Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

External manifestations of trustworthiness in the interface

Open access
Cassell, Justine, Bickmore, Timothy·2000·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

The article is about the kind of trust normally demonstrated in face-to-face human interaction, along with approaches to and benefits from having computer interfaces employ these same manifestations of trustworthiness. It argues that interaction rituals among humans, including greetings small talk, and conventional leave-takings along with their manifestations in speech and in embodied conversational behaviors, can lead users to judge the technology as more reliable, competent and knowledgeable, that is, to trust the technology more. Some degree of trust is required to engage in cooperative behavior. Conversation, in particular, requires cooperation and mutual trust to function smoothly. Trust may be established using the same myriad social cues people use in face-to-face conversation, including interaction rituals, such as small talk, to incrementally build evidence of the embodied conversational agents goodwill and credibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/355112.355123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Berscheid , E. and Reis , H . Attraction and close relationships . In The Handbook of Social Psychology , D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, Eds. McGraw-Hill , New York , 1998 . Berscheid, E. and Reis, H. Attraction and close relationships. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, Eds. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998.
  2. 10.1145/332051.332075 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1145/633292.633443 · DOI
  4. 10.1023/A:1010027123541 · DOI
  5. Goffman , E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life . Doubleday , New York , 1959 . Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York, 1959.
  6. Moon , Y. When the Computer is the 'Salesperson': Consumer Responses to Computer 'Personalities' in Interactive Marketing Situations. Harvard Business School 99 - 041 , 1999 . Moon, Y. When the Computer is the 'Salesperson': Consumer Responses to Computer 'Personalities' in Interactive Marketing Situations. Harvard Business School 99-041, 1999.
  7. Nass , C. , Isbister , K , Truth is beauty: Researching embodied conversational agents . In Embodied Conversational Agents, J. Cassell et al., Eds . MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 1999 . Nass, C., Isbister, K, et al. Truth is beauty: Researching embodied conversational agents. In Embodied Conversational Agents, J. Cassell et al., Eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
  8. Pearce , W. Trust in interpersonal communication. Speech Mo no. 41 , 3 ( Aug. 1974 ), 236-244. Pearce, W. Trust in interpersonal communication. Speech Mono. 41, 3 (Aug. 1974), 236-244.
  9. Prentice , D. The effects of trust-destroying communication on verbal fluency in the small group. Speech Mo no. 42 , 4 ( Nov. 1974 ), 262-270. Prentice, D. The effects of trust-destroying communication on verbal fluency in the small group. Speech Mono. 42, 4 (Nov. 1974), 262-270.
  10. Schneider , K. Small Talk : Analysing Phatic Discourse . Hitzeroth , Marburg, Germany , 1988 . Schneider, K. Small Talk: Analysing Phatic Discourse. Hitzeroth, Marburg, Germany, 1988.
  11. Smith , J. GrandChair : Conversational Collection of Grandparents' Stories Using an Autonomous Animated Character . MIT Media Lab , Masters Thesis , 2000 . Smith, J. GrandChair: Conversational Collection of Grandparents' Stories Using an Autonomous Animated Character. MIT Media Lab, Masters Thesis, 2000.

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Cassell, J., & Bickmore, T.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2000-12
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
50-56
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2054562387
Cited by
255
References
1
FWCI
19.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.