CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 896Work-Family Balance ChallengesPersonal Information Management and User BehaviorTechnostress in Professional Settings

Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Rott, Corinna, Fettah, Kiran, Pavlidis, Ioannis, Akleman, Ergun·2024
DOI 10.1145/3613904
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Few categories of people are thought to have gained more from remote work than parents of pre-adolescent children. We put this notion to the test by performing naturalistic monitoring for four days of a hybrid health professional with children and an onsite health professional with no children (control). The monitoring results, which are also visualized as comic strips, suggest that simultaneous performance of remote work and parenting tasks leads to increased stress and reduced productivity. These negative outcomes appear to be driven by the discordance between the parent’s work tasks and children’s activities at home. We theorize that the parent’s work tasks and children’s activities can become concordant in the mold of family farming practices of old, where children were incorporated into the parents’ activities in the field. In the context of modern white-collar work, such concordance can be achieved by designing imaginative extensions to the parent’s professional work software.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3613904

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical work shows varying levels of AI assistance can have U-shaped effects on quality and productivity, highlighting the need to personalize scaffolding to user needs.

    “Empirical work shows varying levels of AI assistance can have Ushaped effects on quality and productivity, highlighting the need to personalize scaffolding to user needs [15].”

    From How Do Human Creators Embrace Human-AI Co-Creation? A Perspective on Human Agency of Screenwriters (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

  • In the Creative context, support for planning takes the form of generative ideation, usually presented as suggestions, although some systems have a more equal and collaborative storytelling focus that weaves the AI ideas into the story text.

    “Support for planning takes the form of generative ideation, usually presented as suggestions [74,135], although some systems have a more equal and collaborative storytelling focus that weaves the AI ideas into the story text [70,92].”

    From Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing Process (2025) · cites this paper as [135]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rott, C., Fettah, K., Pavlidis, I., & Akleman, E.
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-11
DOI
10.1145/3613904
OpenAlex
W2769533150
Cited by
896
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 410 · 2024: 313 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
Keywords
remote work, parenting, work-family conflict, hybrid work, stress, productivity, comic strips, concordance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review