Cited by 66Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityUsability and User Interface Design

BrowseWithMe: An Online Clothes Shopping Assistant for People with Visual Impairments

Open access
Stangl, Abigale J., Kothari, Esha, Jain, Suyog D., Yeh, Tom, Grauman, Kristen, Gurari, Danna·2018·Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility

Abstract

Our interviews with people who have visual impairments show clothes shopping is an important activity in their lives. Unfortunately, clothes shopping web sites remain largely inaccessible. We propose design recommendations to address online accessibility issues reported by visually impaired study participants and an implementation, which we call BrowseWithMe, to address these issues. BrowseWithMe employs artificial intelligence to automatically convert a product web page into a structured representation that enables a user to interactively ask the BrowseWithMe system what the user wants to learn about a product (e.g., What is the price? Can I see a magnified image of the pants?). This enables people to be active solicitors of the specific information they are seeking rather than passive listeners of unparsed information. Experiments demonstrate BrowseWithMe can make online clothes shopping more accessible and produce accurate image descriptions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3234695.3236337

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People who are blind or have low vision rely on the Internet to access information and perform everyday tasks, such as shopping for essential items and managing personal finances.

    “People who are blind or have low vision rely on the Internet to access information and perform everyday tasks, such as shopping for essential items and managing personal finances [46].”

    From From Cluttered to Clear: Improving the Web Accessibility Design for Screen Reader Users in E-commerce With Generative AI (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction and Obtaining Product Information sections discuss online shopping and using websites to obtain product information for people who are blind or have low vision. The paper focuses on clothes shopping; it does not support the broader examples of shopping for essential items or managing personal finances. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing solutions primarily target specific elements rather than ensuring a comprehensive, end-to-end accessible experience across the entire web page.

    “However, these existing solutions primarily target specific elements, such as product descriptions or image retrieval, rather than ensuring a comprehensive, end-to-end accessible experience across the entire web page, particularly for users who may be unfamiliar with a new platform.”
  • Inadequate descriptions of images and unparsed text information significantly reduce BLV consumers' engagement with online shopping websites.

    “Hence, inadequate descriptions of images and unparsed text information significantly reduce BLV consumers' engagement with online shopping websites [30, 31].”
  • Online reviews have been mentioned as a useful resource to assist BLV customers' desire for more product information.

    “Online reviews have been mentioned as an useful resource to assist BLV customers' desire for more product information [16, 30, 31], such as supporting question-answering[20, 36] and generating summaries [12, 15].”
  • BLV users face significant barriers on online shopping websites due to inadequate image descriptions and screen readers' inability to filter out a large amount of information on a product page.

    “However, prior studies [30, 31] show that BLV people still face significant barriers on online shopping websites due to inadequate image descriptions and screen readers' inability to filter out a large amount of information on a product page.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [14]14. T. B. Dinesh, S Uskudarli, S. Sastry, D. Aggarwal, and V. Choppella. 2012. Alipi: A framework for re-narrating web pages. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility.
  2. [19]19. S. Harper and A. Q. Chen. 2012. Web accessibility guidelines. Web accessibility guidelines 15, 1 (2012), 61-88.
  3. [27]27. S. Kesh, S. V. Venkateshwar, and A. U. 2017. Shopping By Blind People: Detection of Interactions in Ambient Assisted Living Environments using RFID. In International Journal of Wireless Communications and Networking Technologies, Vol. 6. 7-11.
  4. [51]51. Y. Zhong, W. S. Lasecki, E. Brady, and J. P. Bigham. 2015. Regionspeak: Quick comprehensive spatial descriptions of complex images for blind users. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 2353-2362. Session 3: Accessing Information ASSETS'18, October 22-24, 2018, Galway, Ireland

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stangl, A. J., Kothari, E., Jain, S. D., Yeh, T., Grauman, K., & Gurari, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-10-08
Pages
107-118
OpenAlex
W2896108493
Cited by
66
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IIS-1755593)
  • Amazon Research Award
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
visual impairment, web accessibility, assistive technology, image description generation, natural language question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review