Cited by 41Social Robot Interaction and HRIUsability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Understanding the Importance of Cultural Appropriateness for User Interface Design: An Avatar Study

Aljaroodi, Hussain M., Adam, Marc T. P., Teubner, Timm, Chiong, Raymond·2022·ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Abstract

While previous research established that culture plays an important role in technology adoption, there is only limited work on the role of cultural appropriateness in user interface design for users from a specific background. In this study, we focus on the case of avatar design as a user interface element for facilitating positive user experience. Building on the theoretical lenses of social response theory and the “Computers Are Social Actors” paradigm, we develop a research model to investigate how cultural appropriateness of avatar design is a vital driver for users’ trust. We evaluate our research model by means of an online experiment ( n = 313) in the context of online health advice for users from Saudi Arabia. The avatars differed in appearance (Arab, non-Arab), gender (male, female), and clothing (athletic, medical, everyday). Our results show that Arab avatars exhibited significantly higher cultural appropriateness than non-Arab avatars. Furthermore, participants were more inclined to select an Arab avatar (88.2%) that matched their gender (77.3%). Confirming the critical role of cultural appropriateness, our study demonstrates the importance of carefully considering the target audience in designing user interfaces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3517138

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aljaroodi, H. M., Adam, M. T. P., Teubner, T., & Chiong, R.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Public Administration (SA)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2022-12-31
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7325
OpenAlex
W4220721179
Cited by
41
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
cultural appropriateness, avatar design, user interface design, user trust, social response theory, Computers Are Social Actors, online health advice, gender matching, target audience, Saudi Arabia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review