CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTactile and Sensory Interactions

Light My Way: Developing and Exploring a Multimodal Interface to Assist People With Visual Impairments to Exit Highly Automated Vehicles

Open access
Meinhardt, Luca-Maxim, Weilke, Lina Madlin, Elhaidary, Maryam, von Abel, Julia, Fink, Paul D. S., Rietzler, Michael, Colley, Mark, Rukzio, Enrico·2025·Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DOI 10.1145/3706598.3713454
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The introduction of Highly Automated Vehicles (HAVs) has the potential to increase the independence of blind and visually impaired people (BVIPs). However, ensuring safety and situation awareness when exiting these vehicles in unfamiliar environments remains challenging. To address this, we conducted an interactive workshop with N=5 BVIPs to identify their information needs when exiting an HAV and evaluated three prior-developed low-fidelity prototypes. The insights from this workshop guided the development of PathFinder, a multimodal interface combining visual, auditory, and tactile modalities tailored to BVIP's unique needs. In a three-factorial within-between-subject study with N=16 BVIPs, we evaluated PathFinder against an auditory-only baseline in urban and rural scenarios. PathFinder significantly reduced mental demand and maintained high perceived safety in both scenarios, while the auditory baseline led to lower perceived safety in the urban scenario compared to the rural one. Qualitative feedback further supported PathFinder's effectiveness in providing spatial orientation during exiting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3706598.3713454

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. [1][1] Carl Halladay Abraham, Bert Boadi-Kusi, Enyam Komla Amewuho Morny, and Prince Agyekum. 2022. Smartphone usage among people living with severe visual impairment and blindness. Assistive Technology 34, 5 (Sept. 2022), 611–618. doi:10.1080/10400435.2021.1907485 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2][2] Peter Ackland, Serge Resnikoff, and Rupert Bourne. 2017. World blindness and vi- sual impairment: despite many successes, the problem is growing. Community eye health 30, 100 (2017), 71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5820628/
  3. [4][4] Jérémy Albouys-Perrois, Jérémy Laviole, Carine Briant, and Anke M. Brock. 2018. Towards aMultisensory Augmented RealityMap for Blind and LowVision People: a Participatory Design Approach. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–14. doi:10.1145/3173574.3174203 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [6][6] Amir Amedi, Lotfi B. Merabet, Felix Bermpohl, and Alvaro Pascual-Leone. 2005. The Occipital Cortex in the Blind: Lessons About Plasticity and Vision. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14, 6 (Dec. 2005), 306–311. doi:10.1111/j.0963- 7214.2005.00387.x · DOI
  5. [7][7] Aries Arditi and YingLi Tian. 2013. User interface preferences in the design of a camera-based navigation and wayfinding aid. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 107, 2 (2013), 118–129. doi:10.1177/0145482X1310700205 · DOI
  6. [10][10] Roger Bennett, Rohini Vijaygopal, and Rita Kottasz. 2020. Willingness of peo- ple who are blind to accept autonomous vehicles: An empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 69 (2020), 13–27. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.012 · DOI
  7. [11][11] Rupert R. A. Bourne, Jaimie Adelson, Seth Flaxman, Paul Briant, Michele Bottone, Theo Vos, Kovin Naidoo, Tasanee Braithwaite, Maria Cicinelli, Jost Jonas, Hans Limburg, Serge Resnikoff, Alex Silvester, Vinay Nangia, and Hugh R. Taylor. 2020. Global Prevalence of Blindness and Distance and Near Vision Impairment in 2020: progress towards the Vision 2020 targets and what the future holds. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 61, 7 (2020), 2317. doi:10.1016/S2214- 109X(20)30425-3 · DOI
  8. [12][12] Nicholas A. Bradley and Mark D. Dunlop. 2005. An Experimental Investigation into Wayfinding Directions for Visually Impaired People. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 9, 6 (Nov. 2005), 395–403. doi:10.1007/s00779-005-0350-y · DOI
  9. [14][14] Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, 3 (2021), 328–352. doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [16][16] Robin N. Brewer and Vaishnav Kameswaran. 2018. Understanding the Power of Control in Autonomous Vehicles for People with Vision Impairment. In Pro- ceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway, Ireland) (ASSETS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–197. doi:10.1145/3234695.3236347 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [17][17] Julian Brinkley, Earl W. Huff, Briana Posadas, Julia Woodward, Shaundra B. Daily, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2020. Exploring the Needs, Preferences, and Concerns of Persons with Visual Impairments Regarding Autonomous Vehicles. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 13, 1 (2020), 1–34. doi:10.1145/3372280 · DOI
  12. [18][18] Julian Brinkley, Brianna Posadas, Imani Sherman, Shaundra B. Daily, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2019. An Open Road Evaluation of a Self-Driving Vehicle Human– Machine Interface Designed for Visually Impaired Users. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 35, 11 (2019), 1018–1032. doi:10.1080/10447318. 2018.1561787 · DOI
  13. [19][19] Julian Brinkley, Brianna Posadas, JuliaWoodward, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2017. Opin- ions and Preferences of Blind and Low Vision Consumers Regarding Self-Driving Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Amy Hurst, Leah Findlater, and Meredith Ringel Morris (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 290–299. doi:10.1145/3132525.3132532 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [20][20] Piyush Chanana, Rohan Paul, M. Balakrishnan, and Pvm Rao. 2017. Assistive tech- nology solutions for aiding travel of pedestrians with visual impairment. Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering 4 (2017), 2055668317725993. https://github.com/luca-maxim/light_my_way https://www.uni-ulm.de/en/einrichtungen/scientific-workshop/ https://www.uni-ulm.de/en/einrichtungen/scientific-workshop/ https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1907485 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc5820628/ https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/templates/systems/urban-traffic-system-89133 https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/templates/systems/urban-traffic-system-89133 https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174203 https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/3d/vegetation/nature-package-forest-environment-165645 https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/3d/vegetation/nature-package-forest-environment-165645 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00387.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00387.x https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1310700205 https://www.arduino.cc/ https://www.bemyeyes.com/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.012 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0350-y https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706 qp063oa https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706 qp063oa https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/56391 https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/56391 https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236347 https://doi.org/10.1145/3372280 https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561787 https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561787 https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132532 CHI '25, April 26-May 1, 2025, Yokohama, Japan Meinhardt et al. doi:10.1177/2055668317725993 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [21][21] Francesco Chiossi, Steeven Villa, Melanie Hauser, Robin Welsch, and Lewis Chuang. 2022. Design of On-body Tactile Displays to Enhance Situation Aware- ness in Automated Vehicles. In 2022 IEEE 9th International Conference on Compu- tational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Appli- cations (CIVEMSA). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. doi:10.1109/CIVEMSA53371. 2022.9853690 · DOI
  16. [22][22] Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203771587 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [23][23] Mark Colley, Benjamin Eder, Jan Ole Rixen, and Enrico Rukzio. 2021. Effects of Semantic Segmentation Visualization on Trust, Situation Awareness, and Cognitive Load in Highly Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Aaron Quigley, Katherine Isbister, Takeo Igarashi, Pernille Bjørn, and Steven Drucker (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. doi:10.1145/3411764.3445351 · DOI
  18. [24][24] Patrizia Di Campli San Vito, Gözel Shakeri, Stephen Brewster, Frank Pollick, Edward Brown, Lee Skrypchuk, and Alexandros Mouzakitis. 2019. Haptic Nav- igation Cues on the Steering Wheel. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Stephen Brewster, Geraldine Fitz- patrick, Anna Cox, and Vassilis Kostakos (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300440 · DOI
  19. [25][25] Julie Ducasse, Anke M. Brock, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2018. Accessible Interac- tive Maps for Visually Impaired Users. In Mobility of Visually Impaired People, Edwige Pissaloux and Ramiro Velazquez (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 537–584. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54446-5_17 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [26][26] Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37, 1 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543. · DOI · Paper page
  21. [27][27] Mica R Endsley, Stephen J Selcon, Thomas D Hardiman, and Darryl G Croft. 1998. A comparative analysis of SAGAT and SART for evaluations of situation awareness. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 42. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 82–86.
  22. [28][28] Mica R. Endsley, Stephen J. Selcon, Thomas D. Hardiman, and Darryl G. Croft. 1998. A Comparative Analysis of Sagat and Sart for Evaluations of Situation Awareness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 42, 1 (1998), 82–86. doi:10.1177/154193129804200119 · DOI
  23. [29][29] Stefanie M. Faas, Andrea C. Kao, and Martin Baumann. 2020. A Longitudinal Video Study on Communicating Status and Intent for Self-Driving Vehicle – Pedestrian Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. doi:10.1145/3313831.3376484 · DOI
  24. [30][30] Paul D.S. Fink, Maher Alsamsam, Justin R. Brown, Henry D. Kindler, and Nicholas A. Giudice. 2023. Give us something to chauffeur it: Exploring user needs in traditional and fully autonomous ridesharing for people who are blind or visually impaired. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 98 (2023), 91–103. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2023.09.004 · DOI
  25. [31][31] Paul D.S. Fink, Stacy A. Doore, Xue (Shelley) Lin, Matthew Maring, Pu Zhao, Aubree Nygaard, Grant Beals, Richard R. Corey, Raymond J. Perry, Katherine Freund, Velin Dimitrov, and Nicholas A. Giudice. 2023. The Autonomous Vehicle Assistant (AVA): Emerging Technology Design Supporting Blind and Visually Impaired Travelers in Autonomous Transportation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2023), 103125. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103125 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [32][32] Paul D. S. Fink. 2023. Accessible Autonomy: Exploring Inclusive Autonomous Vehicle Design and Interaction for People Who Are Blind and Visually Impaired. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Maine. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ etd/3817
  27. [33][33] Paul D. S. Fink, Anas Abou Allaban, Omoruyi E. Atekha, Raymond J. Perry, Emily S. Sumner, Richard R. Corey, Velin Dimitrov, and Nicholas A. Giudice. 2023. Expanded Situational Awareness Without Vision. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Ginevra Castellano, Laurel Riek, Maya Cakmak, and Iolanda Leite (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 54–62. doi:10.1145/3568162.3576975 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [34][34] Paul D. S. Fink, Anas Abou Allaban, Omoruyi E. Atekha, Raymond J. Perry, Emily S. Sumner, Richard R. Corey, Velin Dimitrov, and Nicholas A. Giudice. 2023. Expanded Situational Awareness Without Vision: A Novel Haptic Interface for Use in Fully Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, Stockholm Sweden, 54–62. doi:10.1145/3568162.3576975 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [35][35] Paul D. S. Fink, Velin Dimitrov, Hiroshi Yasuda, Tiffany L. Chen, Richard R. Corey, Nicholas A. Giudice, and Emily S. Sumner. 2023. Autonomous is Not Enough: Designing Multisensory Mid-Air Gestures for Vehicle Interactions Among People with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 74, 13 pages. doi:10.1145/ 3544548.3580762
  30. [40][40] Nicholas A Giudice and Gordon E Legge. 2008. Blind navigation and the role of technology. The engineering handbook of smart technology for aging, disability, and independence (2008), 479–500. doi:10.1002/9780470379424.ch25 · DOI
  31. [41][41] Christiane Glatz, Stas S. Krupenia, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, and Lewis L. Chuang. 2018. Use the Right Sound for the Right Job: Verbal Commands and Auditory Icons for a Task-Management System Favor Different Information Processes in the Brain. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. doi:10.1145/3173574.3174046 · DOI
  32. [43][43] Anhong Guo, Saige McVea, Xu Wang, Patrick Clary, Ken Goldman, Yang Li, Yu Zhong, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2018. Investigating Cursor-based Interactions to Support Non-Visual Exploration in the Real World. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Galway Ireland, 3–14. doi:10.1145/3234695.3236339 · DOI
  33. [44][44] Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychol- ogy. Vol. 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 139–183. doi:10.1016/S0166- 4115(08)62386-9 · DOI
  34. [45][45] Kevin Anthony Hoff and Masooda Bashir. 2015. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human factors 57, 3 (2015), 407–434. doi:10.1177/0018720814547570 · DOI · Paper page
  35. [46][46] Leona Holloway, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Matthew Butler, Madhuka Thisuri De Silva, Kirsten Ellis, Cagatay Goncu, Kate Stephens, and Kim Marriott. 2022. Animations at Your Fingertips: Using a Refreshable Tactile Display to Convey Motion Graphics for People who are Blind or have Low Vision. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Athens Greece, 1–16. doi:10.1145/3517428.3544797 · DOI
  36. [47][47] Leona Holloway, Kim Marriott, and Matthew Butler. 2018. Accessible Maps for the Blind: Comparing 3D Printed Models with Tactile Graphics. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–13. doi:10.1145/3173574.3173772 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [48][48] Leona Holloway, Kim Marriott, Matthew Butler, and Samuel Reinders. 2019. 3D Printed Maps and Icons for Inclusion. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Shiri Azenkot, and Shaun K. Kane (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183–195. doi:10.1145/3308561. 3353790 · DOI
  38. [49][49] Mihail Ivanchev, Francis Zinke, and Ulrike Lucke. 2014. Pre-journey Visualization of Travel Routes for the Blind on Refreshable Interactive Tactile Displays. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Klaus Miesenberger, Deborah Fels, Dominique Archambault, Petr Peňáz, and Wolfgang Zagler (Eds.). Vol. 8548. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 81–88. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08599- 9_13 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. · DOI
  39. [50][50] M Jaspers, T Steen, C Bos, and M Geenen. 2004. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. International Journal of Medical Informatics 73, 11-12 (Nov. 2004), 781–795. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  40. [51][51] PatrickW. Jordan, Ian Lyall McClelland, B. Thomas, and Bernard A.Weerdmeester (Eds.). 1996. Usability evaluation in industry (first edition ed.). CRC Press, an imprint of Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL. https://permalink.obvsg.at/
  41. [52][52] Celina Kacperski, Florian Kutzner, and Tobias Vogel. 2024. Comparing au- tonomous vehicle acceptance of German residents with and without visual impairments. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology (2024), 1–11. doi:10.1080/17483107.2024.2317930 · DOI
  42. [53][53] Oswald Kothgassner, A Felnhofer, N Hauk, E Kastenhofer, J Gomm, and I Krysprin-Exner. 2013. Technology Usage Inventory. https: //www.ffg.at/sites/default/files/allgemeine_downloads/thematische% 20programme/programmdokumente/tui_manual.pdf. Manual. Wien: ICARUS 17, 04 (2013), 90. [Online; accessed: 05-JULY-2024].
  43. [54][54] Bineeth Kuriakose, Raju Shrestha, and Frode Eika Sandnes. 2022. Tools and Technologies for Blind and Visually Impaired Navigation Support: A Review. IETE Technical Review 39, 1 (Jan. 2022), 3–18. doi:10.1080/02564602.2020.1819893 · DOI
  44. [56][56] So Yeon Lee, B Gurnani, and Fassil B Mesfin. 2024. Blindness. https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448182/ Updated 2024 Feb 27. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan..
  45. [57][57] Bing Li, Juan Pablo Munoz, Xuejian Rong, Qingtian Chen, Jizhong Xiao, Yingli Tian, Aries Arditi, and Mohammed Yousuf. 2019. Vision-Based Mobile Indoor Assistive Navigation Aid for Blind People. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 18, 3 (March 2019), 702–714. doi:10.1109/TMC.2018.2842751 · DOI
  46. [58][58] Jack M. Loomis, Roberta L. Klatzky, and Nicholas A. Giudice. 2013. Representing 3D Space in Working Memory: Spatial Images from Vision, Hearing, Touch, and Language. In Multisensory Imagery, Simon Lacey and Rebecca Lawson (Eds.). Springer New York, New York, NY, 131–155. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5879-1_8 · DOI · Paper page
  47. [59][59] Jack M. Loomis, Yvonne Lippa, Roberta L. Klatzky, and Reginald G. Golledge. 2002. Spatial updating of locations specified by 3-D sound and spatial language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28, 2 (March 2002), 335–345. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.335 · DOI
  48. [60][60] Nidzamuddin Md. Yusof, J. Karjanto, J. M. B. Terken, F. L. M. Delbressine, and G. W. M. Rauterberg. 2020. Gaining Situation Awareness through a Vibrotactile Display to Mitigate Motion Sickness in Fully-Automated Driving Cars. Interna- tional Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 17, 1 (2020), 7771–7783. doi:10.15282/ijame.17.1.2020.23.0578 · DOI
  49. [61][61] Luca-Maxim Meinhardt, Maximilian Rück, Julian Zähnle, Maryam Elhaidary, Mark Colley, Michael Rietzler, and Enrico Rukzio. 2024. Hey, What's Going On? Conveying Traffic Information to People with Visual Impairments in Highly Automated Vehicles: Introducing OnBoard. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 8, 2, Article 67, 24 pages. doi:10.1145/3659618 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [62][62] Valerie Mendoza and David G. Novick. 2005. Usability over time. In Proceed- ings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: Documenting & Designing for Pervasive Information (Coventry, United King- dom) (SIGDOC '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 151–158. doi:10.1145/1085313.1085348 · DOI
  51. [64][64] Joy Ming, Sharon Heung, Shiri Azenkot, and Aditya Vashistha. 2021. Accept or Address? Researchers' Perspectives on Response Bias in Accessibility Research. In Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, Virtual Event USA, 1–13. doi:10.1145/3441852.3471216 · DOI
  52. [65][65] Michael J. Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory Design. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (jun 1993), 24–28. doi:10.1145/153571.255960 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [66][66] Chihab Nadri, Sangjin Ko, Colin Diggs, Michael Winters, V. K. Sreehari, and Myounghoon Jeon. 2021. Novel Auditory Displays in Highly Automated Vehicles: Sonification Improves Driver Situation Awareness, Perceived Workload, and Overall Experience. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 65, 1 (2021), 586–590. doi:10.1177/1071181321651071 · DOI
  54. [68][68] Oliver Nowak, René Schäfer, Anke Brocker, Philipp Wacker, and Jan Borchers. 2022. Shaping Textile Sliders: An Evaluation of Form Factors and Tick Marks for Textile Sliders. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 214, 14 pages. doi:10.1145/3491102.3517473 · DOI
  55. [71][71] Hari P. Palani, Paul D. S. Fink, and Nicholas A. Giudice. 2020. Design Guidelines for Schematizing and Rendering Haptically Perceivable Graphical Elements on Touchscreen Devices. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36, 15 (Sept. 2020), 1393–1414. doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1752464 · DOI · Paper page
  56. [73][73] Bastian Pfleging, Shadan Sadeghian, and Debargha Dey. 2021. User interfaces for automated vehicles. it - Information Technology 63, 2 (2021), 73–75. doi:10.1515/ itit-2021-0020
  57. [74][74] Parivash Ranjbar, Pournami Krishnan Krishnakumari, Jonas Andersson, and Maria Klingegård. 2022. Vibrotactile guidance for trips with autonomous vehicles for persons with blindness, deafblindness, and deafness. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 15 (2022), 100630. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100630 · DOI
  58. [76][76] René Schäfer, Oliver Nowak, Lovis Bero Suchmann, Sören Schröder, and Jan Borchers. 2023. What's That Shape? Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition of Textile Icons. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 580, 12 pages. doi:10.1145/3544548.3580920 · DOI
  59. [77][77] Ava Elizabeth Scott, Leon Reicherts, and Evropi Stefanidi. 2024. Doing CHI together: The benefits of a writing retreat for early-career HCI researchers. Interactions 31, 3 (2024), 8–9.
  60. [78][78] S. S. Shapiro and M. B. Wilk. 1965. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples). Biometrika 52, 3/4 (1965), 591–611. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2333709
  61. [79][79] Kohei Sonoda and Takahiro Wada. 2017. Displaying System Situation Awareness Increases Driver Trust in Automated Driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 2, 3 (2017), 185–193. doi:10.1109/TIV.2017.2749178 · DOI
  62. [80][80] R.M. Taylor. 2017. Situational Awareness Rating Technique (Sart): The Devel- opment of a Tool for Aircrew Systems Design. In Situational Awareness (1 ed.), Eduardo Salas (Ed.). Routledge, 111–128. doi:10.4324/9781315087924-8 · DOI
  63. [81][81] Jean Toner. 2009. Small is not too small: Reflections concerning the validity of very small focus groups (VSFGs). Qualitative Social Work 8, 2 (2009), 179–192. doi:10.1177/1473325009103374 · DOI
  64. [82][82] Endel Tulving and Neal Kroll. 1995. Novelty assessment in the brain and long- term memory encoding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2, 3 (1995), 387–390. doi:10.3758/BF03210977 · DOI
  65. [85][85] Christopher D. Wickens, Diane L. Sandry, and Michael Vidulich. 1983. Compati- bility and Resource Competition between Modalities of Input, Central Processing, and Output. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 25, 2 (April 1983), 227–248. doi:10.1177/001872088302500209 · DOI
  66. [86][86] Jacob O. Wobbrock, Leah Findlater, Darren Gergle, and James J. Higgins. 2011. The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 143–146. doi:10.1145/1978942. 1978963 · DOI
  67. [87][87] Jacob O. Wobbrock and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Research Contributions in Human- Computer Interaction. Interactions 23, 3 (apr 2016), 38–44. doi:10.1145/2907069 · DOI
  68. [88][88] Marcel Woide, Mark Colley, Nicole Damm, and Martin Baumann. 2022. Effect of System Capability Verification on Conflict, Trust, and Behavior in Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Yong Gu Ji and Myounghoon Jeon (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119–130. doi:10.1145/3543174.3545253 · DOI
  69. [89][89] Jiawei Yang, Xinyue Yu, MenggeWang, Zhenhao Chen, and Hao Tan. 2022. Novel Tactile Feedback Research for Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles. In With Design: Reinventing Design Modes, Gerhard Bruyns and Huaxin Wei (Eds.). Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2874–2887. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4472- 7_186 · DOI
  70. [90][90] Koji Yatani, Nikola Banovic, and Khai Truong. 2012. SpaceSense: Representing Geographical Information to Visually Impaired People Using Spatial Tactile Feedback. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Joseph A. Konstan, Ed H. Chi, and Kristina Höök (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 415–424. doi:10.1145/2207676.2207734 · DOI
  71. [91][91] Fang You, Xu Yan, Jun Zhang, and Wei Cui. 2022. Design Factors of Shared Situation Awareness Interface in Human–Machine Co-Driving. Information 13, 9 (2022), 437. doi:10.3390/info13090437 · DOI
  72. [92][92] Limin Zeng, Mei Miao, and Gerhard Weber. 2015. Interactive Audio-haptic Map Explorer on a Tactile Display. Interacting with Computers 27, 4 (2015), 413–429. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwu006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meinhardt, L.-M., Weilke, L. M., Elhaidary, M., von Abel, J., Fink, P. D. S., Rietzler, M., Colley, M., & Rukzio, E.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Ulm University, Institute of Media Informatics, Ulm, Germany
  • University of Maine (US)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-04-25
Pages
1-20
DOI
10.1145/3706598.3713454
OpenAlex
W4406733340
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1
FWCI
13.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (536409562)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
highly automated vehicles, visually impaired people, blind people, multimodal interfaces, auditory guidance, tactile feedback, spatial orientation, situational awareness, mental demand, urban and rural areas, Pathfinder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review