Cited by 14Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The Barriers to Online Clothing Websites for Visually Impaired People: An Interview and Observation Approach to Understanding Needs

Open access
Alluqmani, Amnah, Harvey, Morgan A, Zhang, Ziqi·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Abstract

Visually impaired (VI) people often face challenges when performing everyday tasks and identify shopping for clothes as one of the most challenging. Many engage in online shopping, which eliminates some challenges of physical shopping. However, clothes shopping online suffers from many other limitations and barriers. More research is needed to address these challenges, and extant works often base their findings on interviews alone, providing only subjective, recall-biased information. We conducted two complementary studies using both observational and interview approaches to fill a gap in understanding about VI people’s behaviour when selecting and purchasing clothes online. Our findings show that shopping websites suffer from inaccurate, misleading, and contradictory clothing descriptions; that VI people mainly rely on (unreliable) search tools and check product descriptions by reviewing customer comments. Our findings also indicate that VI people are hesitant to accept assistance from automated, but that trust in such systems could be improved if researchers can develop systems that better accommodate users’ needs and preferences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3563657.3595978

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]1. Hamza Alshenqeeti. 2014. Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research 3, 1 (2014), 39-45.
  2. [4]4. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77-101.
  3. [7]7. Milagros Castillo-Montoya. 2016. Preparing for Interview Research: The Inter- view Protocol Refnement Framework. Qualitative Report 21, 5 (2016).
  4. [8]8. Chaorui Deng, Ning Ding, Mingkui Tan, and Qi Wu. 2020. Length-controllable image captioning. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIII 16. Springer, 712-729.
  5. [9]9. Maryam Dikko. 2016. Establishing Construct Validity and Reliability: Pilot Testing of a Qualitative Interview for Research in Takaful (Islamic Insurance). Qualitative Report 21, 3 (2016).
  6. [12]12. Narges Yarahmadi Gharaei, Chitra Dadkhah, and Lorence Daryoush. 2021. Content-based clothing recommender system using deep neural network. In 2021 26th International Computer Conference, Computer Society of Iran (CSICC). IEEE, 1-6.
  7. [22]22. Jihyuk Park, Yeji Han, and Uran Oh. 2020. Understanding Smartphone-based Online Shopping Experiences and Behaviors of Blind Users. International journal of advanced smart convergence 9, 3 (2020), 260-271.
  8. [29]29. Michael Whitney. 2020. Teaching Accessible Design: Integrating Accessibility Principles and Practices into an Introductory Web Design Course. Information Systems Education Journal 18, 1 (2020), 4-13.
  9. [34]34. John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, Anthony Tomasic, and Oscar J. Romero. 2022. Recentering Reframing as an RtD Contribution: The Case of Pivoting from Accessible Web Tables to a Conversational Internet. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alluqmani, A., Harvey, M. A., & Zhang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Umm al-Qura University (SA)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2023-07-10
Pages
753-764
OpenAlex
W4383679920
Cited by
14
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
5.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Designing Interactive Systems Conference (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
visually impaired people, online clothing shopping, accessibility, barriers to online shopping, clothing description, search tools, customer reviews, user needs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review