Cited by 72Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsIoT-based Smart Home Systems

Explainable Activity Recognition for Smart Home Systems

Open access
Das, Devleena, Nishimura, Yasutaka, Vivek, Rajan P., Takeda, Naoto, Fish, Sean T., Plötz, Thomas, Chernova, Sonia·2023·ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Smart home environments are designed to provide services that help improve the quality of life for the occupant via a variety of sensors and actuators installed throughout the space. Many automated actions taken by a smart home are governed by the output of an underlying activity recognition system. However, activity recognition systems may not be perfectly accurate, and therefore inconsistencies in smart home operations can lead users reliant on smart home predictions to wonder “Why did the smart home do that?” In this work, we build on insights from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques and introduce an explainable activity recognition framework in which we leverage leading XAI methods (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Anchors) to generate natural language explanations that explain what about an activity led to the given classification. We evaluate our framework in the context of a commonly targeted smart home scenario: autonomous remote caregiver monitoring for individuals who are living alone or need assistance. Within the context of remote caregiver monitoring, we perform a two-step evaluation: (a) utilize Machine Learning experts to assess the sensibility of explanations and (b) recruit non-experts in two user remote caregiver monitoring scenarios, synchronous and asynchronous, to assess the effectiveness of explanations generated via our framework. Our results show that the XAI approach, SHAP, has a 92% success rate in generating sensible explanations. Moreover, in 83% of sampled scenarios users preferred natural language explanations over a simple activity label, underscoring the need for explainable activity recognition systems. Finally, we show that explanations generated by some XAI methods can lead users to lose confidence in the accuracy of the underlying activity recognition model, while others lead users to gain confidence. Taking all studied factors into consideration, we make a recommendation regarding which existing XAI method leads to the best performance in the domain of smart home automation and discuss a range of topics for future work to further improve explainable activity recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3561533

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, D., Nishimura, Y., Vivek, R. P., Takeda, N., Fish, S. T., Plötz, T., & Chernova, S.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • KDDI Research (Japan) (JP)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
Published
2023-05-05
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
1-39
ISSN
  • 2160-6455 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-6463
OpenAlex
W3162602085
Cited by
70
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 5
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • KDDI Research
  • NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1650044)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT-based Smart Home Systems
Keywords
smart home automation, explainable AI, SHAP, lime, anchors, natural language explanations, user trust in AI, living alone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review