Cited by 21Innovative Human-Technology InteractionDesign Education and PracticeArt, Technology, and Culture

Research Products at Scale: Learnings from Designing Devices in Multiples of Ones, Tens, Hundreds and Thousands

Open access
Boucher, Andy·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that scale is an important quality of research products [32] and reflect upon the lessons learnt from designing and producing research products at scales ranging from one-offs to those reproduced in thousands. I describe details from a body of research completed by our studio over twenty years by examining four research projects that were designed, developed, and manufactured at four distinct levels of scale. I draw out details from these projects that have not previously been reported and discuss the methodological implications of growth not just for design and production, but also for strategies for engaging with participants. In addition, I discuss particular features of research products produced at the four levels of scale and describe the benefits and trade-offs of producing research products at different scales.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3544548.3581540

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Framing the scaling challenge through the HCI lens of 'research products' clarifies the particular demands of scaling the Ryelands AI Lab by articulating a design space with constraints.

    “To frame this challenge productively, we are considering to frame it through the established HCI lens of 'research products' [68] developed by Odom and colleagues and recently expanded precisely in the dimension of 'scale' [16] by Boucher, as this clarifies the particular demands of scaling the Ryelands AI Lab by articulating a design space with constraints.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Andy Boucher, Dean Brown, Liliana Ovalle, Andy Sheen, Mike Vanis, William Odom, Doenja Oogjes, and William Gaver. 2018. TaskCam: Designing and Testing an Open Tool for Cultural Probes Studies. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1-12.
  2. David Cameron, Nadine Jarvis, and Andy Boucher. 2014. Designing Deployment: a visual paper of the batch deployment of research prototypes. Proceedings of DRS2014 International Conference, Design Research Society, 898-909.
  3. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Bloomsbury Visual Arts, London.
  4. William Gaver. 2020. The Presence Project, Second Edition. Goldsmiths Press / MIT Press.
  5. William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Michail Vanis, Andy Sheen, Dean Brown, Liliana Ovalle, Naho Matsuda, Amina Abbas-Nazari, and Robert Phillips. 2019. My Na- turewatch Camera: Disseminating Practice Research with a Cheap and Easy DIY Design. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1-13.
  6. William W. Gaver, John Bowers, Andrew Boucher, Hans Gellerson, Sarah Pen- nington, Albrecht Schmidt, Anthony Steed, Nicholas Villars, and Brendan Walker. 2004. The Drift Table: Designing for Ludic Engagement. CHI '04 Extended Ab- stracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, 885-900.
  7. Sarah Homewood, Harvey Bewley, and Laurens Boer. 2019. Ovum: Designing for Fertility Tracking as a Shared and Domestic Experience. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, 553-565.
  8. Rohit Ashok Khot, Jung-Ying (Lois) Yi, and Deepti Aggarwal. 2020. SWAN: De- signing a Companion Spoon for Mindful Eating. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Association for Computing Machinery, 743-756.
  9. Pimoroni. Pimoroni Ltd: Purveyors of Maker Goods. Retrieved September 15, 2022 from https://shop.pimoroni.com/. CHI '23, April 23-28, 2023, Hamburg, Germany

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boucher, A.
Affiliations
Northumbria University (GB)
Corresponding author
Boucher, Andy
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-04-19
Pages
1-15
OpenAlex
W4366548902
Cited by
21
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GR/N15986/01, EP/P006256/1)
  • European Research Council (Grant agreement ID: 226528)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
Keywords
research products, scale, design and production, manufacturing industry, participant engagement, iterative design, prototype development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review