Cited by 33Tactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface Design

Design Guidelines for Schematizing and Rendering Haptically Perceivable Graphical Elements on Touchscreen Devices

Palani, Hari P., Fink, Paul D. S., Giudice, Nicholas A.·2020·International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract

This paper explores the viability of new touchscreen-based haptic/vibrotactile interactions as a primary modality for perceiving visual graphical elements in eyes-free situations. For touchscreen-based haptic information extraction to be both accurate and meaningful, the onscreen graphical elements should be schematized and downsampled to: (1) maximize the perceptual specificity of touch-based sensing and (2) account for the technical characteristics of touchscreen interfaces. To this end, six human behavioral studies were conducted with 64 blind and 105 blindfolded-sighted participants. Experiments 1–3 evaluated three key rendering parameters that are necessary for supporting touchscreen-based vibrotactile perception of graphical information, with results providing empirical guidance on both minimally detectable and functionally discriminable line widths, inter-line spacing, and angular separation that should be maintained. Experiments 4–6 evaluated perceptually-motivated design guidelines governing visual-to-vibrotactile schematization required for tasks involving information extraction, learning, and cognition of multi-line paths (e.g., transit-maps and corridor-intersections), with results providing clear guidance as to the stimulus parameters maximizing accuracy and temporal performance. The six empirically-validated guidelines presented here, based on results from 169 participants, provide designers and content providers with much-needed guidance on effectively incorpor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2020.1752464

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VAMs use the phone's native vibration motor and audio output to render oriented haptic lines with audio information that together have been shown to aid in cognitive map development.

    “Leveraging design guidelines for smartphone-based implementation [20], VAMs use the phone's native vibration motor and audio output capabilities to render oriented haptic lines with audio information that together have been shown to aid in cognitive map development [19].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palani, H. P., Fink, P. D. S., & Giudice, N. A.
Affiliations
University of Maine (US)
Corresponding author
Palani, Hari P.
Venue
International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Published
2020-04-29
Volume
36
Issue
15
Pages
1393-1414
ISSN
  • 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7590
OpenAlex
W3022853852
Cited by
33
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
vibrotactile feedback, eyes-free interaction, line width, angular separation, blind users, transit maps, design guidelines, information extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review