The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications
Open accessAbstract
A six-step, iterative, empirical human factors design methodology was used to develop CAL, a natural language computer application to help computer-naive business professionals manage their personal calendars.Input language is processed by a simple, nonparsing algorithm with limited storage requirements and a quick response time.CAL allows unconstrained English inputs from users with no training (except for a five minute introduction to the keyboard and display) and no manual (except for a two-page overview of the system).In a controlled test of performance, CAL correctly responded to between 86 percent and 97 percent of the storage and retrieval requests it received, according to various criteria.This level of performance could never have been achieved with such a simple processing model were it not for the empirical approach used in the development of the program and its dictionaries.The tools of the engineering psychologist are clearly invaluable in the development of user-friendly software, if that software is to accommodate the unruly language of computer-naive, first-time users.The key is to elicit the cooperation of such users as partners in an iterative, empirical development process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MultiWOZ - A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modelling
Budzianowski, P., Wen, T.-H., Tseng, B.-H., Casanueva, I., Ultes, S., Ramadan, O., & Gašić, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1547 · Cited by 1,028
Advancing the Aging and Technology Agenda in Gerontology
Schulz, R., Wahl, H.-W., Matthews, J. T., De Vito Dabbs, A., Beach, S. R., & Czaja, S. J. (2015) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnu071 · Cited by 449
Suede: a Wizard of Oz prototyping tool for speech user interfaces
Klemmer, S. R., Sinha, A. K., Chen, J., Landay, J. A., Aboobaker, N., & Wang, A. (2000) · Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '00 · doi:10.1145/354401.354406 · Cited by 230
Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems
Park, J. S., Popowski, L., Cai, C., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3526113.3545616 · Cited by 212
Designing Relational Agents as Long Term Social Companions for Older Adults
Vardoulakis, L. P., Ring, L., Barry, B., Sidner, C. L., & Bickmore, T. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33197-8_30 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelley, J. F.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-41
- ISSN
- 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2868
- OpenAlex
- W1969152782
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/357417.357420
- The paper
- Kelley, J. F. (1984). An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/357417.357420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.