PreprintCited by 1,010Machine Learning and AlgorithmsAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchStatistical Methods and Inference

A tutorial on conformal prediction

Open access
Shafer, Glenn, Vovk, Vladimir·2007·arXiv

Abstract

Conformal prediction uses past experience to determine precise levels of confidence in new predictions. Given an error probability $ε$, together with a method that makes a prediction $\hat{y}$ of a label $y$, it produces a set of labels, typically containing $\hat{y}$, that also contains $y$ with probability $1-ε$. Conformal prediction can be applied to any method for producing $\hat{y}$: a nearest-neighbor method, a support-vector machine, ridge regression, etc. Conformal prediction is designed for an on-line setting in which labels are predicted successively, each one being revealed before the next is predicted. The most novel and valuable feature of conformal prediction is that if the successive examples are sampled independently from the same distribution, then the successive predictions will be right $1-ε$ of the time, even though they are based on an accumulating dataset rather than on independent datasets. In addition to the model under which successive examples are sampled independently, other on-line compression models can also use conformal prediction. The widely used Gaussian linear model is one of these. This tutorial presents a self-contained account of the theory of conformal prediction and works through several numerical examples. A more comprehensive treatment of the topic is provided in "Algorithmic Learning in a Random World", by Vladimir Vovk, Alex Gammerman, and Glenn Shafer (Springer, 2005).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.0706.3188

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conformal prediction is a distribution-free, post-hoc framework that operates on saved model predictions, so it can be applied to any auto contouring algorithm without touching the model.

    “It is a distribution‐free, post‐hoc framework that operates on saved model predictions, so it can be applied to any auto contouring algorithm without touching the model. 21”

    From Uncertainty quantification of U‐Net based segmentation tool using conformal prediction (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Abstract says conformal prediction can be applied to any method that produces a prediction, and the Introduction says its validity does not depend on the probability distribution under exchangeability. But the tutorial describes an on-line procedure using past examples; it does not establish that conformal prediction operates on saved model predictions, requires no changes to a model, or has been applied to auto-contouring algorithms. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

14 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Peter J. Bickel and Kjell A. Doksum. Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topics. Volume I. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, second edition, 2001.
  2. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, Fehlerausgleichung, Kollektivmasslehre. Teub- ner, Leipzig and Berlin, third edition, 2000.
  3. Per Martin-Löf. Repetitive structures and the relation between canonical and microcanonical distributions in statistics and statistical mechanics. In Ole E. Barndorff-Nielsen, Preben Blæsild, and Geert Schou, editors, Pro- ceedings of Conference on Foundational Questions in Statistical Inference, pages 271-294, Aarhus, 1974. Memoirs 1.
  4. G. A. F. Seber and A. J. Lee. Linear Regression Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, second edition, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shafer, G., & Vovk, V.
Affiliations
Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2007
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171585602
Cited by
655
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Holloway Digital Repository (Royal Holloway University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
conformal prediction, prediction intervals, confidence intervals, online learning, independent and identically distributed data, linear Gaussian models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review