Cited by 75Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Faithful Multimodal Explanation for Visual Question Answering

Open access
Wu, Jialin, Mooney, Raymond·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP

Abstract

AI systems' ability to explain their reasoning is critical to their utility and trustworthiness.Deep neural networks have enabled significant progress on many challenging problems such as visual question answering (VQA).However, most of them are opaque black boxes with limited explanatory capability.This paper presents a novel approach to developing a high-performing VQA system that can elucidate its answers with integrated textual and visual explanations that faithfully reflect important aspects of its underlying reasoning process while capturing the style of comprehensible human explanations.Extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates the advantages of this approach compared to competing methods using both automated metrics and human evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/w19-4812

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Faithful Multimodal (FM) model aims at grounding parts of generated explanations in the input image to provide explanations that are faithful to the input image.

    “The Faithful Multimodal (FM) model [53] aims at grounding parts of generated explanations in the input image to provide explanations that are faithful to the input image.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stanislaw Antol, Aishwarya Agrawal, Jiasen Lu, Mar- garet Mitchell, Dhruv Batra, C Lawrence Zitnick, and Devi Parikh. 2015. VQA: Visual question an- swering. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2425-2433.
  2. Andrew L Maas, Awni Y Hannun, and Andrew Y Ng. 2013. Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Net- work Acoustic Models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 30, page 3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J., & Mooney, R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
Published
2019
Pages
103-112
OpenAlex
W2973009097
Cited by
73
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Air Force Research Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
visual question answering, multimodal explanations, explainable AI, model interpretability, black-box models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review