Cited by 145Software Engineering ResearchTopic ModelingSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

CoderEval: A Benchmark of Pragmatic Code Generation with Generative Pre-trained Models

Yu, Hao, Shen, Bo, Ran, Dezhi, Zhang, Jiaxin, Zhang, Qi, Ma, Yuchi, Liang, Guangtai, Li, Ying +2 more·2024·Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

Abstract

Code generation models based on the pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm have been increasingly attempted by both academia and industry, resulting in well-known industrial models such as Codex, CodeGen, and PanGu-Coder. To evaluate the effectiveness of these models, multiple existing benchmarks (e.g., HumanEval and AiXBench) are proposed, including only cases of generating a standalone function, i.e., a function that may invoke or access only built-in functions and standard libraries. However, non-standalone functions, which typically are not included in the existing benchmarks, constitute more than 70% of the functions in popular open-source projects, and evaluating models' effectiveness on standalone functions cannot reflect these models' effectiveness on pragmatic code generation scenarios (i.e., code generation for real settings of open source or proprietary code).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3597503.3623316

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, H., Shen, B., Ran, D., Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., Ma, Y., Liang, G., Li, Y., Wang, Q., & Xie, T.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-02-06
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0270-5257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391558462
Cited by
140
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 1
FWCI
52.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of China (No.62161146003)
  • National key research and development program Project (2021YFF0704202)
  • Tencent Foundation/XPLORER PRIZE
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
code generation benchmarks, HumanEval, codices, CodeGen, open-source code

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review