Cited by 118Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data ClassificationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Neural Architecture Search for Transformers: A Survey

Open access
Chitty-Venkata, Krishna Teja, Emani, Murali, Vishwanath, Venkatram, Somani, Arun K.·2022·IEEE Access

Abstract

Transformer-based Deep Neural Network architectures have gained tremendous interest due to their effectiveness in various applications across Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Computer Vision (CV) domains. These models are the de facto choice in several language tasks, such as Sentiment Analysis and Text Summarization, replacing Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) model. Vision Transformers (ViTs) have shown better model performance than traditional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in vision applications while requiring significantly fewer parameters and training time. The design pipeline of a neural architecture for a given task and dataset is extremely challenging as it requires expertise in several interdisciplinary areas such as signal processing, image processing, optimization and allied fields. Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is a promising technique to automate the architectural design process of a Neural Network in a data-driven way using Machine Learning (ML) methods. The search method explores several architectures without requiring significant human effort, and the searched models outperform the manually built networks. In this paper, we review Neural Architecture Search techniques, targeting the Transformer model and its family of architectures such as Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and Vision Transformers. We provide an in-depth literature review of approximately 50 state-of-the-art Neural Architecture Search methods and explore future directions in this fast-evolving class of problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2022.3212767

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Searched transformer networks through NAS and HW-NAS often outperform manually designed models in accuracy and compute performance on the target hardware.

    “The searched transformer networks through NAS and HW-NAS often outperform manually designed models in accuracy and compute performance on the target hardware [188].”

    From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [188]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chitty-Venkata, K. T., Emani, M., Vishwanath, V., & Somani, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2022
Volume
10
Pages
108374-108412
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312257891
Cited by
118
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Philip and Virginia Sproul Professorship
  • National Science Foundation at Iowa State University (MRI 1726447, MRI 2018594)
  • Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility (DEAC02-06CH11357)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
neural architecture search, transformer models, vision transformer, BERT, automated neural network design, search strategies, natural language processing, computer vision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review