Cited by 6Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Generative AI for medical education: Insights from a case study with medical students and an AI tutor for clinical reasoning

Wang, Amy, Ruparel, Roma, Iurchenko, Anna, Jhun, Paul, Séguin, Julie Anne, Strachan, Patricia, Wong, Renee, Karthikesalingam, Alan +6 more·2025·Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3706599.3721208

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wang et al. compared a Socratic AI tutor, which asked questions rather than delivered answers, to standard AI and found greater clinical reasoning engagement in the Socratic condition.

    “Wang et al. compared a Socratic AI tutor, which asked questions rather than delivered answers, to standard AI and found greater clinical reasoning engagement in the Socratic condition 27 .”

    From AI-induced never-skilling in medical education (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, A., Ruparel, R., Iurchenko, A., Jhun, P., Séguin, J. A., Strachan, P., Wong, R., Karthikesalingam, A., Matias, Y., Hassidim, A., Webster, D., Semturs, C., Krause, J., & Schaekermann, M.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-04-25
Pages
1-8
OpenAlex
W4409720331
Cited by
6
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
6.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
generative AI, medical education, AI tutors, clinical reasoning, medical students, AI-assisted learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review