Uncertainty Quantification and Confidence Calibration in Large Language Models: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) enhances the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) by estimating confidence in outputs, enabling risk mitigation and selective prediction. However, traditional UQ methods struggle with LLMs due to computational constraints and decoding inconsistencies. Moreover, LLMs introduce unique uncertainty sources, such as input ambiguity, reasoning path divergence, and decoding stochasticity, that extend beyond classical aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. To address this, we introduce a new taxonomy that categorizes UQ methods based on computational efficiency and uncertainty dimensions, including input, reasoning, parameter, and prediction uncertainty. We evaluate existing techniques, summarize existing benchmarks and metrics for UQ, assess their real-world applicability, and identify open challenges, emphasizing the need for scalable, interpretable, and robust UQ approaches to enhance LLM reliability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The introduction of uncertainty quantification and confidence calibration techniques enables models to provide confidence scores or intervals alongside their outputs, allowing clinicians to make risk-stratified, human-in-the-loop decisions.
“Second, the introduction of UQ and confidence calibration techniques enables models to provide confidence scores or intervals alongside their outputs, allowing clinicians to make risk-stratified, human-in-the-loop decisions [143].”
From Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics (2026) · cites this paper as [143]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3703155 · Cited by 2,142 · see citing works
TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension
Joshi, M., Choi, E., Weld, D., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1147 · Cited by 1,690 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is often evaluated as a binary clas-sification task, the rationale being that high uncertainty shouldcor-respond to low expected accuracy.”
RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinations
Lai, G., Xie, Q., Liu, H., Yang, Y., & Hovy, E. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1082 · Cited by 1,044 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…[143], GSM8K [13], CalibratedMath [75] Factuality TruthfulQA [76], FEVER [123], HaluE-val [70], FActScore [90] General Knowledge MMLU [41], GPQA [110], HellaSwag [150] Consistency & Am-biguity ParaRel [30], AmbigQA [92], Ambi-gInst [43] Table 3: Categorization of datasets and benchmarks. multi-hop…”
TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods
Lin, S., Hilton, J., & Evans, O. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.229 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?
Zellers, R., Holtzman, A., Bisk, Y., Farhadi, A., & Choi, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1472 · Cited by 830 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The structured nature of these benchmarks allows for clear evaluation of the model’s confidence in its predictions.”
Jin, D., Pan, E., Oufattole, N., Weng, W.-H., Fang, H., & Szolovits, P. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11146421 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
A tutorial on conformal prediction
Shafer, G., & Vovk, V. (2007) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0706.3188 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation
Min, S., Krishna, K., Lyu, X., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-T., Koh, P., Iyyer, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Hajishirzi, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.741 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Reliability of Subjective Probability Forecasts of Precipitation and Temperature
Murphy, A. H., & Winkler, R. L. (1977) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346866 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models
Li, J., Cheng, X., Zhao, X., Nie, J.-Y., & Wen, J.-R. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.397 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
<i>Did Aristotle Use a Laptop?</i> A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies
Geva, M., Khashabi, D., Segal, E., Khot, T., Roth, D., & Berant, J. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00370 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Measuring and improving consistency in pretrained language models
Elazar, Y., Kassner, N., Ravfogel, S., Ravichander, A., Hovy, E., Schütze, H., & Goldberg, Y. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00410 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback
Madaan, A., Tandon, N., Gupta, P., Hallinan, S., Gao, L., Wiegreffe, S., Alon, U., Dziri, N., Prabhumoye, S., Yang, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17651 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lying
Azaria, A., & Mitchell, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.13734 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It’s Lying
Azaria, A., & Mitchell, T. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.68 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Cheong, I., Xia, K., Feng, K. J. K., Chen, Q. Z., & Zhang, A. X. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659048 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(LLMs) like GPT-4 [1] and PaLM [2] have achieved remarkable capabilities in text generation, reasoning, and decision-making, driving their adoption in high-stakes domains such as healthcare diagnostics [23, 37, 104, 127], legal analysis [11, 28, 53], and transportation systems [17, 57, 66, 164].”
Fact-checking the output of large language models via token-level uncertainty quantification
Fadeeva, E., Rubashevskii, A., Shelmanov, A., Petrakov, S., Li, H., Mubarak, H., Tsymbalov, E., Kuzmin, G., Panchenko, A., Baldwin, T., et al. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.558 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph
Vashurin, R., Fadeeva, E., Vazhentsev, A., Rvanova, L., Vasilev, D., Tsvigun, A., Petrakov, S., Xing, R., Sadallah, A., Grishchenkov, K., et al. (2025) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00737 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations
Panickssery, A., Bowman, S. R., & Feng, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.13076 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 121
- Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Floren- cia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 (2023). · arXiv
- Joris Baan, Wilker Aziz, Barbara Plank, and Raquel Fernández. 2022. Stop Measuring Calibration When Humans Disagree. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 1892-1915.
- Oleksandr Balabanov and Hampus Linander. 2024. Uncertainty quantification in fine-tuned LLMs using LoRA ensembles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12264 (2024). · arXiv
- Evan Becker and Stefano Soatto. 2024. Cycles of thought: Measuring llm confi- dence through stable explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03441 (2024). · arXiv
- Jiuhai Chen and Jonas Mueller. 2024. Quantifying Uncertainty in Answers from any Language Model and Enhancing their Trustworthiness. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 5186-5200.
- Tiejin Chen, Kuan-Ru Liou, Mithun Shivakoti, Aaryan Gaur, Pragya Kumari, Meiqi Guo, and Hua Wei. 2025. Abg-SciQA: A dataset for Understanding and Re- solving Ambiguity in Scientific Questions. In ICLR 2025 Workshop on Navigating and Addressing Data Problems for Foundation Models.
- Tiejin Chen, Xiaoou Liu, Longchao Da, Jia Chen, Vagelis Papalexakis, and Hua Wei. 2025. Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models through Multi-Dimensional Responses. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16820 (2025). · arXiv
- Zizhang Chen, Peizhao Li, Xiaomeng Dong, and Pengyu Hong. 2024. Uncertainty Quantification for Clinical Outcome Predictions with (Large) Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03497 (2024). · arXiv
- John Cherian, Isaac Gibbs, and Emmanuel Candes. 2025. Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods. Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems 37 (2025), 114812-114842.
- Karl Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju, Mohammad Bavarian, Mark Chen, Heewoo Jun, Lukasz Kaiser, Matthias Plappert, Jerry Tworek, Jacob Hilton, Reiichiro Nakano, Christopher Hesse, and John Schulman. 2021. Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168 (2021). · arXiv
- Jeremy Cole, Michael Zhang, Dan Gillick, Julian Eisenschlos, Bhuwan Dhingra, and Jacob Eisenstein. 2023. Selectively Answering Ambiguous Questions. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 530-543.
- Antonia Creswell, Murray Shanahan, and Irina Higgins. [n. d.]. Selection- Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Rea- soning. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Longchao Da, Tiejin Chen, Lu Cheng, and Hua Wei. 2024. Llm uncertainty quantification through directional entailment graph and claim level response augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00994 (2024). · arXiv
- Longchao Da, Minquan Gao, Hao Mei, and Hua Wei. 2024. Prompt to transfer: Sim-to-real transfer for traffic signal control with prompt learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38. 82-90.
- Longchao Da, Kuanru Liou, Tiejin Chen, Xuesong Zhou, Xiangyong Luo, Yezhou Yang, and Hua Wei. 2024. Open-ti: Open traffic intelligence with augmented language model. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 15, 10 (2024), 4761-4786.
- Longchao Da, Xiaoou Liu, Jiaxin Dai, Lu Cheng, Yaqing Wang, and Hua Wei. 2025. Understanding the Uncertainty of LLM Explanations: A Perspective Based on Reasoning Topology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17026 (2025). · arXiv
- Longchao Da, Hao Mei, Romir Sharma, and Hua Wei. 2023. Uncertainty-aware grounded action transformation towards sim-to-real transfer for traffic signal control. In 2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). 1124-1129.
- Longchao Da, Rui Wang, Xiaojian Xu, Parminder Bhatia, Taha Kass-Hout, Hua Wei, and Cao Xiao. 2024. Segment as You Wish-Free-Form Language-Based Segmentation for Medical Images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12831 (2024). · arXiv
- Irene de Zarzà, Joachim de Curtò, Gemma Roig, and Carlos T Calafate. 2023. LLM multimodal traffic accident forecasting. Sensors 23, 22 (2023), 9225.
- Yang Deng, Shuaiyi Li, and Wai Lam. 2023. Learning to ask clarification ques- tions with spatial reasoning. In Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2113-2117.
- Armen Der Kiureghian and Ove Ditlevsen. 2009. Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural safety 31, 2 (2009), 105-112.
- Jinhao Duan, Hao Cheng, Shiqi Wang, Alex Zavalny, Chenan Wang, Renjing Xu, Bhavya Kailkhura, and Kaidi Xu. 2024. Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 5050-5063.
- Ekaterina Fadeeva, Roman Vashurin, Akim Tsvigun, Artem Vazhentsev, Sergey Petrakov, Kirill Fedyanin, Daniil Vasilev, Elizaveta Goncharova, Alexander Panchenko, Maxim Panov, et al. 2023. LM-Polygraph: Uncertainty Estima- tion for Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. 446-461.
- Yarin Gal and Zoubin Ghahramani. 2016. Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In international conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1050-1059.
- Xiang Gao, Jiaxin Zhang, Lalla Mouatadid, and Kamalika Das. 2024. SPUQ: Perturbation-Based Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2336-2346.
- Mario Giulianelli, Joris Baan, Wilker Aziz, Raquel Fernández, and Barbara Plank. 2023. What Comes Next? Evaluating Uncertainty in Neural Text Generators Against Human Production Variability. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 14349-14371.
- Olga Golovneva, Moya Peng Chen, Spencer Poff, Martin Corredor, Luke Zettle- moyer, Maryam Fazel-Zarandi, and Asli Celikyilmaz. [n. d.]. ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Meiqi Guo, Mingda Zhang, Siva Reddy, and Malihe Alikhani. 2021. Abg-coqa: Clarifying ambiguity in conversational question answering. 3rd Conference on Automated Knowledge Base Construction (2021).
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020. Measuring massive multitask language un- derstanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300 (2020). · arXiv
- Jay Heo, Hae Beom Lee, Saehoon Kim, Juho Lee, Kwang Joon Kim, Eunho Yang, and Sung Ju Hwang. 2018. Uncertainty-aware attention for reliable interpretation and prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).
- Bairu Hou, Yujian Liu, Kaizhi Qian, Jacob Andreas, Shiyu Chang, and Yang Zhang. 2024. Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning.
- Hsiu-Yuan Huang, Yutong Yang, Zhaoxi Zhang, Sanwoo Lee, and Yunfang Wu. 2024. A survey of uncertainty estimation in llms: Theory meets practice. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15326 (2024). · arXiv
- Jingwang Huang, Jiang Zhong, Qin Lei, Jinpeng Gao, Yuming Yang, Sirui Wang, Peiguang Li, and Kaiwen Wei. 2025. Latent Distribution Decoupling: A Proba- bilistic Framework for Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal Emotion Recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13954 (2025). · arXiv
- Lifu Huang, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, and Yejin Choi. 2019. Cosmos QA: Machine reading comprehension with contextual commonsense reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00277 (2019). · arXiv
- Yukun Huang, Yixin Liu, Raghuveer Thirukovalluru, Arman Cohan, and Bhuwan Dhingra. 2024. Calibrating Long-form Generations From Large Language Mod- els. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024. 13441-13460.
- Eyke Hüllermeier and Willem Waegeman. 2021. Aleatoric and epistemic uncer- tainty in machine learning: An introduction to concepts and methods. Machine learning 110, 3 (2021), 457-506.
- Fushuo Huo, Wenchao Xu, Zhong Zhang, Haozhao Wang, Zhicheng Chen, and Peilin Zhao. 2024. Self-introspective decoding: Alleviating hallucinations for large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02032 (2024). · arXiv
- Abhyuday Jagannatha and Hong Yu. 2020. Calibrating Structured Output Predictors for Natural Language Processing. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2078-2092.
- Heinrich Jiang, Been Kim, Maya Gupta, and Melody Y. Guan. 2018. To trust or not to trust a classifier. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
- Zhengbao Jiang, Jun Araki, Haibo Ding, and Graham Neubig. 2021. How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answering. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2021), 962-977.
- Saurav Kadavath, Tom Conerly, Amanda Askell, Tom Henighan, Dawn Drain, Ethan Perez, Nicholas Schiefer, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Nova DasSarma, Eli Tran- Johnson, et al. 2022. Language models (mostly) know what they know. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05221 (2022). · arXiv
- Sanyam Kapoor, Nate Gruver, Manley Roberts, Arka Pal, Samuel Dooley, Micah Goldblum, and Andrew Wilson. 2024. Calibration-Tuning: Teaching Large Language Models to Know What They Don't Know. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Uncertainty-Aware NLP (UncertaiNLP 2024). 1-14.
- Lorenz Kuhn, Yarin Gal, and Sebastian Farquhar. 2023. Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Genera- tion. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Aviral Kumar and Sunita Sarawagi. 2019. Calibration of encoder decoder models for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00802 (2019). · arXiv
- Bhawesh Kumar, Charlie Lu, Gauri Gupta, Anil Palepu, David Bellamy, Ramesh Raskar, and Andrew Beam. 2023. Conformal prediction with large language models for multi-choice question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18404 (2023). · arXiv
- Siqi Lai, Zhao Xu, Weijia Zhang, Hao Liu, and Hui Xiong. 2025. LLMLight: Large Language Models as Traffic Signal Control Agents. 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2025).
- Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Alexander Pritzel, and Charles Blundell. 2017. Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- Baolin Li, Yankai Jiang, Vijay Gadepally, and Devesh Tiwari. 2024. Llm in- ference serving: Survey of recent advances and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12391 (2024). · arXiv
- Lincan Li, Jiaqi Li, Catherine Chen, Fred Gui, Hongjia Yang, Chenxiao Yu, Zheng- guang Wang, Jianing Cai, Junlong Aaron Zhou, Bolin Shen, et al. 2024. Political- llm: Large language models in political science. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06864 (2024). · arXiv
- Yaowei Li, Bang Yang, Xuxin Cheng, Zhihong Zhu, Hongxiang Li, and Yuexian Zou. 2023. Unify, align and refine: Multi-level semantic alignment for radiology report generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 2863-2874.
- Zixuan Li, Jing Xiong, Fanghua Ye, Chuanyang Zheng, Xun Wu, Jianqiao Lu, Zhongwei Wan, Xiaodan Liang, Chengming Li, Zhenan Sun, et al. 2024. Un- certaintyRAG: Span-Level Uncertainty Enhanced Long-Context Modeling for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02719 (2024). · arXiv
- Kaiqu Liang, Zixu Zhang, and Jaime Fisac. 2024. Introspective Planning: Align- ing Robots' Uncertainty with Inherent Task Ambiguity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 71998-72031.
- Siyuan Liang, Jiawei Liang, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Aishan Liu, Ee-Chien Chang, and Xiaochun Cao. 2024. Revisiting backdoor attacks against large vision- language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18844 (2024). · arXiv
- Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, and Owain Evans. 2022. Teaching models to express their uncertainty in words. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.14334 (2022). · arXiv
- Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, and Jimeng Sun. 2024. Contextualized Sequence Likelihood: Enhanced Confidence Scores for Natural Language Generation. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 10351-10368.
- Chen Ling, Xujiang Zhao, Xuchao Zhang, Wei Cheng, Yanchi Liu, Yiyou Sun, Mika Oishi, Takao Osaki, Katsushi Matsuda, Jie Ji, Guangji Bai, Liang Zhao, and Haifeng Chen. 2024. Uncertainty Quantification for In-Context Learning of Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 3357-3370.
- Linyu Liu, Yu Pan, Xiaocheng Li, and Guanting Chen. 2024. Uncertainty estima- tion and quantification for llms: A simple supervised approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15993 (2024). · arXiv
- Shudong Liu, Zhaocong Li, Xuebo Liu, Runzhe Zhan, Derek Wong, Lidia Chao, and Min Zhang. 2024. Can LLMs learn uncertainty on their own? expressing uncertainty effectively in a self-training manner. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 21635-21645.
- Xin Liu, Muhammad Khalifa, and Lu Wang. 2024. LitCab: Lightweight Lan- guage Model Calibration over Short-and Long-form Responses. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Xiaoou Liu, Zhen Lin, Longchao Da, Chacha Chen, Shubhendu Trivedi, and Hua Wei. 2025. MCQA-Eval: Efficient Confidence Evaluation in NLG with Gold-Standard Correctness Labels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14268 (2025). · arXiv
- Jinliang Lu, Ziliang Pang, Min Xiao, Yaochen Zhu, Rui Xia, and Jiajun Zhang. 2024. Merge, ensemble, and cooperate! a survey on collaborative strategies in the era of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06089 (2024). · arXiv
- Andrey Malinin and Mark Gales. 2021. Uncertainty Estimation in Autoregressive Structured Prediction. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Potsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, and Mark Gales. [n. d.]. SelfCheckGPT: Zero- Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models. In 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
- Katerina Margatina, Timo Schick, Nikolaos Aletras, and Jane Dwivedi-Yu. 2023. Active Learning Principles for In-Context Learning with Large Language Models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 5011-5034.
- Sewon Min, Julian Michael, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2020. AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questions. In EMNLP.
- Shentong Mo and Miao Xin. 2024. Tree of uncertain thoughts reasoning for large language models. In ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 12742-12746.
- Philipp Mondorf and Barbara Plank. 2024. Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models-A Survey. In First Conference on Language Modeling.
- Maria Mora-Cross and Saul Calderon-Ramirez. 2024. Uncertainty estimation in large language models to support biodiversity conservation. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 6: Industry Track). 368-378.
- Subhabrata Mukherjee and Ahmed Awadallah. 2020. Uncertainty-aware self- training for few-shot text classification. Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems 33 (2020), 21199-21212.
- James F Mullen Jr and Dinesh Manocha. 2024. LAP, Using Action Feasibility for Improved Uncertainty Alignment of Large Language Model Planners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13198 (2024). · arXiv
- Alexander Nikitin, Jannik Kossen, Yarin Gal, and Pekka Marttinen. 2024. Kernel language entropy: Fine-grained uncertainty quantification for LLMs from se- mantic similarities. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 8901-8929.
- Hyobin Ong, Youngwoo Yoon, Jaewoo Choi, and Minsu Jang. 2024. A Simple Baseline for Uncertainty-Aware Language-Oriented Task Planner for Embodied Agents. In 2024 21st International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR). 677-682.
- Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 311-318.
- Jianing Qiu, Kyle Lam, Guohao Li, Amish Acharya, Tien Yin Wong, Ara Darzi, Wu Yuan, and Eric J Topol. 2024. LLM-based agentic systems in medicine and healthcare. Nature Machine Intelligence 6, 12 (2024), 1418-1420.
- Victor Quach, Adam Fisch, Tal Schuster, Adam Yala, Jae Ho Sohn, Tommi S Jaakkola, and Regina Barzilay. [n. d.]. Conformal Language Modeling. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250 (2016). · arXiv
- Siva Reddy, Danqi Chen, and Christopher D Manning. 2019. Coqa: A con- versational question answering challenge. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 7 (2019), 249-266.
- David Rein, Betty Li Hou, Asa Cooper Stickland, Jackson Petty, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Julien Dirani, Julian Michael, and Samuel R Bowman. 2024. Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark. In First Conference on Language Modeling.
- Jie Ren, Jiaming Luo, Yao Zhao, Kundan Krishna, Mohammad Saleh, Balaji Laksh- minarayanan, and Peter J Liu. 2023. Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Jie Ren, Yao Zhao, Tu Vu, Peter J. Liu, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan. 2023. Self-Evaluation Improves Selective Generation in Large Language Models. In Proceedings on "I Can't Believe It's Not Better: Failure Modes in the Age of Foun- dation Models" at NeurIPS 2023 Workshops, Vol. 239. 49-64.
- Thomas Savage, John Wang, Robert Gallo, Abdessalem Boukil, Vishwesh Patel, Seyed Amir Ahmad Safavi-Naini, Ali Soroush, and Jonathan H Chen. 2024. Large language model uncertainty measurement and calibration for medical diagnosis and treatment. medRxiv (2024), 2024-06.
- Sagar Sen, Victor Gonzalez, Erik Johannes Husom, Simeon Tverdal, Shukun Tokas, and Svein O Tjøsvoll. 2024. ERG-AI: enhancing occupational ergonomics with uncertainty-aware ML and LLM feedback. Applied Intelligence 54, 23 (2024), 12128-12155.
- Murat Sensoy, Lance Kaplan, and Melih Kandemir. 2018. Evidential deep learning to quantify classification uncertainty. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).
- Ola Shorinwa, Zhiting Mei, Justin Lidard, Allen Z Ren, and Anirudha Majum- dar. 2024. A survey on uncertainty quantification of large language models: Taxonomy, open research challenges, and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05563 (2024). · arXiv
- Elias Stengel-Eskin and Benjamin Van Durme. 2023. Calibrated Interpretation: Confidence Estimation in Semantic Parsing. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 11 (2023), 1213-1231.
- Jiayuan Su, Jing Luo, Hongwei Wang, and Lu Cheng. 2024. API Is Enough: Conformal Prediction for Large Language Models Without Logit-Access. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024. 979-995.
- Wei Suo, Lijun Zhang, Mengyang Sun, Lin Yuanbo Wu, Peng Wang, and Yanning Zhang. 2025. Octopus: Alleviating Hallucination via Dynamic Contrastive Decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00361 (2025). · arXiv
- James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018. FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and VERification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05355 (2018). · arXiv
- Katherine Tian, Eric Mitchell, Allan Zhou, Archit Sharma, Rafael Rafailov, Huaxiu Yao, Chelsea Finn, and Christopher Manning. 2023. Just Ask for Cali- bration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 5433-5442.
- Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai, Walter Talbott, and Jian Zhang. 2024. Efficient Non- Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Black-Box Large Language Models and Decision Planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00251 (2024). · arXiv
- Dennis Ulmer, Martin Gubri, Hwaran Lee, Sangdoo Yun, and Seong Oh. 2024. Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Only. In Proceed- ings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 15440-15459.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- Artem Vazhentsev, Gleb Kuzmin, Akim Tsvigun, Alexander Panchenko, Maxim Panov, Mikhail Burtsev, and Artem Shelmanov. 2023. Hybrid uncertainty quan- tification for selective text classification in ambiguous tasks. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 11659-11681.
- Boshi Wang, Xiang Yue, Yu Su, and Huan Sun. 2024. Grokking of implicit reasoning in transformers: A mechanistic journey to the edge of generalization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 95238-95265.
- Shuo Wang, Zhaopeng Tu, Shuming Shi, and Yang Liu. 2020. On the Inference Calibration of Neural Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Yibin Wang, Haizhou Shi, Ligong Han, Dimitris Metaxas, and Hao Wang. 2025. Blob: Bayesian low-rank adaptation by backpropagation for large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2025), 67758- 67794.
- Zhiyuan Wang, Jinhao Duan, Lu Cheng, Yue Zhang, Qingni Wang, Xiaoshuang Shi, Kaidi Xu, Heng Tao Shen, and Xiaofeng Zhu. 2024. ConU: Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Correctness Coverage Guarantees. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 6886-6898.
- Jiaxin Wu, Yizhou Yu, and Hong-Yu Zhou. 2024. Uncertainty Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Question Answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08662 (2024). · arXiv
- Shuo Xing, Yuping Wang, Peiran Li, Ruizheng Bai, Yueqi Wang, Chan-wei Hu, Chengxuan Qian, Huaxiu Yao, and Zhengzhong Tu. 2025. Re-Align: Aligning Vi- sion Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference Optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13146 (2025). · arXiv
- Miao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, YIFEI LI, Jie Fu, Junxian He, and Bryan Hooi. 2024. Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Miao Xiong, Andrea Santilli, Michael Kirchhof, Adam Golinski, and Sinead Williamson. 2024. Efficient and effective uncertainty quantification for LLMs. In Neurips Safe Generative AI Workshop 2024.
- Adam X Yang, Maxime Robeyns, Xi Wang, and Laurence Aitchison. [n. d.]. Bayesian Low-rank Adaptation for Large Language Models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Yongjin Yang, Haneul Yoo, and Hwaran Lee. 2025. MAQA: Evaluating Uncer- tainty Quantification in LLMs Regarding Data Uncertainty. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025. 5846-5863.
- Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William W Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D Manning. 2018. HotpotQA: A dataset for di- verse, explainable multi-hop question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09600 (2018). · arXiv
- Huaiyuan Yao, Longchao Da, Vishnu Nandam, Justin Turnau, Zhiwei Liu, Linsey Pang, and Hua Wei. 2025. Comal: Collaborative multi-agent large language models for mixed-autonomy traffic. In Proceedings of the 2025 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM). 409-418.
- Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Tom Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. 2023. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. Advances in neural information processing systems 36 (2023), 11809-11822.
- Fanghua Ye, Mingming Yang, Jianhui Pang, Longyue Wang, Derek Wong, Emine Yilmaz, Shuming Shi, and Zhaopeng Tu. 2025. Benchmarking llms via uncer- tainty quantification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2025), 15356-15385.
- Kai Ye, Tiejin Chen, Hua Wei, and Liang Zhan. 2024. Uncertainty regularized evi- dential regression. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38. 16460-16468.
- Zhangyue Yin, Qiushi Sun, Qipeng Guo, Zhiyuan Zeng, Xiaonan Li, Junqi Dai, Qinyuan Cheng, Xuan-Jing Huang, and Xipeng Qiu. 2024. Reasoning in flux: Enhancing large language models reasoning through uncertainty-aware adaptive guidance. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2401-2416.
- Spencer Young, Porter Jenkins, Lonchao Da, Jeff Dotson, and Hua Wei. 2025. Flexible heteroscedastic count regression with deep double poisson networks. International Conference on Machine Learning (2025).
- Hamed Zamani, Susan Dumais, Nick Craswell, Paul Bennett, and Gord Lueck. 2020. Generating clarifying questions for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the web conference 2020. 418-428.
- Boxuan Zhang and Ruqi Zhang. 2025. CoT-UQ: Improving Response-wise Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs with Chain-of-Thought. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17214 (2025). · arXiv
- Caiqi Zhang, Fangyu Liu, Marco Basaldella, and Nigel Collier. 2024. LUQ: Long- text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 5244-5262.
- Ruiyang Zhang, Hu Zhang, and Zhedong Zheng. 2024. VL-Uncertainty: Detect- ing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Model via Uncertainty Estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11919 (2024). · arXiv
- Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. [n. d.]. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Yuan Zhang, Tao Huang, Chun-Kai Fan, Hongyuan Dong, Jiawen Li, Jiacong Wang, Kuan Cheng, Shanghang Zhang, Haoyuan Guo, et al. 2024. Unveiling the tapestry of consistency in large vision-language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 118632-118653.
- Zheng Zhang, Xu Yuan, Lei Zhu, Jingkuan Song, and Liqiang Nie. 2024. BadCM: Invisible backdoor attack against cross-modal learning. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (2024).
- Guosheng Zhao, Zijian Zhao, Wuxian Gong, and Feng Li. 2023. Radiology report generation with medical knowledge and multilevel image-report alignment: A new method and its verification. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 146 (2023), 102714.
- Yao Zhao, Mikhail Khalman, Rishabh Joshi, Shashi Narayan, Mohammad Saleh, and Peter J Liu. 2023. Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generation. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Chujie Zheng, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, and Minlie Huang. 2023. Large language models are not robust multiple choice selectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03882 (2023). · arXiv
- Zhi Zheng, Qian Feng, Hang Li, Alois Knoll, and Jianxiang Feng. 2024. Evaluating uncertainty-based failure detection for closed-loop llm planners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.00430 (2024). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metacognition and Uncertainty Communication in Humans and Large Language Models
Steyvers, M., & Peters, M. A. K. (2026) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214251391158 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Xie, X., Wu, C., Huang, Z., Zhou, Y., Huang, J., Dao, F., Yan, D., Deng, K., Lyu, H., Ma, C., et al. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag083 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Second, the introduction of UQ and confidence calibration techniques enables models to provide confidence scores or intervals alongside their outputs, allowing clinicians to make risk-stratified, human-in-the-loop decisions [143].”
- Authors
- Liu, X., Chen, T., Da, L., Chen, C., Lin, Z., & Wei, H.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2025-08-03
- Pages
- 6107-6117
- OpenAlex
- W4412875472
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 8
- FWCI
- 50.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2421839)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- uncertainty quantification, large language models, confidence calibration, aleatoric uncertainty, epistemic uncertainty, uncertainty taxonomy, uncertainty measures, LLM reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review