

Abstract

Computing education research (CER) has used demographic data to understand learners’ identities, backgrounds, and contexts for efforts such as culturally-responsive computing. Prior work indicates that failing to elucidate and critically engage with the implicit assumptions of a field can unintentionally reinforce power structures that further marginalize people from non-dominant groups. The goal of this paper is two-fold: to understand what populations CER researchers have studied, and to surface implicit assumptions about how researchers have collected, reported, and used demographic data on these populations. We conducted a content analysis of 510 peer-reviewed papers published in 12 CER venues from 2012 to 2021. We found that (1) 60% of papers studied older learners in formal contexts (i.e. post-secondary education); (2) 68% of papers left unclear how researchers collected demographic data; and (3) while 94% of papers were single-site studies, only 14% addressed the limitations of their contexts. We also identified hegemonic norms through ambiguous aggregate term usage (e.g. underrepresented, diverse) in 23% of papers, and through incomplete reporting of demographics (i.e. leaving out demographics for some participants in their sample) in 35% of papers. We discuss the implications of these findings for the CER field, raising considerations for CER researchers to keep in mind when collecting, reporting, and using demographic data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3501385.3543967

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 204

  1. ACM. 2012. The 2012 ACM Computing Classification System -Introduction. Technical Report. https://www.acm.org/publications/class-2012-intro
  2. ACM Publications Board. 2019. Conflict of Interest Policy for ACM Publications. https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/conflict-of-interest. Accessed: 2022- 3-18.
  3. Ahmed Al-Zubidy, Jeffrey C. Carver, Sarah Heckman, and Mark Sherriff. 2016. A (Updated) Review of Empiricism at the SIGCSE Technical Symposium. In Pro- ceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (Memphis, Tennessee, USA) (SIGCSE '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844601 · DOI
  4. American Educational Research Association. 2006. Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications: American Educational Research Association. Educational researcher 35, 6 (Aug. 2006), 33-40. https: //doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035006033 · DOI
  5. American Educational Research Association. 2011. Code of Ethics. Ed- ucational researcher 40, 3 (April 2011), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 0013189X11410403 · DOI
  6. Gregory Anderson, Mariana Alfonso, and Jeffrey Sun. 2006. Rethinking Cooling Out at Public Community Colleges: An examination of fiscal and demographic trends in higher education and the rise of statewide articulation agreements. Teachers College Record 108, 3 (2006), 422-451.
  7. Margo Anderson and Stephen E. Fienberg. 2000. Race and Ethnicity and the Controversy over the US Census. Current Sociology 48, 3 (2000), 87-110.
  8. Tehreem Anwar, Arturo Jimenez, Arsalan Bin Najeeb, Bishakha Upadhyaya, and Monica M. McGill. 2020. Exploring the Enacted Computing Curriculum in K-12 Schools in South Asia: Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 79-90.
  9. Glen Archer, Leonard Bohmann, Allison Carter, Christopher Cischke, Linda M. Ott, and Leo Ureel. 2016. Understanding Similarities and Differences in Stu- dents across First-year Computing Majors. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1-8.
  10. Monica Babeş-Vroman, Thuytien N. Nguyen, and Thu D. Nguyen. 2021. Gender Diversity in Computer Science at a Large Public R1 Research University: Re- porting on a Self-study. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 22, 2 (Nov. 2021), 13:1-13:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471572 · DOI
  11. Rahul Banerjee, Leanne Liu, Kiley Sobel, Caroline Pitt, Kung Jin Lee, Meng Wang, Sijin Chen, Lydia Davison, Jason C. Yip, and Amy J. Ko. 2018. Empowering Families Facing Fnglish Literacy Challenges to Jointly Engage in Computer Programming. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-13.
  12. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301-1310. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521 · DOI
  13. William Bares, Bill Manaris, and Renée McCauley. 2018. Gender Equity in Computer Science through Computing in the Arts-A Six-year Longitudinal Study. Computer Science Education 28, 3 (2018), 191-210.
  14. Georges-Louis Baron, Beatrice Drot-Delange, Monique Grandbastien, and Françoise Tort. 2014. Computer Science Education in French Secondary Schools: Historical and Didactical Perspectives. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 14, 2 (June 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2602486 · DOI
  15. Valerie Barr. 2018. Different Denominators, Different Results: Reanalyzing CS degrees by gender, race, and ethnicity. ACM Inroads 9, 3 (2018), 40-47.
  16. Robert Bartlett. 2001. Medieval and Modern Concepts of Race and Ethnicity. Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 31, 1 (2001), 39-56.
  17. Debarati Basu, Harinni K. Kumar, Vinod K. Lohani, N. Dwight Barnette, God- mar Back, Dave McPherson, Calvin J. Ribbens, and Paul E. Plassmann. 2020. Integration and Evaluation of Spiral Theory Based Cybersecurity Modules into Core Computer Science and Engineering Courses. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 9-15.
  18. Michael M. Bell. 1992. The Fruit of Difference: The Rural-Urban Continuum as a System of Identity 1. Rural Sociology 57, 1 (1992), 65-82.
  19. Christopher T. Belser, M. Shillingford, Andrew P. Daire, Diandra J. Prescod, and Melissa A. Dagley. 2018. Factors Influencing Undergraduate Student Retention in STEM Majors: Career development, math ability, and demographics. Professional Counselor 8, 3 (2018), 262-276.
  20. Lisa Bender, Gursimran Walia, Krishna Kambhampaty, Kendall E. Nygard, and Travis E. Nygard. 2012. Social Sensitivity and Classroom Team Projects: An Empirical Investigation. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157258 · DOI
  21. Luciana Benotti, María Cecilia Martínez, and Fernando Schapachnik. 2014. Engaging High School Students Using Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591728 · DOI
  22. Patricia Berne, Aurora Levins Morales, David Langstaff, and Sins Invalid. 2018. Ten Principles of Disability Justice. WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly 46, 1 (2018), 227-230.
  23. Sylvia Beyer. 2014. Why Are Women Underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender Differences in Stereotypes, Self-Efficacy, Values, and Interests and Pre- dictors of Future CS Course-Taking and Grades. Computer Science Education 24, 2-3 (2014), 153-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963363 · DOI
  24. Michael David Black. 2016. Seven Semesters of Android Game Programming in CS2. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 5-10.
  25. Emmanuel G. Blanchard. 2012. On the WEIRD Nature of ITS/AIED Conferences. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 280-285. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_36 · DOI
  26. Jennifer M. Blaney. 2020. Broadening Participation in Computing: The role of upward transfer. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 254-260.
  27. Brianna Blaser and Richard E. Ladner. 2020. Why is Data on Disability so Hard to Collect and Understand?. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. IEEE, 1-8.
  28. George Boateng, Victor Wumbor-Apin Kumbol, and Prince Steven Annor. 2019. Keep Calm and Code on Your Phone: A Pilot of SuaCode, an Online Smartphone- Based Coding Course. In Proceedings of the 8th Computer Science Education Research Conference (CSERC '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375258.3375260 · DOI
  29. Dennis Bouvier, Ellie Lovellette, John Matta, Jing Bai, Jacqueline Chetty, Stan Kurkovsky, and Jia Wan. 2019. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Peer Instruction in Computing Courses. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Global Computing Education. 1-25.
  30. Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press.
  31. Julia Burdick-Will and John R. Logan. 2017. Schools at the Rural-Urban Bound- ary: Blurring the divide? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 672, 1 (2017), 185-201.
  32. Tracy Camp. 2002. The Incredible Shrinking Pipeline. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 129-134.
  33. Francine Chambers. 1997. What Do we Mean by Fluency? System 25, 4 (1997), 535-544.
  34. J. McGrath Cohoon. 2002. Recruiting and Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing Majors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (2002), 48-52.
  35. Raewyn Connell. 1994. Poverty and education. Harvard educational review 64, 2 (1994), 125-150.
  36. Christina Convertino. 2020. Nuancing the Discourse of Underrepresentation: a feminist post-structural analysis of gender inequality in computer science education in the US. Gender and education 32, 5 (July 2020), 594-607. https: //doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1632417 · DOI
  37. Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design Justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. MIT Press.
  38. Patricia A. Crawford and Vicky Zygouris-Coe. 2006. All in the Family: Connect- ing home and school with family literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal 33, 4 (2006), 261-267.
  39. Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw. 1994. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. In The Public Nature of Private Violence, Martha Albertson Fineman and Rixanne Mykitiuk (Eds.). Routledge, 93-118.
  40. Quintin Cutts, Judy Robertson, Peter Donaldson, and Laurie O'Donnell. 2017. An Evaluation of a Professional Learning Network for Computer Science Teachers. Computer Science Education 27, 1 (2017), 30-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408. 2017.1315958 · DOI
  41. Holger Danielsiek, Laura Toma, and Jan Vahrenhold. 2018. An instrument to assess self-efficacy in introductory algorithms courses. ACM Inroads 9, 1 (2018), 56-65.
  42. Adrienne Decker and Monica M. McGill. 2019. A Topical Review of Evaluation Instruments for Computing Education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 558-564. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287393 · DOI
  43. Adrienne Decker, Monica M. McGill, and Amber Settle. 2016. Towards a Com- mon Framework for Evaluating Computing Outreach Activities. In Proceed- ings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 627- 632. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844567 · DOI
  44. Leigh Ann DeLyser, Bryan Mascio, and Kelsey Finkel. 2016. Introducing Student Assessments with Evidence of Validity for NYC's CS4All. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (WiPSCE '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17-26. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2978249.2978252 · DOI
  45. Paul Denny, Brett A. Becker, Michelle Craig, Greg Wilson, and Piotr Ba- naszkiewicz. 2019. Research This! Questions That Computing Educators Most Want Computing Education Researchers to Answer. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339402 · DOI
  46. Betsy DiSalvo, Cecili Reid, and Parisa Khanipour Roshan. 2014. They Can't Find Us: The search for informal CS education. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 487-492.
  47. Caitlin Duncan and Tim Bell. 2015. A Pilot Computer Science and Programming Course for Primary School Students. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. 39-48.
  48. Ron Eglash, Juan E Gilbert, Valerie Taylor, and Susan R Geier. 2013. Culturally responsive computing in urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches. Urban Education 48, 5 (2013), 629-656.
  49. Sheena Erete, Karla Thomas, Denise Nacu, Jessa Dickinson, Naomi Thompson, and Nichole Pinkard. 2021. Applying a Transformative Justice Approach to Encourage the Participation of Black and Latina Girls in Computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 21, 4 (2021), 1-24.
  50. Barbara Ericson and Mark Guzdial. 2014. Measuring Demographics and Perfor- mance in Computer Science Education at a Nationwide Scale using AP CS Data. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science educa- tion (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (SIGCSE '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538918 · DOI
  51. Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busut- til, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M. McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019. An International Benchmark Study of K-12 Computer Science Education in schools. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 257-258.
  52. Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busut- til, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019. An International Comparison of K-12 Computer Science Education Intended and Enacted Curricula. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 1-10.
  53. Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busut- til, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M. McGill, and Keith Quille. 2019. An International Study Piloting the MEasuring TeacheR Enacted Computing Curriculum (METRECC) Instrument. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Edu- cation (ITiCSE-WGR '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111-142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3344429.3372505 · DOI
  54. Nina H. Fefferman, Eileen A O'Neil, and Elena N Naumova. 2005. Confidentiality and Confidence: Is data aggregation a means to achieve both? Journal of public health policy 26, 4 (2005), 430-449.
  55. Margot Ford. 2013. Achievement Gaps in Australia: What NAPLAN reveals about education inequality in Australia. Race Ethnicity and Education 16, 1 (2013), 80-102.
  56. Pauline Foster. 2020. Oral Fluency in a Second Language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching 53, 4 (2020), 446-461.
  57. Nichole M Garcia, Nancy López, and Verónica N Vélez. 2018. QuantCrit: rectify- ing quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Educa- tion 21, 2 (March 2018), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377675 · DOI
  58. Veerle Germeijs, Koen Luyckx, Guy Notelaers, Luc Goossens, and Karine Ver- schueren. 2012. Choosing a major in higher education: Profiles of students' decision-making process. Contemporary Educational Psychology 37, 3 (2012), 229-239.
  59. Melinda M Gibbons and Marianne Woodside. 2014. Addressing the needs of first- generation college students: Lessons learned from adults from low-education families. Journal of College Counseling 17, 1 (2014), 21-36.
  60. Catherine Wilson Gillespie and Sally Beisser. 2001. Developmentally appropriate LOGO computer programming with young children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual 2001, 1 (2001), 229-244.
  61. Ingrid Gogolin, Sarah McMonagle, and Tanja Salem. 2019. Germany: Systemic, sociocultural and linguistic perspectives on educational inequality. In The Palgrave handbook of race and ethnic inequalities in education. Springer, 557- 602.
  62. Norma González, Luis C Moll, and Cathy Amanti. 2006. Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Routledge.
  63. Joanna Goode. 2008. Increasing diversity in k-12 computer science: strate- gies from the field. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 362-366. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1352135.1352259 · DOI
  64. Joanna Goode, Max Skorodinsky, Jill Hubbard, and James Hook. 2020. Computer Science for Equity: Teacher Education, Agency, and Statewide Reform. Frontiers in Education 4 (2020), 162. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00162 · DOI
  65. Kevin J. Gucwa and Harry H. Cheng. 2017. Making Robot Challenges with Virtual Robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 273-277. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017700 · DOI
  66. Mariluz Guenaga, Andoni Eguíluz, Pablo Garaizar, and Juanjo Gibaja. 2021. How do students develop computational thinking? Assessing early programmers in a maze-based online game. Computer Science Education 31, 2 (2021), 259-289.
  67. Mark Guzdial. 2020. Talking about race in CS education. Commun. ACM 64, 1 (2020), 10-11.
  68. Juergen Habermas. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press.
  69. Juergen Habermas. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 2: Life- word and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Beacon Press.
  70. Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. Digital Footprints and Changing Networks During Online Identity Transi- tions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, California, USA, 2895-2907. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858136 · DOI
  71. Foad Hamidi, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Gender Recognition or Gender Reductionism? The Social Implications of Embedded Gen- der Recognition Systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, Montreal QC, Canada, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173582 · DOI
  72. Margaret Hamilton, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Naomi Augar, Vanea Chiprianov, Eveling Castro Gutierrez, Elizabeth Vidal Duarte, Helen H. Hu, Shoba Ittyipe, Janice L. Pearce, Michael Oudshoorn, and Emma Wong. 2016. Gender Eq- uity in Computing: International Faculty Perceptions and Current Practices. In Proceedings of the 2016 ITiCSE Working Group Reports (ITiCSE '16). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81-102. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3024906.3024911 · DOI
  73. David Hammer and Leema K Berland. 2014. Confusing claims for data: A critique of common practices for presenting qualitative research on learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 23, 1 (2014), 37-46.
  74. Kathleen J Hancock, Rachelle Maranon, Aaron M Montgomery, and Jodi Tims. 2021. Female Scholars in Computer Science: The Role of Family and Other Factors in Achieving Academic Success. In 2021 Conference on Research in Eq- uitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1-8.
  75. Caroline D Hardin. 2021. "Learning from Mistakes Is the Best Thing": Risk and Persistence at Hackathons. In 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
  76. Jean Hardy, Susan Wyche, and Tiffany Veinot. 2019. Rural HCI research: Defi- nitions, distinctions, methods, and opportunities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1-33.
  77. Sarah Heckman, Jeffrey C Carver, Mark Sherriff, and Ahmed Al-zubidy. 2021. A Systematic Literature Review of Empiricism and Norms of Reporting in Computing Education Research Literature. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 22, 1 (Oct. 2021), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3470652 · DOI
  78. C Richard G Helps, Robert B Jackson, and Marshall B Romney. 2005. Student expectations of computing majors. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Infor- mation technology education. 101-106.
  79. Kathryn Hill and Cheri Fancsali. 2021. Bridging Professional Development to Practice: Using School Support Visits to Build Teacher Confidence in Delivering Equitable CS Instruction. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 725-731.
  80. Apriel K Hodari, Maria Ong, Lily T Ko, and Janet Smith. 2015. Enabling courage: Agentic strategies of women of color in computing. In 2015 Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1-7.
  81. Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2021. Terms of inclusion: Data, discourse, violence. New Media & Society 23, 12 (Dec. 2021), 3539-3556. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444820958725 Publisher: SAGE Publications. · DOI
  82. Sally A. M. Hogenboom, Felienne F. J. Hermans, and Han L. J. Van der Maas. 2021. Computerized Adaptive Assessment of Understanding of Programming Concepts in Primary School Children. Computer Science Education 0, 0 (2021), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1914461 · DOI
  83. Paul W Holland. 1986. Statistics and Causal Inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81, 396 (Dec. 1986), 945-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Hayward Derrick Horton. 1999. Critical Demography: The Paradigm of the Future? Sociological Forum 14, 3 (1999), 363-367.
  85. David L Hosking. 2008. Critical disability theory. In A paper presented at the 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference at Lancaster University, UK, Vol. 14. 736.
  86. Peter Hubwieser. 2013. The darmstadt model: a first step towards a research framework for computer science education in schools. In International Confer- ence on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives. Springer, 1-14.
  87. Peter Hubwieser, Michail N Giannakos, Marc Berges, Torsten Brinda, Ira Di- ethelm, Johannes Magenheim, Yogendra Pal, Jana Jackova, and Egle Jasute. 2015. A global snapshot of computer science education in K-12 schools. In Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on working group reports. 65-83.
  88. Ida Hummelstedt, Gunilla Holm, Fritjof Sahlström, and Harriet Zilliacus. 2021. 'Refugees here and Finns there'-categorisations of race, nationality, and gender in a Finnish classroom. Intercultural Education 32, 2 (2021), 145-159.
  89. Robert A Hummer. 1996. Black-white differences in health and mortality: A review and conceptual model. The Sociological Quarterly 37, 1 (1996), 105-125.
  90. Petri Ihantola, Arto Vihavainen, Alireza Ahadi, Matthew Butler, Jürgen Börstler, Stephen H. Edwards, Essi Isohanni, Ari Korhonen, Andrew Petersen, Kelly Rivers, Miguel Ángel Rubio, Judy Sheard, Bronius Skupas, Jaime Spacco, Claudia Szabo, and Daniel Toll. 2015. Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming: Literature Review and Case Studies. In Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports (ITICSE-WGR '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 41-63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858798 · DOI
  91. Sharin Jacob, Ha Nguyen, Leiny Garcia, Debra Richardson, and Mark Warschauer. 2020. Teaching Computational Thinking to Multilingual Students through Inquiry-based Learning. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Par- ticipation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272487 · DOI
  92. Sharin Rawhiya Jacob, Jonathan Montoya, Ha Nguyen, Debra Richardson, and Mark Warschauer. 2022. Examining the What, Why, and How of Multilingual Student Identity Development in Computer Science. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) (2022).
  93. Sharin Rawhiya Jacob, Sara Vogel, Rose K Pozos, Patricia Ordóñez Franco, and Jean Ryoo. 2021. Leveraging Multilingual Students' Resources for Equitable Computer Science Instruction. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1-2.
  94. Catherine Jampel. 2018. Intersections of disability justice, racial justice and environmental justice. Environmental Sociology 4, 1 (2018), 122-135.
  95. Ben Jelen, Julia Dunbar, Susan Monsey, Olivia K Richards, and Katie A Siek. 2019. Utilizing the Affinity Research Group Model in a Summer Research Expe- rience for Undergraduates Program. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 990-996.
  96. Britney Johnson, Ben Rydal Shapiro, Betsy DiSalvo, Annabel Rothschild, and Carl DiSalvo. 2021. Exploring Approaches to Data Literacy Through a Critical Race Theory Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21, Article 706). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1-15. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445141 · DOI
  97. Stephanie T Jones et al. 2021. We tell these stories to survive: Towards abolition in computer science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 21, 2 (2021), 290-308.
  98. Yasmin Kafai, Chris Proctor, and Debora Lui. 2020. From theory bias to theory dialogue: embracing cognitive, situated, and critical framings of computational thinking in K-12 CS education. ACM Inroads 11, 1 (Feb. 2020), 44-53. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3381887 · DOI
  99. Gopinaath Kannabiran. 2011. Themself: Critical analysis of gender in Facebook. In CHI workshop paper.
  100. Patricia J Kannapel and Alan J DeYoung. 1999. The rural school problem in 1999: A review and critique of the literature. Journal of Research in rural Education 15, 2 (1999), 67-79.
  101. Amy J. Ko and Katie Davis. 2017. Computing Mentorship in a Software Boom- town: Relationships to Adolescent Interest and Beliefs. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3106177 · DOI
  102. Amy J Ko, Alannah Oleson, Mara Kirdani-Ryan, Yim Register, Benjamin Xie, Mina Tari, Matthew Davidson, Stefania Druga, and Dastyni Loksa. 2020. It is time for more critical CS education. Commun. ACM 63, 11 (2020), 31-33.
  103. Lawrence Kohlberg. 1974. The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The journal of philosophy 70, 18 (1974), 630-646.
  104. Harrison Kwik, Benjamin Xie, and Amy J Ko. 2018. Experiences of Computer Science Transfer Students. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Inter- national Computing Education Research (Espoo, Finland) (ICER '18). ACM Press, 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3231004 · DOI
  105. Richard E Ladner, Caitlyn Seim, Ather Sharif, Naba Rizvi, and Abraham Glasser. 2021. Experiences of Computing Students with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 939-940.
  106. Richard E. Ladner, Andreas Stefik, and Brianna Blaser. 2019. Addressing Disability in CS for All. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Partici- pation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1-1. https: //doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985671 · DOI
  107. Richard E. Ladner, Andreas Stefik, Jill Naumann, and Erin Peach. 2020. Computer Science Principles for Teachers of Deaf Students. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272432 · DOI
  108. Outi Laiti. 2016. The Ethnoprogramming Model. In Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 150- 154. https://doi.org/10.1145/2999541.2999545 · DOI
  109. Justin Langlois. 2020. Recuperating Conflict: Between Critical Generosity and Antagonistic Activation. Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal 5, 1 (2020), 148-157.
  110. Yinchen Lei and Meghan Allen. 2022. English Language Learners in Computer Science Education: A Scoping Review. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 57-63.
  111. Robert W Lent, Frederick G Lopez, Hung-Bin Sheu, and Antonio M Lopez Jr. 2011. Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented students. Journal of Vocational Behavior 78, 2 (2011), 184-192.
  112. Lara Letaw, Rosalinda Garcia, Heather Garcia, Christopher Perdriau, and Mar- garet Burnett. 2021. Changing the Online Climate via the Online Students: Effects of Three Curricular Interventions on Online CS Students' Inclusivity. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469742 · DOI
  113. Colleen Lewis, Paul Bruno, Jonathan Raygoza, and Julia Wang. 2019. Alignment of goals and perceptions of computing predicts students' sense of belonging in computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Comput- ing Education Research. 11-19.
  114. Calvin A. Liang, Sean A. Munson, and Julie A. Kientz. 2021. Embracing Four Tensions in Human-Computer Interaction Research with Marginalized People. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 28, 2 (April 2021), 14:1-14:47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3443686 · DOI
  115. Raymond Lister. 2016. Toward a developmental epistemology of computer programming. In Proceedings of the 11th workshop in primary and secondary computing education. 5-16.
  116. Stephanie Ludi, Debra Bernstein, and Karen Mutch-Jones. 2018. Enhanced Ro- botics! Improving Building and Programming Learning Experiences for Students with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 372-377. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159501 · DOI
  117. Stephanie Lunn, Maíra Marques Samary, and Alan Peterfreund. 2021. Where is Computer Science Education Research Happening?. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Virtual Event, USA) (SIGCSE '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432375 · DOI
  118. Stephanie Lunn, Leila Zahedi, Monique Ross, and Matthew Ohland. 2021. Explo- ration of Intersectionality and Computer Science Demographics: Understanding the Historical Context of Shifts in Participation. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 2 (March 2021), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3445985 · DOI
  119. Louise Ann Lyon and Emily Green. 2021. Coding Boot Camps: Enabling Women to Enter Computing Professions. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 2 (Feb. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3440891 · DOI
  120. Tia C Madkins, Alexis Martin, Jean Ryoo, Kimberly A Scott, Joanna Goode, Allison Scott, and Frieda McAlear. 2019. Culturally Relevant Computer Science Pedagogy: From Theory to Practice. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1-4. https: //doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985773 · DOI
  121. Martin N Marger. 2015. Race and Ethnic Relations: American and Global Perspec- tives, 10th Edition. Cengage.
  122. Jane Margolis. 2017. Stuck in the Shallow End, updated edition: Education, Race, and Computing. MIT press.
  123. Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in com- puting. MIT press.
  124. Lauren Margulieux, Tuba Ayer Ketenci, and Adrienne Decker. 2019. Review of measurements used in computing education research and suggestions for increasing standardization. Computer Science Education 29, 1 (Jan. 2019), 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1562145 · DOI
  125. David Mayeda, Alan France, Tepora Pukepuke, Lucy Cowie, and Marilyn Chetty. 2022. Colonial Disparities in Higher Education: Explaining Racial Inequality for Māori Youth in Aotearoa New Zealand. Social Policy and Society 21, 1 (2022), 80-92.
  126. Roger McDermott, Mark Zarb, Mats Daniels, and Ville Isomöttönen. 2017. First Year Computing Students' Perceptions of Authenticity in Assessment. In Pro- ceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059062 · DOI
  127. Steven McGee, Randi McGee-Tekula, Jennifer Duck, Lucia Dettori, Ronald I. Greenberg, Andrew M. Rasmussen, Erica Wheeler, and Adam Shelton. 2020. Does a Computer Science Graduation Requirement Contribute to Increased Enrollment in Advanced Computer Science Coursework?. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272493 · DOI
  128. Steven McGee, Randi McGee-Tekula, Jennifer Duck, Taylor White, Ronald I. Greenberg, Lucia Dettori, Dale F. Reed, Brenda Wilkerson, Don Yanek, An- drew Rasmussen, and Gail Chapman. 2016. Does a Taste of Computing In- crease Computer Science Enrollment?. In 2016 Research on Equity and Sus- tained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2016.7836165 · DOI
  129. Monica M McGill, Adrienne Decker, and Zachary Abbott. 2018. Improving Research and Experience Reports of Pre-College Computing Activities: A Gap Analysis. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (SIGCSE '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 964-969. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3159450.3159481 · DOI
  130. Monica M McGill, Adrienne Decker, and Amber Settle. 2016. Undergraduate stu- dents' perceptions of the impact of pre-college computing activities on choices of major. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 16, 4 (2016), 1-33.
  131. Marlon Mejias, Ketly Jean-Pierre, Legand Burge, and Gloria Washington. 2018. Culturally Relevant CS Pedagogy -Theory and Practice. In 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491699 · DOI
  132. Amanda Menier, Rebecca Zarch, and Stacey Sexton. 2021. Broadening Gender in Computing for Transgender and Nonbinary Learners. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021. 9620612 · DOI
  133. Craig S Miller and Amber Settle. 2016. Some Trouble with Transparency: An Analysis of Student Errors with Object-oriented Python. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (ICER '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1145/2960310.2960327 · DOI
  134. Jeffrey Miller, Saty Raghavachary, and Andrew Goodney. 2018. Benefits of exposing K-12 students to computer science through summer camp programs. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1-5.
  135. Briana B. Morrison, Lijun Ni, and Mark Guzdial. 2012. Adapting the Disciplinary Commons Model for High School Teachers: Improving Recruitment, Creating Community. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on Inter- national Computing Education Research (ICER '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2361276.2361287 · DOI
  136. Briana B Morrison, Beth A Quinn, Steven Bradley, Kevin Buffardi, Brian Har- rington, Helen H Hu, Maria Kallia, Fiona McNeill, Oluwakemi Ola, Miranda Parker, et al. 2021. Evidence for Teaching Practices that Broaden Participation for Women in Computing. In Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 57-131.
  137. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (Ed.). 2018. How People Learn II: Learners, Contexts, and Cultures. National Academies Press.
  138. Greg L Nelson and Amy J Ko. 2018. On Use of Theory in Computing Education Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM.
  139. Kimberly A Neuendorf. 2017. The Content Analysis Guidebook. SAGE.
  140. Lisa M Nicholson, Sandy J Slater, Jamie F Chriqui, and Frank Chaloupka. 2014. Validating Adolescent Socioeconomic Status: Comparing School Free or Reduced Price Lunch with Community Measures. Spatial Demography 2, 1 (April 2014), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03354904 · DOI
  141. Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of oppression. New York University Press.
  142. Anthony Christian Ocampo. 2016. The Latinos of Asia. In The Latinos of Asia. Stanford University Press.
  143. Michael Omi and Howard Winant. 2014. Racial formation in the United States. Routledge.
  144. Zacharoula Papamitsiou, Michail Giannakos, Simon, and Andrew Luxton- Reilly. 2020. Computing Education Research Landscape through an Analy- sis of Keywords. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Virtual Event, New Zealand) (ICER '20). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 102-112. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406276 · DOI
  145. Dylan Paré. 2021. A Critical Review and New Directions for Queering Com- puting and Computing Education. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education (2021).
  146. Thomas H Park and Susan Wiedenbeck. 2011. Learning web development: challenges at an earlier stage of computing education. In Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research (Providence, Rhode Island, USA) (ICER '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2016911.2016937 · DOI
  147. Dudley L Poston, Jr. 2019. Handbook of Population. Springer International Publishing.
  148. Vahab Pournaghshband and Paola Medel. 2020. Promoting Diversity-Inclusive Computer Science Pedagogies: A Multidimensional Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341525.3387360 · DOI
  149. Heather E Price. 2019. Large-Scale Datasets and Social Justice: Measuring Inequality in Opportunities to Learn. In Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education, Kamden K Strunk and Leslie Ann Locke (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 05900-2_17 · DOI
  150. Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, Kasama Ketsuriyonk, Jignesh M Patel, and Richard Halverson. 2017. What Do Students Feel about Learning Programming Using Both English and Their Native Language?. In 2017 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE). IEEE, 1-8.
  151. Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj, Hanqi Zhang, Viren Abhyankar, Saswati Mukerjee, Eda Zhang, Jim Williams, Richard Halverson, and Jignesh M Patel. 2019. Impact of bilingual cs education on student learning and engagement in a data struc- tures course. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 1-10.
  152. Vennila Ramalingam and Susan Wiedenbeck. 1998. Development and Validation of Scores on a Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Scale and Group Analyses of Novice Programmer Self-Efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research 19, 4 (1998), 367-381.
  153. Justus J Randolph. 2007. Computer science education research at the crossroads: A methodological review of computer science education research, 2000-2005. Ph.D. Dissertation. Utah State University, Ann Arbor, United States.
  154. Justus J Randolph. 2007. Findings from" A Methodological Review of the Com- puter Science Education Research: 2000-2005". ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 4 (2007), 130-130.
  155. Yolanda Rankin, Maedeh Agharazidermani, and Jakita Thomas. 2020. The Role of Familial Influences in African American Women's Persistence in Computing. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803. 2020.9272503 · DOI
  156. Yolanda A. Rankin and Jakita O. Thomas. 2019. Straighten Up and Fly Right: Rethinking intersectionality in HCI research. Interactions 26, 6 (Oct. 2019), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363033 · DOI
  157. Yolanda A. Rankin, Jakita O. Thomas, and Sheena Erete. 2021. Black Women Speak: Examining Power, Privilege, and Identity in CS Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 21, 4 (Oct. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3451344 · DOI
  158. Yim Register and Amy J. Ko. 2020. Learning Machine Learning with Personal Data Helps Stakeholders Ground Advocacy Arguments in Model Mechanics. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406252 · DOI · Paper page
  159. Clara E Rodriguez. 2000. Changing race: Latinos, the census, and the history of ethnicity in the United States. Vol. 41. NYU Press.
  160. Jennifer Rosato, Chery Lucarelli, Cassandra Beckworth, and Ralph Morelli. 2017. A Comparison of Online and Hybrid Professional Development for CS Principles Teachers. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3059009.3059060 · DOI
  161. Doreen A Rosenthal, Ross M Gurney, and Susan M Moore. 1981. From trust on intimacy: A new inventory for examining Erikson's stages of psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 10, 6 (1981), 525-537.
  162. Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2020. The Intersection of Being Black and Being a Woman: Examining the Effect of Social Computing Relationships on Computer Science Career Choice. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 20, 2 (Feb. 2020), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377426 · DOI
  163. Jean J Ryoo, Alicia Morris, and Jane Margolis. 2021. "What Happens to the Ras- pado man in a Cash-free Society?": Teaching and Learning Socially Responsible Computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 21, 4 (2021), 1-28.
  164. Rogelio Sáenz and Maria Cristina Morales. 2019. Demography of Race and Ethnicity. In Handbook of Population, Dudley L Poston, Jr (Ed.). Springer Interna- tional Publishing, Cham, 163-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10910-3_7 · DOI
  165. Jean Salac, Cathy Thomas, Chloe Butler, and Diana Franklin. 2021. Under- standing the Link between Computer Science Instruction and Reading & Math Performance. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1. 408-414.
  166. Kate Sanders, Sally Fincher, Dennis Bouvier, Gary Lewandowski, Briana Mor- rison, Laurie Murphy, Marian Petre, Brad Richards, Josh Tenenberg, Lynda Thomas, et al. 2005. A multi-institutional, multinational study of programming concepts using card sort data. Expert Systems 22, 3 (2005), 121-128.
  167. Kate Sanders, Judy Sheard, Brett A Becker, Anna Eckerdal, Sally Hamouda, and Simon. 2019. Inferential Statistics in Computing Education Research: A Methodological Review. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Inter- national Computing Education Research (Toronto ON, Canada) (ICER '19). As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 177-185. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339408 · DOI
  168. Linda J. Sax, Jennifer M. Blaney, Christina Zavala, and Kaitlin N. S. Newhouse. 2020. Who Takes Intro Computing? Examining the Degree Plans of Introductory Computing Students in Light of Booming Enrollments. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272431 · DOI
  169. Linda J Sax, Kathleen J Lehman, and Christina Zavala. 2017. Examining the enrollment growth: non-cs majors in CS1 courses. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 513-518.
  170. Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5412-5427. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025766 · DOI · Paper page
  171. Kristin A Searle, Deborah A Fields, Debora A Lui, and Yasmin B Kafai. 2014. Diversifying high school students' views about computing with electronic textiles. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research (Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom) (ICER '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2632320.2632352 · DOI · Paper page
  172. Mazyar Seraj, Eva-Sophie Katterfeldt, Kerstin Bub, Serge Autexier, and Rolf Drechsler. 2019. Scratch and Google Blockly: How Girls' Programming Skills and Attitudes are Influenced. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 1-10.
  173. Sadia Sharmin, Daniel Zingaro, Lisa Zhang, and Clare Brett. 2019. Impact of Open-Ended Assignments on Student Self-Efficacy in CS1. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Global Computing Education (CompEd '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3300115.3309532 · DOI
  174. Leonardo Silva, Antonio Mendes, Anabela Gomes, Gabriel Fortes, Chan Tong Lam, and Calana Chan. 2021. Exploring the Association between Self-Regulation of Learning and Programming Learning: A Multinational Investigation. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1-8.
  175. Audrey Smedley and Brian D Smedley. 2005. Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. American psychologist 60, 1 (2005), 16.
  176. Amber Solomon, DeKita Moon, Armisha L Roberts, and Juan E Gilbert. 2018. Not just Black and not just a woman: Black women belonging in computing. In 2018 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1-5.
  177. Peter J Spiro. 1997. Dual nationality and the meaning of citizenship. Immigr. & Nat'lity L. Rev. 18 (1997), 491.
  178. Claude Steele. 2011. Stereotype Threat and African-American Student Achieve- ment. In The Inequality Reader (2 ed.). Routledge, 276-281. https://doi.org/10. 4324/9780429494468-31 · DOI
  179. Steve Stemler. 2000. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 7, 1 (2000), 17. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34 · DOI
  180. Hephzibah V Strmic-Pawl, Brandon A Jackson, and Steve Garner. 2018. Race counts: racial and ethnic data on the US Census and the implications for tracking inequality. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 4, 1 (2018), 1-13.
  181. Anastasios Theodoropoulos, Angeliki Antoniou, and George Lepouras. 2016. How Do Different Cognitive Styles Affect Learning Programming? Insights from a Game-Based Approach in Greek Schools. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 17, 1 (Sept. 2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2940330 · DOI
  182. Jakita O Thomas, Nicole Joseph, Arian Williams, Chan'tel Crum, and Jamika Burge. 2018. Speaking Truth to Power: Exploring the Intersectional Expe- riences of Black Women in Computing. In 2018 Research on Equity and Sus- tained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2018.8491718 · DOI
  183. Debra Thompson. 2015. What Lies Beneath: Equality and the making of racial classifications. Social Philosophy & Policy 31, 2 (2015), 114. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
  184. Joseph S Tuman. 2009. Communicating terror: The rhetorical dimensions of terrorism. Sage Publications.
  185. Sherry Turkle and Seymour Papert. 1992. Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 11, 1 (1992), 3-33.
  186. Sepehr Vakil. 2018. Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice- centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard Educational Review 88, 1 (2018), 26-52.
  187. Bas Van Zadelhoff, Ebrahim Rahimi, and Erik Barendsen. 2021. Principles to Facilitate Design-Based Learning Environments for Programming in Secondary Education While Making Learning Visible in an Authentic Way. In 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
  188. Roli Varma. 2010. Why so few women enroll in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students' perception. Computer Science Education 20, 4 (2010), 301-316.
  189. Rebecca Vivian and Katrina Falkner. 2019. Identifying Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Computer Science in the Primary Years. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Re- search (Toronto ON, Canada) (ICER '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339410 · DOI
  190. Sara Vogel, Christopher Hoadley, Laura Ascenzi-Moreno, and Kate Menken. 2019. The role of translanguaging in computational literacies: Documenting middle school bilinguals' practices in computer science integrated units. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 1164-1170.
  191. Kristina von Hausswolff, Anna Eckerdal, and Michael Thuné. 2020. Learning to Program Hands-on: A Controlled Study. In Koli Calling '20: Proceedings of the 20th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428029.3428058 · DOI
  192. Lev Semenovich Vygotsky and Michael Cole. 1978. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
  193. Isabel Wagner. 2016. Gender and Performance in Computer Science. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 16, 3 (May 2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2920173 · DOI
  194. Susan E Walden, Deborah A Trytten, Randa L Shehab, and Cindy E Foor. 2018. Critiquing the" Underrepresented Minorities" Label. In 2018 CoNECD-The Col- laborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference.
  195. Alicia Nicki Washington. 2020. When twice as good isn't enough: The case for cultural competence in computing. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 213-219.
  196. Max Weber. 1948. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Vol. 33. Routledge.
  197. Tiffani L Williams. 2020. Underrepresented minority'considered harmful, racist language. Commun. ACM (2020).
  198. Alyssa Friend Wise and David Williamson Shaffer. 2015. Why Theory Matters More than Ever in the Age of Big Data. Journal of Learning Analytics 2, 2 (Dec. 2015), 5-13.
  199. Billy Wong. 2016. 'I'm good, but not that good': digitally-skilled young people's identity in computing. Computer Science Education 26, 4 (2016), 299-317.
  200. Benjamin Xie, Matt J Davidson, Baker Franke, Emily McLeod, Min Li, and Amy J Ko. 2021. Domain Experts' Interpretations of Assessment Bias in a Scaled, Online Computer Science Curriculum. In Proceedings of the Eight ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S 2021, Vol. 29). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430895. 3460141 · DOI

200 of 204 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oleson, A., Xie, B., Salac, J., Everson, J., Kivuva, F. M., & Ko, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Bard College (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-08-03
Pages
323-343
OpenAlex
W4289731714
Cited by
35
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10
FWCI
8.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2122950, 2100296, 1539179, 2137312, 2127309, 2137834, 2031265, 1762114, 1836813, 1703304)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
demographic data, computing education research, demographic reporting, data collection practices, underrepresented groups, hegemonic norms, power structures, marginalized communities, older students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review