The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A requires/provides model for computer attacks
Abstract
Abstract – Computer attacks are typically described in terms of a single exploited vulnerability or as a signature composed of a specific sequence of events. These approaches lack the ability to characterize complex scenarios or to generalize to unknown attacks. Rather than think of attacks as a series of events, we view attacks as a set of capabilities that provide support for abstract attack concepts that in turn provide new capabilities to support other concepts. This paper describes a flexible extensible model for computer attacks, a language for specifying the model, and how it can be used in security applications such as vulnerability analysis, intrusion detection and attack generation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Sense of Self for Unix Processes
Forrest, S., Hofmeyr, S. A., Somayaji, A. B., & Longstaff, T. A. (1996) · Cited by 1,150
Ko, C., Ruschitzka, M., & Levitt, K. (2002) · Proceedings. 1997 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.97CB36097) · doi:10.1109/secpri.1997.601332 · Cited by 318
Self-citationPractical UNIX and Internet Security
Garfinkel, S., & Spafford, E. H. (1996) · Cited by 282
Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference
(2018) · doi:10.1145/3274694 · Cited by 200
The COPS Security Checker System
Farmer, D., & Spafford, E. H. (1990) · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · Cited by 144
Network security via reverse engineering of TCP code: vulnerability analysis and proposed solutions
Guha, B., & Mukherjee, B. (1997) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/65.598458 · Cited by 38
Cited by
Automated generation and analysis of attack graphs
Sheyner, O., Haines, J., Jha, S., Lippmann, R., & Wing, J. M. (2005) · Proceedings 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/secpri.2002.1004377 · Cited by 1,293
Scalable, graph-based network vulnerability analysis
Ammann, P., Wijesekera, D., & Kaushik, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/586110.586140 · Cited by 697
Practical Attack Graph Generation for Network Defense
Ingols, K., Lippmann, R., & Piwowarski, K. (2006) · 2006 22nd Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC'06) · doi:10.1109/acsac.2006.39 · Cited by 379
A survey of coordinated attacks and collaborative intrusion detection
Zhou, C. V., Leckie, C., & Karunasekera, S. (2010) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2009.06.008 · Cited by 374
Techniques and tools for analyzing intrusion alerts
Ning, P., Cui, Y., Reeves, D. S., & Xu, D. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/996943.996947 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Templeton, S. J., & Levitt, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2000 workshop on New security paradigms
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-02-20
- Pages
- 31-38
- OpenAlex
- W2068789742
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A requires/provides model for computer attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/366173.366187
- The paper
- Templeton, S. J., & Levitt, K. (2001). A requires/provides model for computer attacks. Proceedings of the 2000 workshop on New security paradigms. https://doi.org/10.1145/366173.366187
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
