The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 176 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models
Open accessAbstract
Large generative AI models (LGAIMs), such as ChatGPT, GPT-4 or Stable Diffusion, are rapidly transforming the way we communicate, illustrate, and create. However, AI regulation, in the EU and beyond, has primarily focused on conventional AI models, not LGAIMs. This paper will situate these new generative models in the current debate on trustworthy AI regulation, and ask how the law can be tailored to their capabilities. After laying technical foundations, the legal part of the paper proceeds in four steps, covering (1) direct regulation, (2) data protection, (3) content moderation, and (4) policy proposals. It suggests a novel terminology to capture the AI value chain in LGAIM settings by differentiating between LGAIM developers, deployers, professional and non-professional users, as well as recipients of LGAIM output. We tailor regulatory duties to these different actors along the value chain and suggest strategies to ensure that LGAIMs are trustworthy and deployed for the benefit of society at large. Rules in the AI Act and other direct regulation must match the specificities of pre-trained models. The paper argues for three layers of obligations concerning LGAIMs (minimum standards for all LGAIMs; high-risk obligations for high-risk use cases; collaborations along the AI value chain). In general, regulation should focus on concrete high-risk applications, and not the pre-trained model itself, and should include (i) obligations regarding transparency and (ii) risk management. Non-discrimination provisions (iii) may, however, apply to LGAIM developers. Lastly, (iv) the core of the DSA's content moderation rules should be expanded to cover LGAIMs. This includes notice and action mechanisms, and trusted flaggers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example, improperly secured LLMs could enable bad actors to generate fake patient data or insurance claims [62].”
From Generative AI in medical practice: in-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges (2024) · cites this paper as [62]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 2×
“Transparent LGAIMs connected to (good-old) knowledge bases, such as AtMan [43], present a promising way forward in this direction.”
BackgroundBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 4×
“LGAIMs are usually trained with several billion, if not hundreds of billions, parameters [43, 44], requiring large amounts of training data and computing power [45].”
BackgroundInfluentialLearning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293 · cited 1×
“OpenAI’s “CLIP” image classifier, for example, was built using a set of 400 million image-text pairs [46].”
MethodLewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.13461 · Cited by 8,816 · cited 1×
“Although the emergence of these models in recent years constitutes a significant technical advance (for foundations, see [39-43]), they harness, to a reasonable extent, existing technologies in a vastly increased scale and scope.”
BackgroundLiu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3560815 · Cited by 4,361
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.13586 · Cited by 4,352
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C. L., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.02155 · Cited by 4,208
Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.00399 · Cited by 3,582
Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2011 · Cited by 3,117 · cited 1×
“2 LGAIMs can often digest human text input [57, 58] and produce an output (text; image; audio; video) based on it.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Marcus, G. A Skeptical Take on the A.I. Revolution. The Ezra Klein Show, The New York Times, 2023.
- Beuth, P. Wie sich ChatGPT mit Worten hacken lässt. Der Spiegel, 2023.
- Satariano, A. and Mozur, P. The People Onscreen Are Fake. The Disinformation Is Real., 2023.
- Edwards, L. Regulating AI in Europe: four problems and four solutions (2022), 2022.
- Hacker, P., Engel, A. and List, T. Understanding and regulating ChatGPT, and other large generative AI models. 2023.
- Heikkilä, M. The EU wants to regulate your favorite AI tools. 2023.
- Chee, F. Y. and Mukherjee, S. Exclusive: ChatGPT in spotlight as EU's Breton bats for tougher AI rules. Reuters, 2023.
- Smith, B. Meeting the AI moment: advancing the future through responsible AI. 2023.
- Lieu, T. I'm a Congressman Who Codes. A.I. Freaks Me Out., 2023.
- Douek, E. Content Moderation as Systems Thinking. Harv. L. Rev., 136 (2022), 526.
- 10.1007/978-3-030-95220-4_4 · DOI
- Meyer, P. ChatGPT: How Does It Work Internally? , 2022.
- Sassoli, M. Autonomous weapons and international humanitarian law: Advantages, open technical questions and legal issues to be clarified. International Law Studies, 90, 1 (2014), 1.
- Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T. and Sutskever, I. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training (2018).
- Bienert, J. and Klös, H.-P. Große KI-Modelle als Basis für Forschung und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung. IW-Kurzbericht, 2022.
- OECD Measuring the Environmental Impacts of AI Compute and Applications: The AI Footprint. 2022.
- ACM, T. P. C. ACM TechBrief: Computing and Climate Change. 2021.
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.018 · DOI
- Ananthaswamy, A. The Physics Principle That Inspired Modern AI Art. 2023.
- Luccioni, A. S. and Viviano, J. D. What's in the Box? A Preliminary Analysis of Undesirable Content in the Common Crawl Corpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.02732 (2021). · arXiv
- Perrigo, B. OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 Per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic. 2023.
- Bertuzzi, L. Leading MEPs exclude general-purpose AI from high-risk categories – for now. 2022.
- Bertuzzi, L. AI Act: EU Parliament's crunch time on high-risk categorisation, prohibited practices. 2023.
- Bertuzzi, L. AI Act: MEPs close in on rules for general purpose AI, foundation models. 2023.
- Bertuzzi, L. MEPs seal the deal on Artificial Intelligence Act. 2023.
- Liang, P., Bommasani, R., Creel, K. and Reich, R. The time is now to develop community norms for the release of foundation models. 2022.
- Bornstein, M., Appenzeller, G. and Casado, M. Who Owns the Generative AI Platform? , 2023.
- Micklitz, H.-W., Stuyck, J., Terryn, E. and School, I. C. Consumer law. Hart London, 2010.
- Meyers, J. M. Artificial intelligence and trade secrets. Landslide, 11 (2018), 17.
- Bertuzzi, L. Leading EU lawmakers propose obligations for General Purpose AI. 2023.
- Calvin, N. and Leung, J. Who owns artificial intelligence? A preliminary analysis of corporate intellectual property strategies and why they matter. Future of Humanity Institute, February (2020).
- Deeks, A. The judicial demand for explainable artificial intelligence. Columbia Law Review, 119, 7 (2019), 1829-1850.
- McKown, J. R. Discovery of Trade Secrets. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ, 10 (1994), 35.
- Subrin, S. N. Discovery in Global Perspective: Are We Nuts. DePaul L. Rev., 52 (2002), 299.
- Daniel, P. F. Protecting Trade Secrets from Discovery. Tort & Ins. LJ, 30 (1994), 1033.
- Wachter, S. Affinity profiling and discrimination by association in online behavioral advertising. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 35 (2020), 367.
- Kiela, D., Firooz, H., Mohan, A., Goswami, V., Singh, A., Fitzpatrick, C. A., Bull, P., Lipstein, G., Nelli, T. and Zhu, R. The hateful memes challenge: Competition report. PMLR, 2021.
- Seeha, S. Prompt Engineering and Zero-Shot/Few-Shot Learning [Guide]. 2022.
- European, C., Directorate-General for Communications Networks, C., Technology, Hoboken, J., Quintais, J., Poort, J. and Eijk, N. Hosting intermediary services and illegal content online : an analysis of the scope of article 14 ECD in light of developments in the online service landscape : final report. Publications Office, 2019.
- 10.1017/CBO9780511676161 · DOI
- Gerdemann, S. and Spindler, G. Das Gesetz über digitale Dienste (Digital Services Act) (Part 2). Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2023), 115-125.
- Bertuzzi, L. AI Act: MEPs want fundamental rights assessments, obligations for high-risk users. 2023.
- Crootof, R. Artificial intelligence research needs responsible publication norms. Lawfare Blog (2019).
- Hoffmann-Riem, W. Innovation und Recht-Recht und Innovation: Recht im Ensemble seiner Kontexte. Mohr Siebeck, 2016.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 493
Ananny, M. (2024) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2024.2319000 · Cited by 28
“For example, some researchers identify a regulatory stack, seeing public priorities like transparency, data protection, risk management, and non-discrimination as essential normative concerns (Hacker, Engel, and Mauer 2023).”
BackgroundChatGPT e outras IAs transformarão a pesquisa científica: reflexões sobre seus usos
Sampaio, R. C., Nicolás, M. A., Junquilho, T. A., Silva, L. R. L., de Freitas, C. S., Telles, M., Teixeira, J. S., da Escóssia, F. M., & dos Santos, L. C. (2024) · Revista de Sociologia e Política · doi:10.1590/1678-98732432e008 · Cited by 54
Inteligência artificial: promessas, riscos e regulação. Algo de novo debaixo do sol
Barroso, L. R., & Mello, P. P. C. (2024) · Revista Direito e Práxis · doi:10.1590/2179-8966/2024/84479 · Cited by 36
Madsen, D. Ø., & Toston, D. M. (2025) · Digital · doi:10.3390/digital5030024 · Cited by 16
“Third, there is a growing need for research on governance and regulation, including studies on how institutions and governments can design safe-guards, accountability mechanisms, and disclosure standards for ChatGPT in public-facing digital services [168].”
SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language ModelsPreprint
Ren, J., Xing, Y., Cui, Y., Aggarwal, C. C., & Liu, H. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.09227 · Cited by 27
“However, concerns have been increasingly raised about the inclusion of copyrighted, private, or sensitive information in the training data [5], [6].”
Basha, M., & Rodríguez-Pérez, G. (2025) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107804 · Cited by 15
Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Black-Box Vision-Language Models
Hu, K., Yu, W.-C., Zhang, L., Robey, A., Zou, A., Xu, C.-M., Hu, H.-Q., & Fredrikson, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.01050 · Cited by 14
“Given the tendency for foundation models to output the content they see during training (Nasr et al., 2023), both text-and image-based models are fine-tuned to refuse to respond to queries requesting objectionable responses Hacker et al. (2023); Ouyang et al. (2022).”
Alhusban, M. I., Khatatbeh, I. N., & Alshurafat, H. (2025) · Competitiveness Review An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness · doi:10.1108/cr-06-2024-0121 · Cited by 24
Navigating data governance risks: Facial recognition in law enforcement under EU legislation
Gültekin-Várkonyi, G. (2024) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2024.3.1798 · Cited by 14
ChatGPT: a reliable fertility decision-making tool?
Beilby, K., & Hammarberg, K. (2024) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dead272 · Cited by 14
“As such, the most accurate answers it will provide relate to the most dogmatic or consistent messaging used during the training process, which includes human moderation, albeit in a currently non-transparent way (Hacker et al. , 2023).”
BackgroundPerformance of ChatGPT on the National Korean Occupational Therapy Licensing Examination
Lee, S.-A., Heo, S., & Park, J. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241236635 · Cited by 12
“8,11,16 Therefore, future studies should investigate whether ChatGPT can also be used for educational purposes to support the process of writing explanations for occupational therapy-related questions.”
BackgroundChatGPT and computational-based research: benefits, drawbacks, and machine learning applications
Atkinson, C. F. (2023) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00091-3 · Cited by 18
“GenAI models are normally trained on several billion, sometimes hundreds of billions of different parameters, necessitating vast amounts of data and computing power [30].”
BackgroundCooperative AI via Decentralized Commitment DevicesPreprint
Sun, X.-Y., Crapis, D., Stephenson, M., Monnot, B., Thiery, T., & Passerat-Palmbach, J. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.07815 · Cited by 14
“…existing approaches to both coordination and safety problems presume critical use of traditional social technologies like policies and regulation [42] [86] [33], which are insufficient and too slow for coordinating games with a mixture of human and algorithmic participants, especially in…”
BackgroundZehlike, M., Loosley, A., Jonsson, H., Wiedemann, E., & Hacker, P. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.00469 · Cited by 14
“The same holds true for the AI Act, where the literature, so far, focuses almost exclusively on the legal, economic and policy issues [101, 74, 50, 55, 81, 92] or on explainability questions [83, 97].”
Self-citationAssessing the possibility of using large language models in ocular surface diseases.
Ling, Q., Xu, Z.-S., Zeng, Y.-M., Hong, Q., Qian, X.-Z., Hu, J.-Y., Pei, C.-G., Wei, H., Zou, J., Chen, C., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.18240/ijo.2025.01.01 · Cited by 13
“Hacker et al [48] argue that regulation should focus on specific high-risk applications, rather than on the pre-trained model itself, and should include transparency obligations, risk management, non-discrimination provisions, and content moderation rules.”
Al-Alami, S. (2024) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.1504.01 · Cited by 14
“Moreover, the texts ChatGPT generates may sometimes include inappropriate content, biased information, or misleading ideas (Borji, 2023; Hacker et al., 2023; Sallam, 2023).”
BackgroundEmerging Concepts of Artificial Intelligence in the Hotel Industry: A Conceptual Paper
Talukder, M., Kabir, F., Muhsina, K., & Das, I. R. (2023) · International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews · doi:10.55248/gengpi.4.923.92451 · Cited by 13
“AI-Powered Marketing in today's digital age, marketing must incorporate individualized and specific strategies (Hacker et al., 2023).”
BackgroundHacker, P., Cordes, J., & Rochon, J. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.04997 · Cited by 13
Self-citationGenerative AI, Work and Risks in Cultural and Creative IndustriesPreprint
Walkowiak, E., & Potts, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4830265 · Cited by 19
Attack via Overfitting: 10-shot Benign Fine-tuning to Jailbreak LLMsPreprint
Xie, Z., Song, X.-R., & Luo, J. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02833 · Cited by 12
“However, as the QA pairs used in the attack are explicitly harmful, such attacks are easily detected and blocked by moderation models [8, 9, 10, 11].”
Leveraging Generative AI for sustainable supply chain: adoption challenges and strategic insights
Maghroor, H. R., Madanchi, F., & O’Neal, T. (2025) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2025.2561967 · Cited by 16
Emerging Data Practices: Data Work in the Era of Large Language Models
Garcia, A. A., Candello, H. C. D. S. P., Badillo-Urquiola, K. A., & Wong-Villacrés, M. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714069 · Cited by 15
“The challenges that Gen AI models pose involve and affect not one but a series of human stakeholders, including those whose data is used for model training and those who moderate the data, develop the models, create systems using these models, and use the results of these systems [44, 89, 120, 147].”
InfluentialZhou, J., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15073886 · Cited by 17
Single-pass Detection of Jailbreaking Input in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Candogan, L. N., Wu, Y.-T., Abad-Rocamora, E., Chrysos, G. G., & Cevher, V. (2025) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.15435 · Cited by 12
“A flurry of research has already emerged on how to set up safety guardrails in such models by finetuning them to align with harmless human preferences (Bai et al., 2022b; Hacker et al., 2023; Ouyang et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2023).”
Karadeniz, S. (2025) · Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1541455 · Cited by 12
An Inquiry Into the Use of Generative AI and Its Implications in Education
Baek, E.-O., & Wilson, R. (2024) · International Journal of Adult Education and Technology · doi:10.4018/ijaet.349233 · Cited by 12
An Empirical Exploration of Trust Dynamics in LLM Supply Chains
Balayn, A., Yurrita, M., Rancourt, F., Casati, F., & Gadiraju, U. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.16310 · Cited by 12
“We focus on LLM supply chains due to their complexity [21] and timely relevance.”
BackgroundCity AI: a strategic framework for urban artificial intelligence application and development
Zhu, D., & Liu, H. (2025) · Urban Informatics · doi:10.1007/s44212-025-00077-9 · Cited by 19
“The collaborative emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) models has given rise to new AI paradigms, rapidly changing the way we communicate, learn, and create (Hacker, Engel, and Mauer 2023).”
Keeping an Eye on LLM Unlearning: The Hidden Risk and Remedy
Ren, J., Dai, Z.-W., Tang, X.-F., Xing, Y., Zeng, S.-L., Liu, H., Zeng, J.-Y., Peng, Q., Varshney, S., Wang, S.-H., et al. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.00359 · Cited by 11
“However, growing concerns have been raised about the potential misuse of undesirable data in training, such as copyrighted materials, privacy-sensitive information, or harmful content [5, 6].”
Peeping into the Future: Understanding and Combating Generative AI-Based Fake News
Kumar, S., Sai, S., Chamola, V., Gaur, A., Agarwal, C., Huang, K., & Hussain, A. (2025) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-025-10457-7 · Cited by 11
“However, these traditional methods may fall short as GAI content becomes advanced [205].”
On bullshit, large language models, and the need to curb your enthusiasm
Tigard, D. W. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00743-3 · Cited by 10
“13 For related discussion concerning regulatory recommendations, see, e.g. Frosio [16] and Hacker et al. [18].”
Moon, H., Chung, Y., & Randolph, A. W. (2025) · IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) · doi:10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1991 · Cited by 11
“This issue stems from the model’s training data, which may include biased or discriminatory language (Hacker et al., 2023).”
Akpan, I., Razavi, R., & Akpan, A. A. (2025) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2024.0128 · Cited by 11
“,71,73 Also, ChatGPT can be trained to generate extensive synthetic data for analysis.”
Uncertainty in Visual Generative AI
Combs, K., Moyer, A., & Bihl, T. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17040136 · Cited by 15
Emplying Large Language Models for Surgical Education: An In-depth Analysis of ChatGPT-4
Siu, A., Gibson, D., Mu, X., Seth, I., Siu, A. C. W., Dooreemeah, D., & Lee, A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.5812/jme-137753 · Cited by 11
Nguyen, B., Sonnenfeld, N. A., Finkelstein, L., Alonso, A., Gomez, C., Duruaku, F., & Jentsch, F. G. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192904 · Cited by 14
“Whereas NLP is a process in which these ML algorithms are applied to analyze and interpret human language (e.g., Lund & Wang, 2023), LLMs are a type of structure used for NLP and to output natural language text (Hacker et al., 2023).”
MethodWalter, Y. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00276-7 · Cited by 14
“Within just a short period of time, the global community was faced with the questions of how to best deal with such AI models and how to regulate them [41, 50, 96, 140].”
Deng, C., Duan, Y., Jin, X., Chang, H., Tian, Y.-J., Liu, H., Zou, H. P., Jin, Y.-Q., Xiao, Y., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.05392 · Cited by 11
“…discussions are also proposed around its practical compliance with LLMs. Hacker et al. argue that this direct regulation is unsatisfactory and could be further enhanced from 1) the definition of GPAIS, 2) the risk management of GPAIS, and 3) the adverse consequences for competi - tion [101].”
Ahmadpanah, S. H., Mirabi, M., Sobhanloo, S., Afsharfarnia, P., Fallah, D., & Bayati, M. (2025) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2025.104080 · Cited by 8
LookAhead Tuning: Safer Language Models via Partial Answer Previews
Liu, K.-W., Wang, M.-R., Luo, Y.-J., Yuan, L., Sun, M.-S., Liang, L., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., Hooi, B., & Deng, S.-M. (2025) · Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.19041 · Cited by 10
On the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Automating Categorization of Scientific TextsPreprint
Shahi, G. K., & Hummel, O. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.15745 · Cited by 2
“Instead, GAI focuses on creating new content by using the data it was trained on (Hacker et al., 2023; Murphy, 2022).”
AccessShare: Co-designing Data Access and Sharing with Blind People
Kamikubo, R., Zeraati, F. Z., Lee, K., & Kacorri, H. (2024) · International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) · doi:10.1145/3663548.3675612 · Cited by 8
Automatic Job Safety Report Generation using RAG-based LLMs
Bernardi, M. L., Cimitile, M., & Pecori, R. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn60899.2024.10651320 · Cited by 13
Mitigating the Risks of Generative AI in Government through Algorithmic Governance
Esposito, M., & Tse, T. (2024) · Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3657054.3657124 · Cited by 10
“Growing scholarly and industry attention has been given to recognizing and addressing their risks [4, 17, 28, 36].”
BackgroundRazi, A., Bouzoubaa, L., Pessianzadeh, A., Seberger, J. S., & Rezapour, R. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.00995 · Cited by 10
“Hacker et al. (2023) argue that regulation should prioritize transparency and risk management and broaden content moderation guidelines to include governance in Gen AI models.”
Generative AI: Evolution and its Future
Batchu, C., & Satya, V. V. (2024) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.12046 · Cited by 10
“[5] Associated Press and OpenAI partner to explore generative AI to license news stories.”
BackgroundThe regulation of fine-tuning: Federated compliance for modified general-purpose AI models
Hacker, P., & Holweg, M. (2025) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106234 · Cited by 10
Self-citationLarge Language Models Threaten Language’s Epistemic and Communicative Foundations
Srivastava, S. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1457 · Cited by 8
“This diffusion strains legal and academic norms (Hacker et al., 2023; Mittelstadt and Floridi, 2016; Kosseff, 2019).”
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Ethical Considerations and Assessment Checklist
Ning, Y., Teixayavong, S., Shang, Y., Savulescu, J., Nagaraj, V., Miao, D., Mertens, M., Ting, D. S. W., Ong, J. C. L., Liu, M., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.02107 · Cited by 9
“Unlike existing checklists (e.g., TRIPOD for prediction model development and its upcoming AI extension 45,46 or CLAIM for AI in medical imaging 47,48 ) that provide detailed guidance on key considerations and information to report in each section of a manuscript based on well-established best…”
MethodAutomatic Generation of Job Safety Reports with Explainable RAG-Based LLMs
Bernardi, M. L., Cimitile, M., Panella, G., Pecori, R., & Simoncelli, G. (2025) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-025-10634-x · Cited by 10
DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT Wordsmith
Kumari, K., Pegoraro, A., Fereidooni, H., & Sadeghi, A. (2023) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2024.231190 · Cited by 9
“Students are using it to generate assignments and coding projects [8], [12], scholars rely on it for producing academic papers [20], and malicious actors exploit it to spread fake news on social media platforms [24], [13].”
Odion, S., & Addula, S. R. (2026) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi18040209 · Cited by 8
Anthropomorphic technology in everyday life: focus on chatbots and impacts on mental health
Monteith, S., Glenn, T., Geddes, J. R., Whybrow, P. C., Achtyes, E. D., & Bauer, M. (2025) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-025-02088-8 · Cited by 9
“The challenges to prevent misuse of chatbots were not discussed [91, 92].”
Gao, L., Chen, O., Lee, R., Feamster, N., Tan, C.-H., & Chetty, M. (2025) · USENIX Security Symposium · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.14018 · Cited by 8
“More recent studies have recognized that regulating content generation in GAI products is an emerging issue worthy of attention [2, 32, 69].”
Digital Psychology: Introducing a Conceptual Impact Model and the Future of Work
Walter, Y. (2024) · Trends in Psychology · doi:10.1007/s43076-024-00408-w · Cited by 16
Global AI Governance in Healthcare: A Cross-Jurisdictional Regulatory Analysis
Chakraborty, A., & Karhade, M. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.08695 · Cited by 8
“Regulatory mechanisms for GenAI have been proposed advocating three layers of regulation: universal technology-neutral regulation, regulation on high-risk applications of GenAI rather than pre-trained models, and regulation on information access [Hacker et al., 2023].”
InfluentialBall, C., & Huang, K. (2023) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.884 · Cited by 8
“The recent widespread proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI), and especially Generative AI (GAI), is reshaping our world by redefining how we live, work, communicate, and create (Hacker, Engel, & Mauer, 2023).”
BackgroundGhosh, A., & Lakshmi, D. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.04448 · Cited by 8
“by AI providers [35] or by the middlemen using it in products [32] have been proposed so as to better assess context-specific harms of a general-purpose AI system.”
BackgroundLegal issues concerning Generative AI technologies
Ungureanu, C. T., & Amironesei, A.-E. (2024) · Eastern Journal of European Studies · doi:10.47743/ejes-2023-0203 · Cited by 8
“These techniques generally imply having in place both a pre-moderation (Hacker et al., 2023, p. 3) and a moderation procedure during which humans detect and remove any inappropriate or illegal content (input or output).”
BackgroundSocial participation as an ethical criterion for AI governance in public administration
De Carvalho, L. L., Buchbinder, F., Da Hora, D. A. B., Ferreira, V. B., & De Carvalho, D. M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01010-9 · Cited by 7
“…examines how power relations, the economy, culture, and knowledge are shaped by colonial legacies, and seeks to promote the decolonization of these structures [ 23]. framework but also offers tools to address the underrepre - sentation of Latin American perspectives in the literature on AI ethics.”
Addressing Autonomy Risks in Generative Chatbots with the Socratic Method
Lu, W., & Hu, Z. (2025) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-025-00567-8 · Cited by 8
“These frameworks are designed to facilitate the lawful and ethical use of generative AI, particularly concerning intellectual property rights, data security, and privacy protection (Hacker et al., 2023; Dixon, 2023).”
Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2025) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197565896.001.0001 · Cited by 10
Attitudes to the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Language Learning
Alsaawi, A., Almoaily, M., Almulhim, F., Alahmadi, N. S., & Alshenqeeti, H. (2025) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.376344 · Cited by 13
User perceptions and intentions to continue using generative AI tools in the design process
Kim, J., & Kim, H. (2025) · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55214/25768484.v9i4.5933 · Cited by 7
“Designers increasingly use tools like Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and DALL-E for creating posters, brand identities, and typography, while ChatGPT aids in drafting design descriptions and refining creative expression [4, 5].”
Understanding graphic designers’ usage behavior of generative artificial intelligence tools
Qiu, T., Yang, D., Zeng, H., & Chen, X. (2024) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-05-2024-1159 · Cited by 10
Large language models, politics, and the functionalization of language
Kudina, O., & de Boer, B. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00564-w · Cited by 11
Zhang, D.-W., Xia, B.-M., Liu, Y., Xu, X.-W., Hoàng, T., Xing, Z.-C., Staples, M., Lu, Q.-H., & Zhu, L.-M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.07915 · Cited by 7
“These models, while transformative in their capabilities to generate content based on patterns in existing data, bring to the fore pressing concerns about data privacy, copyright infringements, and the broader ethics of data usage [3].”
BackgroundTriguero, I., Molina, D., Poyatos, J., del Ser, J., & Herrera, F. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.14283 · Cited by 7
“This definition has been heavily criticised [26], as it is overly inclusive, so that, simple image or speech recognition systems would qualify as GPAIS.”
BackgroundBallell, T. R. D. L. H. (2025) · Cambridge Forum on AI Law and Governance · doi:10.1017/cfl.2024.8 · Cited by 5
Firth, D., Derendinger, M. L., & Triche, J. (2024) · Information Systems Education Journal · doi:10.62273/bzsu7160 · Cited by 10
Security and Privacy of Large Language Models: Threat Taxonomy, Ethical Implications, and Governance
Pribisalić, M., & Martinčić-Ipšić, S. (2026) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai7050152 · Cited by 9
Machine Learners Should Acknowledge the Legal Implications of Large Language Models as Personal DataPreprint
Nolte, H., Finck, M., & Meding, K. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01630 · Cited by 14
“The relationship between AI memorization and data protection law under the GDPR has garnered considerable attention [14, 33, 34, 82].”
Gao, R.-Z., & Wang, Y.-H. (2024) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2024.2434479 · Cited by 6
“Secondly, although a few studies have discussed the governance countermeasures of potential GAI risks, they are mostly from the perspective of a single stakeholder and lack a comprehensive consideration of the governance of the dynamic game among multi-stakeholders (Hacker, Engel, and Mauer 2023).”
From Cool Demos to Production-Ready FMware: Core Challenges and a Technology Roadmap
Rajbahadur, G. K., Oliva, G., Lin, D.-Y., Shin, J., & Hassan, A. E. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.20791 · Cited by 6
“FMs must align with the legal requirements of their deployment regions; for example, using ChatGPT-4-based FMware in China may not be viable due to local regulations [97, 98].”
Defending Against AI Threats with a User-Centric Trustworthiness Assessment Framework
Kafali, E., Preuveneers, D., Semertzidis, T., & Daras, P. (2024) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc8110142 · Cited by 6
A RAG-based Feedback Tool to Augment UML Class Diagram Learning
Ardimento, P., Bernardi, M. L., Cimitile, M., & Scalera, M. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS) · doi:10.1145/3652620.3687784 · Cited by 8
Khawaldeh, A. M. (2024) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-024-10199-z · Cited by 7
“The use of Generative AI thereby opens avenues for civil litigation [ 27 , 28 , 32 ].”
Harnessing the Power of Generative AI
Jonnala, A. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering · doi:10.14445/23488387/ijcse-v11i8p105 · Cited by 6
“The generator network learns to generate new data samples, such as images or text, while the discriminator network learns to distinguish between real and generated samples [7].”
Algorithmic governance and AI: balancing innovation and oversight in Indonesian policy analyst
Kusumasari, B., & Yahya, B. N. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02002-1 · Cited by 6
“Hacker et al. (2023) advocate technology-neutral regulations that are more appropriate for addressing emerging risks.”
Technology entrepreneurship is more than one might think
Swanson, E. (2024) · Information and organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100512 · Cited by 6
Sampaio, R. C., Chagas, V. H. C. D. S., Sanchez, C. S., Gonçalves, J., Borges, T., Alison, M. B., Tigrinho, C. S., de Souza, J. R., & Paz, F. S. (2024) · Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa · doi:10.33361/rpq.2024.v.12.n.30.729 · Cited by 19
Leveraging Explainable AI in Business and Further
DeSimone, H., & León, M. (2024) · IEEE Opportunity Research Scholars Symposium (ORSS) · doi:10.1109/orss62274.2024.10697961 · Cited by 9
“Additionally, Hacker (2023) highlights the transformative prospects as well as risks associated with large generative AI models (LGAIMs), such as ChatGPT, and how current regulations are not suited to manage this class of AI [41].”
BackgroundFaccia, A., Manni, F., Pandey, V., & Cavaliere, L. P. L. (2023) · International Conference on Information Science and Engineering · doi:10.1145/3641032.3641065 · Cited by 6
“Generative AI, another subset of AI, is centred around models that generate new data instances that resemble the training data [16].”
BackgroundPeople's Perceptions Toward Bias and Related Concepts in Large Language Models: A Systematic Review
Wang, L., Song, M., Rezapour, R., Kwon, B. C., & Huh, J. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.14504 · Cited by 23
“While LLMs are rapidly transforming the way people communicate, create, and work [26], significant advancements made by LLMs give rise to emerging ethical concerns like potential biases and fairness, reliability, and toxicity [88].”
BackgroundKhamsehashari, R., Schmitt, V., Polzehl, T., Mohtaj, S., & Möller, S. (2023) · Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication (SPSC) · doi:10.21437/spsc.2023-1 · Cited by 2
“…applicable functions such as image and speech recognition, audio and video generation, pattern detection, question answering, translation and others; a general purpose AI system may be used in a plurality of contexts and be integrated in a plurality of other AI systems” (Article 3(1b) AI Act) [53].”
InfluentialVoluminous yet Vacuous? Semantic Capital in an Age of Large Language Models
Nannini, L. (2023) · ETHAICS@IJCAI · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.01773 · Cited by 6
“For an in-depth overview of these legislative implications, also outstanding the EU ground, refer to the working paper of [64].”
BackgroundLevene, M., & Wooldridge, J. (2023) · doi:10.47120/npl.ms45 · Cited by 9
“We will now discuss a suggestion of how to regulate foundation models in the context of trustworthy AI, concentrating on ChatGPT as an operational LLM [55].”
MethodHernández, A. D., Perini, A., Hadjiloizou, S., Borda, A., Mahomed, S., & Leslie, D. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00902-6 · Cited by 12
Nana, V. K., & Marshall, M. T. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6110278 · Cited by 6
“A possible example is given by Hacker et al. [67], highlighting the malicious use of improperly secured LLMs to generate fake patients for insurance claims.”
Zhou, J., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13679-2 · Cited by 4
“The Artificial Intelligence Act needs to keep pace with the rapid advancements in AI technology (Hacker et al., 2023).”
Generative artificial intelligence policies: information governance
Wang, X., Liu, B., & Bao, L. (2025) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-06-2024-1422 · Cited by 7
Wang, Z., & Qi, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.12339 · Cited by 1
“The extraordinary capabilities of LLMs raise considerable concerns about their safety and responsibility (Floridi et al., 2021; Cath et al., 2018; Bommasani et al., 2021; Hacker et al., 2023).”
ChatGPT's Performance on Iran's Medical Licensing Exams
Keshtkar, A., Hayat, A. A., Atighi, F., Ayare, N., Keshtkar, M., Yazdanpanahi, P., Sadeghi, E., Deilami, N., Reihani, H., Karimi, A., et al. (2025) · Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · doi:10.47176/mjiri.39.24 · Cited by 9
“With the development of ChatGPT, a crucial turning point in the field of conversational AI has emerged, in which all aspects of society can be influenced, particularly the field of medicine, from research to teaching (16, 17).”
Generative Artificial Intelligence: Current Trends, Issues, and Challenges
Vyas, P., & Vyas, G. (2025) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2024.3516058 · Cited by 5
Codes of Conduct in the Digital Services Act
Griffin, R. (2024) · Technology and Regulation · doi:10.71265/a54szq76 · Cited by 14
“…than a year after the DSA was passed, commentators were already pointing out that it had not anticipated the rapidly increasing availability and popularity of generative AI, leaving concerning regulatory gaps and ambiguities, 80 while major platforms raced to implement tools with well-known risks.”
Certifying Generative AI: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Chatbots in High-Stakes Environments
Shan, R. (2024) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2024.3401085 · Cited by 11
“12 Despite these advancements, there remains a notable oversight: the specific challenges posed by RAG GenAI have not been adequately addressed by existing frameworks.”
BackgroundAnalyzing The Impact of Generative AI on IT Employee Performance
Rafi, M. S., Aitken, J. M., Fatah, T. D., & Mailangkay, A. B. L. (2024) · International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit62134.2024.10701171 · Cited by 9
“Similarly, [4] highlighted the critical role of discriminant validity in their study on regulating ChatGPT and other large generative AI models.”
BackgroundMethodResultDisinfecting AI: Mitigating Generative AI's Top Risks
Campbell, M., & Jovanović, M. (2024) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2024.3374433 · Cited by 5
Pandey, M., Litoriya, R., & Pandey, P. (2024) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-024-10917-7 · Cited by 9
Artificial intelligence governance in smart cities: A European regulatory perspective
Fabrègue, B. F. G. (2023) · Journal of Autonomous Intelligence · doi:10.32629/jai.v7i2.672 · Cited by 7
“Consequently, the argument over how to regulate generative AI systems is intensifying [86,87] .”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hacker, P., Engel, A., & Mauer, M.
- Affiliations
- European University Viadrina (DE)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Venue
- 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2023-06-12
- Pages
- 1112-1123
- OpenAlex
- W4380319827
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 176
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 65
- FWCI
- 1289.86
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Universität Hamburg
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, AI regulation, trustworthy AI, EU AI Act, AI value chain, high-risk AI systems, data protection, content moderation, Digital Services Act, transparency obligations, risk management, non-discrimination, pre-trained models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review