Cited by 18Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionMisinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and Politics

An Exploration of Decentralized Moderation on Mastodon

Open access
Bono, Carlo Alberto, La Cava, Lucio, Luceri, Luca, Pierri, Francesco·2024·ACM Web Science Conference

Abstract

Decentralized Online Social Networks (DOSNs) are rising as a valid alternative to traditional centralized platforms like X (Twitter) and Facebook. Mastodon is to date the most widely recognized decentralized social media service. Thousands of servers have been deployed in the last few years due to the availability of open-source software which allows anyone to easily join the network of interconnected servers. Nonetheless, akin to other social media, Mastodon encompasses instances that host harmful or inappropriate content, which demands moderation. However, the decentralized nature of Mastodon servers poses novel challenges for content moderation. In this work, we explore the dynamics of decentralized moderation on Mastodon through the main tool offered to servers’ administrators, namely blocklisting servers to prevent users of an instance from interacting with the content of these servers. Our goal is to shed light on the main traits that characterize blocklisted instances on Mastodon and investigate the emergence of common blocklisting patterns toward specific groups of instances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3614419.3644016

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work on decentralized social media has often focused on user behavior within individual implementations of protocols-particularly mastodon.social-and frequently treats decentralization as a given or as a purely technical property.

    “Prior work on decentralized social media has often focused on user behavior within individual implementations of protocols-particularly mastodon.social-andfrequently treats decentralization as a given [15,22], or as a purely technical property.”

    From Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Decentralizing power over infrastructure entails operating Clients, Servers, and Aggregators, imposing significant time, mental health, and financial costs on independent operators.

    “Finally, decentralizing power over infrastructure entails operating Clients, Servers, and Aggregators, imposing significant time, mental health, and financial costs on independent operators as noted in recent work [5,8,15,18,51].”

    From Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bono, C. A., La Cava, L., Luceri, L., & Pierri, F.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • DIMES, University of Calabria, Italy
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
ACM Web Science Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2024-05-21
Pages
53-58
OpenAlex
W4394902793
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
Mastodon, decentralized social networks, content moderation, harmful content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review