Cited by 1Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataPatient Dignity and Privacy

From Patient Burdens to User Agency: Designing for Real-Time Protection Support in Online Health Consultations

Open access
Zhang, Shuning, Ma, Ying, Hu, Yongquan 'Owen', Dang, Ting, Jia, Hong, Yi, Xin, Li, Hewu·2025·Companion of the 2025 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing

Abstract

Online medical consultation platforms, while convenient, are undermined by significant privacy risks that erode user trust. We first conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 12 users to understand their perceptions of security and privacy landscapes on online medical consultation platforms, as well as their practices, challenges and expectation. Our analysis reveals a critical disconnect between users' desires for anonymity and control, and platform realities that offload the responsibility of "privacy labor". To bridge this gap, we present SafeShare, an interaction technique that leverages localized LLM to redact consultations in real-time. SafeShare balances utility and privacy through selectively anonymize private information. A technical evaluation of SafeShare's core PII detection module on 3 dataset demonstrates high efficacy, achieving 89.64% accuracy with Qwen3-4B on IMCS21 dataset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3714394.3756335

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing user control can potentially diminish the user's sense of agency.

    “This approach, however, introduces a known trade-off: increasing user control can also increase cognitive load and privacy fatigue [8], potentially diminishing the user's sense of agency [42,43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, S., Ma, Y., Hu, Y. '., Dang, T., Jia, H., Yi, X., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Companion of the 2025 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-10-12
Pages
1597-1604
OpenAlex
W7117449007
Cited by
0
References
29
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Dignity and Privacy
Keywords
online medical consultation, privacy, anonymity, personal information detection, user trust, health data protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review