The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols
Abstract
The process of fixation identification—separating and labeling fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols—is an essential part of eye-movement data analysis and can have a dramatic impact on higher-level analyses. However, algorithms for performing fixation identification are often described informally and rarely compared in a meaningful way. In this paper we propose a taxonomy of fixation identification algorithms that classifies algorithms in terms of how they utilize spatial and temporal information in eye-tracking protocols. Using this taxonomy, we describe five algorithms that are representative of different classes in the taxonomy and are based on commonly employed techniques. We then evaluate and compare these algorithms with respect to a number of qualitative characteristics. The results of these comparisons offer interesting implications for the use of the various algorithms in future work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Cited by
(2016) · doi:10.3389/fpsyg · Cited by 801
Saliency in VR: How Do People Explore Virtual Environments?
Sitzmann, V., Serrano, A., Pavel, A., Agrawala, M., Gutierrez, D., Masia, B., & Wetzstein, G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2793599 · Cited by 459
Baby schema in human and animal faces induces cuteness perception and gaze allocation in children
Borgi, M., Cogliati-Dezza, I., Brelsford, V., Meints, K., & Cirulli, F. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00411 · Cited by 243
The effect of short-form video addiction on users’ attention
Chen, Y., Li, M., Guo, F., & Wang, X. (2023) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2151512 · Cited by 185
Bekele, E., Zheng, Z., Swanson, A., Crittendon, J., Warren, Z., & Sarkar, N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.42 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Salvucci, D. D., & Goldberg, J. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the symposium on Eye tracking research & applications - ETRA '00
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2000
- Pages
- 71-78
- OpenAlex
- W1965305672
- Cited by
- 2,203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/355017.355028
- The paper
- Salvucci, D. D., & Goldberg, J. H. (2000). Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. Proceedings of the symposium on Eye tracking research & applications - ETRA '00. https://doi.org/10.1145/355017.355028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.