Cited by 102Machine Learning in HealthcareMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsElectronic Health Records Systems

M3Care: Learning with Missing Modalities in Multimodal Healthcare Data

Open access
Zhang, Chaohe, Chu, Xu, Ma, Liantao, Zhu, Yinghao, Wang, Yasha, Wang, Jiangtao, Zhao, Junfeng·2022·Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Abstract

Multimodal electronic health record (EHR) data are widely used in clinical applications. Conventional methods usually assume that each sample (patient) is associated with the unified observed modalities, and all modalities are available for each sample. However, missing modality caused by various clinical and social reasons is a common issue in real-world clinical scenarios. Existing methods mostly rely on solving a generative model that learns a mapping from the latent space to the original input space, which is an unstable ill-posed inverse problem. To relieve the underdetermined system, we propose a model solving a direct problem, dubbed learning with Missing Modalities in Multimodal healthcare data (M3Care). M3Care is an end-to-end model compensating the missing information of the patients with missing modalities to perform clinical analysis. Instead of generating raw missing data, M3Care imputes the task-related information of the missing modalities in the latent space by the auxiliary information from each patient's similar neighbors, measured by a task-guided modality-adaptive similarity metric, and thence conducts the clinical tasks. The task-guided modality-adaptive similarity metric utilizes the uncensored modalities of the patient and the other patients who also have the same uncensored modalities to find similar patients. Experiments on real-world datasets show that M3Care outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines. Moreover, the findings discovered by M3Care are consistent with experts and medical knowledge, demonstrating the capability and the potential of providing useful insights and explanations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3534678.3539388

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • M3Care learned unimodal representations, constructed a similarity graph of patients, and imputed the latent space of missing modality in different patients.

    “The M3Care method learned the unimodal representations, constructed the similarity graph of patients, and then imputed the latent space of missing modality in different patients [151].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Arvind Agarwal, Samuel Gerber, and Hal Daume. 2010. Learning multiple tasks using manifold regularization. Advances in neural information processing systems 23 (2010).
  2. Hassan Akbari, Linagzhe Yuan, Rui Qian, Wei-Hong Chuang, Shih-Fu Chang, Yin Cui, and Boqing Gong. 2021. Vatt: Transformers for multimodal self-supervised learning from raw video, audio and text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.11178 (2021). · arXiv
  3. Eray Atalay, Nevbahar Tamçelik, Ceyhun Arici, Ahmet Özkök, and Metin Dastan. 2015. The change in intraocular pressure after pupillary dilation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, and eyes of normal subjects. International ophthalmology 35, 2 (2015), 215-219.
  4. Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2016. Layer normaliza- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 (2016). · arXiv
  5. Tian Bai and Slobodan Vucetic. 2019. Improving medical code prediction from clinical text via incorporating online knowledge sources. In The World Wide Web Conference. 72-82.
  6. Tadas Baltrušaitis, Chaitanya Ahuja, and Louis-Philippe Morency. 2018. Multi- modal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 41, 2 (2018), 423-443.
  7. Inci M Baytas, Cao Xiao, Xi Zhang, Fei Wang, Anil K Jain, and Jiayu Zhou. 2017. Patient subtyping via time-aware LSTM networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 65-74.
  8. Lei Cai, Zhengyang Wang, Hongyang Gao, Dinggang Shen, and Shuiwang Ji. 2018. Deep adversarial learning for multi-modality missing data completion. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1158-1166.
  9. Jiayi Chen and Aidong Zhang. 2020. Hgmf: heterogeneous graph-based fusion for multimodal data with incompleteness. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1295-1305.
  10. Pei-Qing Chen, Xue-Mei Han, Ya-Nan Zhu, and Jia Xu. 2016. Comparison of the anti-inflammatory effects of fluorometholone 0.1% combined with levofloxacin 0.5% and tobramycin/dexamethasone eye drops after cataract surgery. Interna- tional Journal of Ophthalmology 9, 11 (2016), 1619.
  11. Edward Choi, Cao Xiao, Walter Stewart, and Jimeng Sun. 2018. Mime: Multilevel medical embedding of electronic health records for predictive healthcare. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 4547-4557.
  12. Biswa Nath Datta. 2010. Numerical linear algebra and applications. Vol. 116. Siam.
  13. Jesse Davis and Mark Goadrich. 2006. The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning. 233-240.
  14. Craig K Enders. 2010. Applied missing data analysis. Guilford press.
  15. FM Ford and J Ford. 2000. Non-attendance for Social Security medical exami- nation: patients who cannot afford to get better? Occupational medicine 50, 7 (2000), 504-507.
  16. Junyi Gao, Cao Xiao, Lucas M Glass, and Jimeng Sun. 2020. Compose: Cross- modal pseudo-siamese network for patient trial matching. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 803-812.
  17. Jen J Gong and John V Guttag. 2018. Learning to Summarize Electronic Health Records Using Cross-Modality Correspondences. In Machine Learning for Health- care Conference. PMLR, 551-570.
  18. Trong Nghia Hoang, Shenda Hong, Cao Xiao, Bryan Low, and Jimeng Sun. 2021. AID: Active Distillation Machine to Leverage Pre-Trained Black-Box Models in Private Data Settings. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 3569-3581.
  19. Xin Hong, Pengfei Xiong, Renhe Ji, and Haoqiang Fan. 2019. Deep fusion network for image completion. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on multimedia. 2033-2042.
  20. Shih-Cheng Huang, Anuj Pareek, Roham Zamanian, Imon Banerjee, and Matthew P Lungren. 2020. Multimodal fusion with deep neural networks for leveraging CT imaging and electronic health record: a case-study in pulmonary embolism detection. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 1-9.
  21. Yawen Huang. 2018. Cross-Modality Feature Learning for Three-Dimensional Brain Image Synthesis. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Sheffield.
  22. Zhao Kang, Chong Peng, and Qiang Cheng. 2017. Kernel-driven similarity learning. Neurocomputing 267 (2017), 210-219.
  23. Zhao Kang, Chong Peng, Ming Yang, and Qiang Cheng. 2016. Top-n recommen- dation on graphs. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2101-2106.
  24. Joon Mo Kim, Ki Ho Park, So Young Han, Kwan Soo Kim, Dong Myung Kim, Tae Woo Kim, and Joseph Caprioli. 2012. Changes in intraocular pressure after pharmacologic pupil dilation. BMC ophthalmology 12, 1 (2012), 1-5.
  25. Wonjae Kim, Bokyung Son, and Ildoo Kim. 2021. ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervision. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. 5583-5594.
  26. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016). · arXiv
  27. Jacek Kwiecinski, Evangelos Tzolos, Timothy RG Cartlidge, Alexander Fletcher, Mhairi K Doris, Rong Bing, Jason M Tarkin, Michael A Seidman, Gaurav S Gulsin, Nicholas L Cruden, et al. 2021. Native aortic valve disease progression and bioprosthetic valve degeneration in patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circulation 144, 17 (2021), 1396.
  28. Linchao Li, Bowen Du, Yonggang Wang, Lingqiao Qin, and Huachun Tan. 2020. Estimation of missing values in heterogeneous traffic data: Application of multi- modal deep learning model. Knowledge-Based Systems 194 (2020), 105592.
  29. Wei-Chao Lin and Chih-Fong Tsai. 2020. Missing value imputation: a review and analysis of the literature (2006-2017). Artificial Intelligence Review 53, 2 (2020), 1487-1509.
  30. Feng Liu, Wenkai Xu, Jie Lu, Guangquan Zhang, Arthur Gretton, and Dougal J Sutherland. 2020. Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Tests. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.09116 (2020). · arXiv
  31. Liantao Ma, Junyi Gao, Yasha Wang, Chaohe Zhang, Jiangtao Wang, Wenjie Ruan, Wen Tang, Xin Gao, and Xinyu Ma. 2020. AdaCare: AdaCare: Explainable Clinical Health Status Representation Learning via Scale-Adaptive Feature Extraction and Recalibration. In Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  32. Liantao Ma, Xinyu Ma, Junyi Gao, Xianfeng Jiao, Zhihao Yu, Chaohe Zhang, Wenjie Ruan, Yasha Wang, Wen Tang, and Jiangtao Wang. 2021. Distilling Knowledge from Publicly Available Online EMR Data to Emerging Epidemic for Prognosis. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 3558-3568.
  33. Liantao Ma, Chaohe Zhang, Yasha Wang, Wenjie Ruan, Jiangtao Wang, Wen Tang, Xinyu Ma, Xin Gao, and Junyi Gao. 2020. ConCare: Personalized Clinical Feature Embedding via Capturing the Healthcare Context. In Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  34. Cynthia Matossian, John Hovanesian, Jason Bacharach, Dario Paggiarino, and Keyur Patel. 2020. Impact of dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% on intraocular pressure after routine cataract surgery: post hoc analysis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 47, 1 (2020), 53.
  35. Jiquan Ngiam, Aditya Khosla, Mingyu Kim, Juhan Nam, Honglak Lee, and An- drew Y Ng. 2011. Multimodal deep learning. In ICML.
  36. Yongsheng Pan, Mingxia Liu, Yong Xia, and Dinggang Shen. 2021. Disease-image- specific Learning for Diagnosis-oriented Neuroimage Synthesis with Incomplete Multi-Modality Data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence (2021).
  37. Sharmila Rajendrababu, Srilekha Pallamparthy, Anusha Arunachalam, Mo- hammed Sithiq Uduman, Senthilkumari Srinivasan, SR Krishnadas, and Vijay- alakshmi A Senthilkumar. 2021. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative intraocular pressure response to topical prednisolone eye drops in patients under- going phacoemulsification. International Ophthalmology 41, 12 (2021), 3999-4007.
  38. Pedro Ramos-Cabrer, JPM Van Duynhoven, A Van der Toorn, and K Nicolay. 2004. MRI of hip prostheses using single-point methods: in vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants. Magnetic resonance imaging 22, 8 (2004), 1097-1103.
  39. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 5998-6008.
  40. Qi Wang, Liang Zhan, Paul Thompson, and Jiayu Zhou. 2020. Multimodal Learn- ing with Incomplete Modalities by Knowledge Distillation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1828-1838.
  41. Chang Xu, Dacheng Tao, and Chao Xu. 2013. A survey on multi-view learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.5634 (2013). · arXiv
  42. Xiuwen Yi, Yu Zheng, Junbo Zhang, and Tianrui Li. 2016. ST-MVL: filling missing values in geo-sensory time series data. In Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  43. Wenhao Yu, Wei Peng, Yu Shu, Qingkai Zeng, and Meng Jiang. 2020. Experi- mental evidence extraction system in data science with hybrid table features and ensemble learning. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 951-961.
  44. Chaohe Zhang, Xin Gao, Liantao Ma, Yasha Wang, Jiangtao Wang, and Wen Tang. 2021. GRASP: Generic Framework for Health Status Representation Learning Based on Incorporating Knowledge from Similar Patients. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 715-723.
  45. Changqing Zhang, Zongbo Han, Yajie Cui, Huazhu Fu, Joey Tianyi Zhou, and Qinghua Hu. 2019. CPM-nets: cross partial multi-view networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 559-569.
  46. Xi Zhang, Jingyuan Chou, and Fei Wang. 2018. Integrative analysis of patient health records and neuroimages via memory-based graph convolutional network. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 767-776.
  47. Tao Zhou, Huazhu Fu, Geng Chen, Jianbing Shen, and Ling Shao. 2020. Hi-net: hybrid-fusion network for multi-modal MR image synthesis. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 39, 9 (2020), 2772-2781.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, C., Chu, X., Ma, L., Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, J., & Zhao, J.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Coventry University (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2022-08-14
Pages
2418-2428
OpenAlex
W4290944617
Cited by
102
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11
FWCI
9.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021TQ0011)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62172011)
  • EPSRC New Investigator Award (EP/V043544/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
missing modalities, missing data imputation, end-to-end learning, patient similarity, clinical analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review