Cited by 8Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsEthics and Social Impacts of AICybernetics and Technology in Society

Between the booms: AI in Winter

Haigh, Thomas·2024·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

After people stopped caring, artificial intelligence got more interesting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3688379

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haigh, T.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Haigh, Thomas
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2024-10-25
Volume
67
Issue
11
Pages
18-23
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W4403210291
Cited by
8
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (262513311 - SFB 1187)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
artificial intelligence, AI research funding, research funding decline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review