Cited by 5Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Real-time style transfer with efficient vision transformers

Benmeziane, Hadjer, Ouarnoughi, Hamza, Maghraoui, Kaoutar El, Niar, Smail·2022·Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Edge Systems, Analytics and Networking

Abstract

Style Transfer aims at transferring the artistic style from a reference image to a content image. While Deep Learning (DL) has achieved state-of-the-art Style Transfer performance using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), its real-time application still requires powerful hardware such as GPU-accelerated systems. This paper leverages transformer-based models to accelerate real-time Style Transfer on mobile and embedded hardware platforms. We designed a Neural Architecture Search (NAS) algorithm dedicated to vision transformers to find the best set of architecture hyperparameters that maximizes the Style Transfer performance, expressed in Frame/seconds (FPS). Our approach has been evaluated and validated on the Xiaomi Redmi 7 mobile phone and the Raspberry Pi 3 platform. Experimental evaluation shows that our approach allows to achieve a 3.5x and 2.1x speedups compared to CNN-based Style Transfer models and Transformer-based models respectively1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3517206.3526271

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The searched network for Real-time Style Transfer is at least 2.1× faster than the baseline model for style transfer on Xiaomi Redmi 10 mobile and Raspberry Pi 3 embedded devices.

    “The searched network is at least 2.1 × faster than the baseline model for style transfer on Xiaomi Redmi 10 mobile and Raspberry Pi 3 embedded devices.”

    From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [200]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benmeziane, H., Ouarnoughi, H., Maghraoui, K. E., & Niar, S.
Affiliations
  • Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France (FR)
  • IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
  • Univ. Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, Valenciennes, France
Venue
Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Edge Systems, Analytics and Networking
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-04-05
Pages
31-36
OpenAlex
W4220870460
Cited by
5
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Workshop on Edge Systems, Analytics and Networking (EdgeSys) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
style transfer, real-time inference, vision transformer, neural architecture search, mobile devices, embedded hardware, inference acceleration, frame rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review