The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Symbiotic jobscheduling for a simultaneous mutlithreading processor
Open accessAbstract
Simultaneous Multithreading machines fetch and execute instructions from multiple instruction streams to increase system utilization and speedup the execution of jobs. When there are more jobs in the system than there is hardware to support simultaneous execution, the operating system scheduler must choose the set of jobs to coscheduleThis paper demonstrates that performance on a hardware multithreaded processor is sensitive to the set of jobs that are coscheduled by the operating system jobscheduler. Thus, the full benefits of SMT hardware can only be achieved if the scheduler is aware of thread interactions. Here, a mechanism is presented that allows the scheduler to significantly raise the performance of SMT architectures. This is done without any advance knowledge of a workload's characteristics, using sampling to identify jobs which run well together.We demonstrate an SMT jobscheduler called SOS. SOS combines an overhead-free sample phase which collects information about various possible schedules, and a symbiosis phase which uses that information to predict which schedule will provide the best performance. We show that a small sample of the possible schedules is sufficient to identify a good schedule quickly. On a system with random job arrivals and departures, response time is improved as much as 17% over a schedule which does not incorporate symbiosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ritchie, D. M., & Thompson, K. (1974) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/361011.361061 · Cited by 826
Cited by
RAIDR: Retention-Aware Intelligent DRAM Refresh
Liu, J., Jaiyen, B., Veras, R., & Mutlu, O. (2012) · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · doi:10.1145/2366231.2337161 · Cited by 444
Cooperative Caching for Chip Multiprocessors
Chang, J., & Sohi, G. S. (2006) · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · doi:10.1145/1150019.1136509 · Cited by 355
An evaluation of speculative instruction execution on simultaneous multithreaded processors
Swanson, S., McDowell, L. K., Swift, M. M., Eggers, S. J., & Levy, H. M. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/859716.859720 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Snavely, A., & Tullsen, D. M.
- Venue
- ACM SIGPLAN Notices
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 234-244
- ISSN
- 0362-1340 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1160
- OpenAlex
- W2103397328
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Symbiotic jobscheduling for a simultaneous mutlithreading processor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/356989.357011
- The paper
- Snavely, A., & Tullsen, D. M. (2000). Symbiotic jobscheduling for a simultaneous mutlithreading processor. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. https://doi.org/10.1145/356989.357011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.