The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments
Open accessAbstract
Using while moving" is the basic ability fieldwork users require of a mobile computer system.These users come from a wide range of backgrounds but have in common an extremely mobile and dynamic workplace.We identify four specific characteristics of this class of users: dynamic user configuration, limited attention capacity, high-speed interaction, and context dependency.A prototype is then presented that was designed to assist fieldworkers in data collection tasks and to explore the HCI design issues involved.The prototype was used in an extensive field trial by a group of ecologists observing giraffe behavior in Kenya.Following this trial, improvements were made to the prototype interface which in turn was tested in a subsequent field trial with another group of ecologists.From this experience, we have formulated our resulting ideas about interface design for fieldworkers into two general principles: Minimal Attention User Interfaces (MAUIs) and context awareness.The MAUI seeks to minimize the attention, though not necessarily the number of interactions, required from the user in operating a device.Context awareness enables the mobile device to provide assistance based on a knowledge of its environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI
Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., & Kuorelahti, J. (2005) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1054972.1055101 · Cited by 576
Kane, S. K., Jayant, C., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/1639642.1639663 · Cited by 383
A Review of Mobile HCI Research Methods
Kjeldskov, J., & Graham, C. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45233-1_23 · Cited by 375
Usability evaluation for mobile device: a comparison of laboratory and field tests
Duh, H. B.-L., Tan, G. C. B., & Chen, V. H.-H. (2006) · Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services · doi:10.1145/1152215.1152254 · Cited by 210
Perceived Ubiquity in Mobile Services
Okazaki, S., & Mendez, F. (2013) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.10.001 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Pascoe, J., Ryan, N., & Morse, D.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-437
- ISSN
- 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7325
- OpenAlex
- W1971733068
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/355324.355329
- The paper
- Pascoe, J., Ryan, N., & Morse, D. (2000). Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/355324.355329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.