Cited by 9Ethics and Social Impacts of AITechnology's Impact on MediaArtificial Intelligence Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Agentic Economy

Abstract

The architecture of agentic communication will determine the extent to which generative AI democratizes access to economic opportunity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3747175

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Rothschild, D. M., Mobius, M. M., Hofman, J. M., Dillon, E., Goldstein, D. G., Immorlica, N., Jaffe, S., Lucier, B., Slivkins, A., & Vogel, M.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
  • Microsoft Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2026-01-29
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
39-42
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W7125957219
Cited by
9
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 9
FWCI
51.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Technology's Impact on Media
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
generative AI, AI agents, economic opportunities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review