Cited by 50Complex Network Analysis TechniquesOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceSocial Media and Politics

Drivers of social influence in the Twitter migration to Mastodon

Open access
Cava, Lucio La, Aiello, Luca Maria, Tagarelli, Andrea·2023·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The migration of Twitter users to Mastodon following Elon Musk’s acquisition presents a unique opportunity to study collective behavior and gain insights into the drivers of coordinated behavior in online media. We analyzed the social network and the public conversations of about 75,000 migrated users and observed that the temporal trace of their migrations is compatible with a phenomenon of social influence, as described by a compartmental epidemic model of information diffusion. Drawing from prior research on behavioral change, we delved into the factors that account for variations of the effectiveness of the influence process across different Twitter communities. Communities in which the influence process unfolded more rapidly exhibit lower density of social connections, higher levels of signaled commitment to migrating, and more emphasis on shared identity and exchange of factual knowledge in the community discussion. These factors account collectively for 57% of the variance in the observed data. Our results highlight the joint importance of network structure, commitment, and psycho-linguistic aspects of social interactions in characterizing grassroots collective action, and contribute to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms that drive processes of behavior change of online groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-023-48200-7

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An alternative, decentralized paradigm for social media has emerged, primarily centered around protocols that seek to reconfigure how power is distributed across a network of actors.

    “In response, an alternative, decentralized paradigm for social media has emerged, primarily centered around protocols that seek to reconfigure how power is distributed across a network of actors [22,58,85].”

    From Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes the growth of decentralized social networks and says Mastodon lets communities independently manage servers connected through a common protocol. This supports the emergence of a decentralized alternative, but the paper does not characterize the broader paradigm as primarily centered on protocols designed to redistribute power across actors. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior work on decentralized social media has often focused on user behavior within individual implementations of protocols-particularly mastodon.social-and frequently treats decentralization as a given or as a purely technical property.

    “Prior work on decentralized social media has often focused on user behavior within individual implementations of protocols-particularly mastodon.social-andfrequently treats decentralization as a given [15,22], or as a purely technical property.”

    From Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction describes Mastodon as a decentralized alternative to Twitter, treating its decentralization as a platform characteristic. But the Introduction and Discussion describe this paper as a study of migration across Mastodon instances, not user behavior within mastodon.social in particular. They also do not establish the broader claim about what prior work has often focused on. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Habermas, J. On the Pragmat. Commun. (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cava, L. L., Aiello, L. M., & Tagarelli, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Calabria (IT)
  • IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Cava, Lucio La
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2023-12-07
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
21626-21626
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378945402
Cited by
48
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Carlsbergfondet (CF21-0432)
  • PNRR FAIR (H23C22000860006, M4C21.3 spoke 9)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
Mastodon, social influence, collective behavior, coordinated behavior, information dissemination, compartmental epidemic model, network structure, social network density, online communities, identity, behavior change
MeSH terms
Animals, Communication, Humans, Mastodons, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review