The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference
Abstract
In March 1985, a group of computer professionals gathered in McLean, Virginia, to discuss issues regarding the application of computer security technologies to aerospace programs. That first conference, a one-day affair, featured nine papers in two tracks, attracted about 115 people, and was acclaimed a success. The Applied Computer Security Associates (ACSA) formed to continue the meeting on a regular basis, and three decades and roughly 1700 technical presentations later, the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC) continues to fulfill its core mission to discuss issues related to the practical application of computer security technology. Welcome to the thirtieth meeting of ACSAC! This year's meeting continues the strategic focus on cyberphysical system security began last year with even more peer-reviewed papers and expert panels. We also continue our discussion about the practical integration of security engineering with system engineering and building trustworthy, resilient systems. ACSAC 30 presents the latest in cybersecurity research, hosts workshops in layered assurance, malware memory forensics, and program protection and reverse engineering, and provides training in the latest technologies and security standards. As a special feature, ACSAC will celebrate the golden anniversary of the Multics project with a distinguished panel of Multicians who will discuss Multics' influence on information security and examine how the world has---and has not---embraced Multics' core security principles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models
Chen, B., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260 · Cited by 490
Security and Privacy Challenges of Large Language Models: A Survey
Das, B. C., Amini, M. H., & Wu, Y. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3712001 · Cited by 445
A requires/provides model for computer attacks
Templeton, S. J., & Levitt, K. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2000 workshop on New security paradigms · doi:10.1145/366173.366187 · Cited by 373
Emerging Trends in Blockchain Technology and Applications: A Review and Outlook
Gad, A. G., Mosa, D. T., Abualigah, L., & Abohany, A. A. (2022) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.03.007 · Cited by 283
A survey of Deep Neural Network watermarking techniques
Li, Y., Wang, H., & Barni, M. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.07.051 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-12-03
- OpenAlex
- W2911518933
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3274694
- The paper
- Proceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274694
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.