Cited by 22Topic ModelingMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Prompt-Eng: Healthcare Prompt Engineering: Revolutionizing Healthcare Applications with Precision Prompts

Ahmed, Awais, Hou, Mengshu, Xi, Rui, Zeng, Xiaoyang, Shah, Syed Attique·2024·Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024

Abstract

Prompt Engineering has emerged as a pivotal technique in Natural Language Processing, providing a flexible approach for leveraging pre-trained language models. Particularly, a prompt is used to instruct the model to adopt the nature of given prompts, which became a well-adoptable approach in wide areas of domains. Yet, existing prompt-guided frameworks are experiencing various challenges, such as crafting prompts for specific tasks to achieve clarity and conciseness and avoid ambiguity, which requires time and computational resources. Further existing methods heavily rely on the extensive labelled datasets, yet many domain-specific challenges exist, particularly in healthcare. This study presents Prompt-Eng, a novel framework emphasizing its wide-ranging applications in healthcare, where we design precise prompts with positive and negative aspects; we hypothesize that designing prompts in pairs helps models to generalize effectively. We delve into the significance of quick design and optimization, highlighting its influence in shaping model responses. In addition, we explore the increasing demand for prompts that are aware of the context in multimodal data analysis and the incorporation of prompt engineering in new machine-learning approaches. The essence of our approach is in creating tailored prompts, which serve as instructive guidelines for the models during the prediction procedure. The proposed methodology emphasizes utilizing context-aware prompt pairs to facilitate interpreting and extracting healthcare information from a health corpus by models. The study uses the medical MIMIC-III \footnotehttps://physionet.org/content/mimiciii/1.4/ corpus to predict medicine prescriptions. The paper also explores visual and textual prompts for X-ray image analysis for pneumonia prediction on the MIMIC-CXR \footnote\urlhttps://physionet.org/content/mimic-cxr/2.0.0/ dataset. This approach stands out from existing methods by addressing challenges such as clarity, conciseness, and context awareness, thereby enabling improved interpretation and extraction of healthcare information from diverse data sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3589335.3651904

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, A., Hou, M., Xi, R., Zeng, X., & Shah, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Birmingham City University (GB)
Venue
Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-13
Pages
1329-1337
OpenAlex
W4396844283
Cited by
22
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 2
FWCI
6.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
prompt engineering, MIMIC-III, MIMIC-CXR, pneumonia prediction, X-ray image analysis, multimodal prompts, clinical information extraction, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review