Cited by 112Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMisinformation and Its Impacts

Deep convolutional pooling transformer for deepfake detection

Open access
Wang, Tianyi, Cheng, Harry, Chow, Kam Pui, Nie, Liqiang·2023·ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications

Abstract

Recently, Deepfake has drawn considerable public attention due to security and privacy concerns in social media digital forensics. As the wildly spreading Deepfake videos on the Internet become more realistic, traditional detection techniques have failed in distinguishing between real and fake. Most existing deep learning methods mainly focus on local features and relations within the face image using convolutional neural networks as a backbone. However, local features and relations are insufficient for model training to learn enough general information for Deepfake detection. Therefore, the existing Deepfake detection methods have reached a bottleneck to further improve the detection performance. To address this issue, we propose a deep convolutional Transformer to incorporate the decisive image features both locally and globally. Specifically, we apply convolutional pooling and re-attention to enrich the extracted features and enhance efficacy. Moreover, we employ the barely discussed image keyframes in model training for performance improvement and visualize the feature quantity gap between the key and normal image frames caused by video compression. We finally illustrate the transferability with extensive experiments on several Deepfake benchmark datasets. The proposed solution consistently outperforms several state-of-the-art baselines on both within- and cross-dataset experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3588574

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Augmenting training datasets with diverse samples, employing transfer learning from pre-trained models, and integrating attention mechanisms can enhance generalization capabilities.

    “Augmenting training datasets with diverse samples, employing transfer learning from pre-trained models, and integrating attention mechanisms can enhance generalization capabilities [45].”

    From A Comprehensive Review of DeepFake Detection Using Advanced Machine Learning and Fusion Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [45]

    Section 4.4 reports better performance from augmenting a limited keyframe training set and from combining keyframes with normal frames. Section 4.5 reports that re-attention improves cross-dataset performance. The Introduction and Section 2.2 mention pre-trained CNNs used by earlier approaches, but do not show that transfer learning from pre-trained models improves generalization; the claim therefore combines supported findings with an unsupported component. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [2]2. Irene Amerini, Leonardo Galteri, Roberto Caldelli, and Alberto Del Bimbo. 2019. Deepfake video detection through optical flow based CNN. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop. IEEE, 1205-1207.
  2. [6]6. Renwang Chen, Xuanhong Chen, Bingbing Ni, and Yanhao Ge. 2020. SimSwap: An efficient framework for high fidelity face swapping. In Proceedings of the MM'20: The 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia.
  3. [7]7. Francois Chollet. 2017. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patten Recognition. 1251-1258.
  4. [12]12. Brian Dolhansky, Joanna Bitton, Ben Pflaum, Jikuo Lu, Russ Howes, Menglin Wang, and Cristian Canton Ferrer. 2020. The DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Dataset. arXiv:cs.CV/2006.07397. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2006.07397. Accessed August 29, 2021.
  5. [13]13. Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. 2021. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In Proceedings of the International Confer- ence on Learning Representations.
  6. [16]16. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, and K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Vol. 27. Curran Associates, Inc.
  7. [19]19. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patten Recognition. IEEE, 770-778.
  8. [21]21. Byeongho Heo, Sangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Junsuk Choe, and Seong Joon Oh. 2021. Rethinking spatial dimensions of vision transformers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision.
  9. [22]22. Mousa Tayseer Jafar, Mohammad Ababneh, Mohammad Al-Zoube, and Ammar Elhassan. 2020. Forensics and analysis of deepfake videos. In Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems. IEEE, 053-058.
  10. [23]23. Liming Jiang, Ren Li, Wayne Wu, Chen Qian, and Chen Change Loy. 2020. DeeperForensics-1.0: A large-scale dataset for real-world face forgery detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patten Recognition. 2889-2898.
  11. [30]30. Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. 2014. Auto-encoding variational bayes. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada, April 14-16, 2014, Conference Track Proceedings, Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun (Eds.).
  12. [31]31. Patrick Kwon, Jaeseong You, Gyuhyeon Nam, Sungwoo Park, and Gyeongsu Chae. 2021. KoDF: A large-scale Korean deepfake detection dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 10744-10753.
  13. [33]33. Yuezun Li, Xin Yang, Pu Sun, Honggang Qi, and Siwei Lyu. 2020. Celeb-DF: A large-scale challenging dataset for deepfake forensics. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patten Recognition. 3207-3216.
  14. [35]35. Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. 2021. Swin trans- former: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision.
  15. [36]36. Yuchen Luo, Yong Zhang, Junchi Yan, and Wei Liu. 2021. Generalizing face forgery detection with high-frequency features. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patten Recognition (CVPR). 16317-16326.
  16. [41]41. Ivan Perov, Daiheng Gao, Nikolay Chervoniy, Kunlin Liu, Sugasa Marangonda, Chris Umé, Mr. Dpfks, Carl Shift Facen- heim, Luis R. P., Jian Jiang, Sheng Zhang, Pingyu Wu, Bo Zhou, and Weiming Zhang. 2021. DeepFaceLab: Integrated, flexible and extensible face-swapping framework. arXiv:cs.CV/2005.05535. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2005. 05535. Accessed August 29, 2021.
  17. [43]43. Andreas Rossler, Davide Cozzolino, Luisa Verdoliva, Christian Riess, Justus Thies, and Matthias Niessner. 2019. Face- Forensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 1-11.
  18. [45]45. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2015. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). IEEE.
  19. [47]47. Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. 2019. EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In Pro- ceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research), Vol. 97. PMLR, 6105-6114.
  20. [50]50. Justus Thies, Michael Zollhofer, Marc Stamminger, Christian Theobalt, and Matthias Niessner. 2016. Face2Face: Real- time face capture and reenactment of RGB videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patten Recognition (CVPR). 2387-2395.
  21. [53]53. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, I.
  22. [54]54. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Eds.), Vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
  23. [63]63. Hanqing Zhao, Wenbo Zhou, Dongdong Chen, Tianyi Wei, Weiming Zhang, and Nenghai Yu. 2021. Multi-attentional deepfake detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patten Recognition. 2185-2194.
  24. [64]64. Jian Zhao, Yu Cheng, Yan Xu, Lin Xiong, Jianshu Li, Fang Zhao, Karlekar Jayashree, Sugiri Pranata, Shengmei Shen, Junliang Xing, et al. 2018. Towards pose invariant face recognition in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Patten Recognition. 2207-2216.
  25. [67]67. Jian Zhao, Lin Xiong, Panasonic Karlekar Jayashree, Jianshu Li, Fang Zhao, Zhecan Wang, Panasonic Sugiri Pranata, Panasonic Shengmei Shen, Shuicheng Yan, and Jiashi Feng. 2017. Dual-agent GANs for photorealistic and identity preserving profile face synthesis. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, I.
  26. [68]68. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (Eds.), Vol. 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
  27. [70]70. Yuhao Zhu, Qi Li, Jian Wang, Chengzhong Xu, and Zhenan Sun. 2021. One shot face swapping on megapixels. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4834-4844.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Cheng, H., Chow, K. P., & Nie, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
Published
2023-05-30
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 1551-6857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6865
OpenAlex
W4361003656
Cited by
111
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 9
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfake detection, convolutional transformer, key frames, video compression artifacts, cross-dataset transferability, digital forensics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review