Cited by 16Innovative Human-Technology InteractionChild Development and Digital TechnologyEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Child-Centred AI Design: Definition, Operation, and Considerations

Open access
Wang, Ge, Sun, Kaiwen, Atabey, Ayça, Pothong, Kruakae, Lin, Grace C., Zhao, Jun, Yip, Jason·2023·Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

AI systems and related algorithms are starting to play a variety of roles in the digital ecosystems of children - being embedded in the connected toys, smart home IoT technologies, apps, and services they interact with on a daily basis. Going forward, AI systems will, in all likelihood, become even more pervasive in children’s applications simply due to their sheer usefulness in creating compelling, adaptive, and personal user experiences. Yet, understanding the ways that AI-driven systems used by children operate, and how AI could be designed to better anticipate and respond to children’s diverse requirements is still a new and emerging area of investigation. Our goals of this workshop are to (1) extend the current critically constructive dialogue around the meaning of child-centred AI design and (2) explore ways to operationalise such child-centred AI design in practice, and finally (3) further expand and foster a community for those who are interested in designing and developing child-centred AI systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3544549.3573821

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kaiwen Sun, Yixin Zou, Jenny Radesky, Christopher Brooks, and Florian Schaub. 2021. Child Safety in the Smart Home: Parents' Perceptions, Needs, and Mitigation Strategies. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1-41.
  2. John Zimmerman and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Research through design in HCI. In Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, 167-189.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, G., Sun, K., Atabey, A., Pothong, K., Lin, G. C., Zhao, J., & Yip, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Laser Scan Engineering (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-04-19
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4366597739
Cited by
16
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
AI-driven personalization, design community, children's technology use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review