Unbiased Embodied Visual Representation Learning with Causal Inference and Cross-Modality Alignment
Open accessAbstract
Object Goal Navigation (ObjectNav) in novel environments relies on comprehensive scene understanding, including precise visual perception and accurate modeling of spatial-semantic regularities. However, excessive attention to the hand-crafted scene representation in prevailing approaches leads to the neglect of the negative influence of the perception bias hidden in the visual observations. The hand-crafted semantic distribution in domestic environments causes the spurious association bias, while the semantic conflict bias arises due to the dynamic perspective changes. Biased visual perception significantly limits the generalization of the navigation strategy. In this article, we propose the U nbiased E mbodied V isual R epresentation ( UEVR ), which overcomes the perception biases using causal inference and cross-modality alignment. Specifically, we establish reasonable assumptions about confounders for multi-object features through our proposed Unbiased Causal R-CNN framework and eliminate the spurious associations bias through B ackdoor I ntervention C ausal A djustment ( BICA ) module during navigation. To overcome the dynamic-view bias hidden in 2D image features, we propose to employ the cross-modality alignment mechanism with the Geometric Consistency ( GeoCon ) to encode 3D geometry prior into the 2D representations. Finally, we design a modular ObjectNav framework integrated with UEVR named Causal-ObjectNav , which consists of the corner-based scene exploration module and target object discrimination module. Extensive experiments on the MP3D and HM3D datasets demonstrate the superiority of the unbiased navigation model over existing ObjectNav methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 12 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning
Using an R-CNN to generate object bounding boxes and RoI features remains a biased paradigm that considers only observed context associations.
“Common practice is employing a Region-based Convolutional Neural Network(R-CNN) such as Faster R-CNN [48] to generate the bounding box of each object in the image and extract the feature of Region Of Interest(RoI).However, this is still a biased paradigm that only considers the observed context associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] 48. Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. 2016. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 39, 6 (2016), 1137-1149. source
- Findingown data
Experiments on MP3D and HM3D show the unbiased navigation model outperforms existing ObjectNav methods.
“Extensive experiments on the MP3D and HM3D datasets demonstrate the superiority of the unbiased navigation model over existing ObjectNav methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ablation and qualitative experiments indicate that UEVR helps prevent navigation failures caused by misidentification.
“In addition, the comprehensive ablative and qualitative experimental results demonstrate the contributions of the UEVR in avoiding navigation failures due to misidentification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After the same bias adjustment, the conditional probability of sofa given cushion rose to 36%.
“After applying the same bias adjustment technique, ( | ( ℎ )) increases to 36%, which indicates that inter-object associations are subject to a certain degree of reliable adjustment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In an analysis of images covering all Matterport3D scenes, the conditional probability of sofa given cushion was 24%.
“After detailed analysis of an image collection covering the full Matterport3D [4] scenes, we obtain an unexpected result that the ( | ℎ ) is relatively low at 24%, as illustrated in Fig. 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] 4. Angel Chang, Angela Dai, Thomas Funkhouser, Maciej Halber, Matthias Niessner, Manolis Savva, Shuran Song, Andy Zeng, and Yinda Zhang. 2017. Matterport3d: Learning from rgb-d data in indoor environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.06158 (2017). source
- Findingown data
Experimental results on downstream vision and ObjectNav tasks demonstrate that UEVR is superior.
“Sufficient experimental results on downstream vision and ObjectNav tasks demonstrate the superiority of our proposed UEVR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A single CMA training objective L fails to deliver optimal performance on both downstream tasks.
“Moreover, a single CMA training objective L fails to deliver optimal performance on both downstream tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ResNet50 trained from scratch displays the lowest results on both evaluation settings.
“The ResNet50 training from scratch displays the lowest results on both evaluation settings”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When only exploiting pre-trained ResNet50 as 2 for object discrimination, navigation performance reduces 2.5% and 2.0% in SR and SPL, respectively.
“In Table 4, when only exploiting the pre-trained ResNet50 as 2 for object discrimination, the navigation performance reduces 2.5% and 2.0% in terms of SR and SPL, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the bed-target example, the UEVR-based object discrimination module judged the erroneous segmentation result as not credible.
“our designed object discrimination module based on the UEVR judges that the current segmentation result is not credible”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The 3D geometric map M3 contains a longer-range spatial and semantic prior than the egocentric semantic map M2.
“the 3D geometric map M 3 contains a longer range spatial and semantic prior compared to the egocentric semantic map M 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
When navigating with 3D geometric points only, navigation performance achieves the most significant reduction.
“When navigating with 3D geometric points only, the navigation performance achieves the most significant reduction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Our method achieves optimal performance on MP3D ObjectNav, as presented in Table 3.
“Our method achieves the optimal performance, as presented in Table 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With the help of backdoor intervention, the causality of some object pairs gets corrected and becomes more reliable.
“With the help of the backdoor intervention, the causality of these pairs gets corrected and becomes more reliable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ResNet50 trained with loss function L improves AP50 score by 3.86 (Train Split) and 0.82 (Test Split) on ObjDet compared to training from scratch.
“The ResNet50 trained with the loss function L improves the AP50 score by 3.86(Train Split) and 0.82(Test Split) on ObjDet tasks compared to training from scratch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the bed-target example, the navigation process continued after the module judged the segmentation result not credible.
“and the navigation process continues”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When integrated into Causal-ObjectNav, the confounder set extracted by the non-causal baseline results in a 1.2% lower navigation SR compared to our proposed UC R-CNN.
“When integrated into the Causal-ObjectNav framework, the confounder set extracted by the non-causal baseline results in a 1.2% lower navigation SR compared to our proposed UC R-CNN, as shown in Table 7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the qualitative example with bed as the target, an error occurred in the semantic segmentation.
“However, when the agent searches for the bed, an error occurs in the semantic segmentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The corporation of BICA and 2 narrows the performance degradation down to 1.6% SR and 1.3% SPL.
“And the corporation of BICA and 2 narrows the performance degradation down to 1.6% SR and 1.3% SPL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the qualitative example with sofa as the target, Causal-ObjectNav successfully guided the agent to the sofa.
“As shown in Fig. 6, the Causal-ObjectNav guides the agent to navigate to the sofa successfully”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At timestep 272 in the bed-target example, the segmentation model misclassified part of the sofa and table around the cushion as the bed.
“At timestep = 272, the segmentation model erroneously classifies part of the sofa and table around the cushion as the bed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Cross-modality alignment with GeoCon encodes 3D geometry prior into 2D representations to overcome dynamic-view bias.
“we propose to employ the cross-modality alignment mechanism with the Geometric Constraints(GeoCon) to encode 3D geometry prior into the 2D representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The SCM indicates that biased visual features necessarily constrain downstream task performance via feature transmission.
“Although the visual confounders have no direct connection to the final action decisions, the SCM demonstrates that the biased visual features inevitably limit downstream task performance through feature transmission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
BICA eliminates spurious association bias during navigation.
“eliminate the spurious associations bias through Back-door Intervention Causal Adjustment(BICA) module during navigation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Combining the unbiased object confounder set with BICA produces an unbiased visual representation.
“By integrating the unbiased object confounder set with the BICA module, we obtain an unbiased visual representation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Visual causal confounders can be represented by average object features and their corresponding probability distribution.
- Premisecitation
Classical classifiers treat intuitive co-occurrences as true causal links and infer an observed object's semantic attributes from context features.
“Classical classifiers regard the intuitive co-occurrences as the real causal links, and recognize the semantic attributes of observed objects based on the context features, which can be denoted as ( | ), i.e., the link → .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] 42. Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie. 2018. The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. Basic books. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Interactive learning between 2D and 3D modalities enhances the self-adaptive ability of the visual perception model for dynamic viewpoint changes.
“Interactive learning between the 2D and 3D modalities enhances the self-adaptive ability of the visual perception model for dynamic viewpoint changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Multi-view observations implicitly correspond to the same solid geometric structure (GeoCon).
- Interpretationown data
Inter-object associations can be reliably adjusted to a certain degree by backdoor intervention.
“After applying the same bias adjustment technique, ( | ( ℎ )) increases to 36%, which indicates that inter-object associations are subject to a certain degree of reliable adjustment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In domestic settings, the semantic distribution created by hand causes a spurious-association bias.
“The hand-crafted semantic distribution in domestic environments causes the spurious association bias”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Biased visual perception significantly limits generalization of navigation strategy.
“Biased visual perception significantly limits the generalization of the navigation strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Earlier scene representation studies overlook how original visual features affect navigation decisions.
“Although the aforementioned works make many effective efforts at scene representation learning, they all neglect the impact of the original visual features on navigation decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
UC R-CNN's context classifier is trained with a back-door adjustment objective, which prevents bias in visual confounder features by clarifying context causal associations.
“The UC R-CNN is equipped with a context classifier that employs the back-door adjustment function ( | ( )) as the training objective, which avoids introducing bias into the visual confounder features by clarifying the context causal associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Visual causal confounders can be represented by average object features and their corresponding probability distribution.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The visual confounder set updates dynamically with visual backbone training, letting UC R-CNN iteratively use current confounders for causal inference.
“The visual confounder set is dynamically updated along with the visual backbone training process and enables UC R-CNN to iteratively incorporate the most up-to-date confounders for causal inference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A fixed set of semantic categories from the scene dataset adequately approximates all real-world confounders.
- Interpretationnone given
During dynamic navigation, an agent can face semantic conflicts in which one object displays different semantic features as observation views change.
“However, during the dynamic navigation, the agent could be trapped in some semantic conflicts, where the same object exhibits different semantic features due to variations in observation views.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
L-sTDE applies counterfactual causal inference to remove object layout mismatches between the current scene and prior knowledge, improving navigation policy generalization.
“In the context of embodied navigation, L-sTDE [67] utilizes causal inference based on counterfactual prediction to eliminate object layout discrepancies between the current scene and prior knowledge, enhancing the generalization of the navigation policy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] 67. Sixian Zhang, Xinhang Song, Weijie Li, Yubing Bai, Xinyao Yu, and Shuqiang Jiang. 2023. Layout-based causal inference for object navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 10792-10802. source
- Premisenone given
Visual representation learning from embodied scenes differs from learning from discrete images because the perception model must adapt to viewpoint changes to ensure stable feature learning from repeated views and accurate identification of novel observations.
“The key difference between visual representation learning from embodied scenes and discrete images is that the visual perception model must be adaptive to viewpoint changes, ensuring stable feature learning from repeated views and accurate identification of novel observations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If bed is unlikely and sofa likely given a cushion, learned features around the cushion tend to look bed-like, yielding biased visual representations.
“As for the visual representation learning, when ( = | = ℎ ) is small while ( = | = ℎ ) is large, the learned features around the cushion region tend to resemble bed-like features, resulting in biased visual representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A hand-crafted semantic distribution in an image dataset can create spurious observational associations between objects.
“However, the hand-crafted semantic distribution in the image dataset would introduce some spurious observational associations between objects and , e.g., if a cushion is more frequently observed with a bed than with a sofa, spurious object associations may cause the sofa under the cushion to be mistaken for a bed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Causal learning adjustment enables visual perception models to recognize true causal associations between objects within each static view.
“Through the adjustment of causal learning, the visual perception models have learned to recognize the true causal associations between objects in each static view.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
UEVR uses causal inference and cross-modality alignment to counter perception biases.
“we propose the Unbiased Embodied Visual Representation(UEVR), which overcomes the perception biases using causal inference and cross-modality alignment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The performance on ObjectNav demonstrates the ultimate goal of improving environment perception leading to superior navigation performance.
“The performance on the ObjectNav task then demonstrates our ultimate goal of improving the environment perception of the agent, leading to superior navigation performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The reason is that 3D points focus more on providing coarse geometric structures rather than fine-grained visual representations, hindering scene understanding.
“The reason is that 3D points focus more on providing coarse geometric structures rather than fine-grained visual representations, hindering the scene understanding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Causal-ObjectNav strategy results in unbiased action decisions by introducing visual confounders and a pre-trained visual perception model.
“To alleviate the negative illusion from the spurious associations between objects and semantic conflict due to the dynamic perspective changes, we introduce the visual confounders set and pre-trained visual perception model into the navigation strategy and propose the Causal-ObjectNav, resulting in unbiased action decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The qualitative results demonstrate that UEVR is effective in avoiding navigation failures caused by semantic errors.
“Intuitive qualitative results demonstrate the effectiveness of the UEVR in avoiding navigation failures caused by semantic errors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Additional causal-objective pre-training of the visual backbone remains indispensable.
“Additional causal-objective pre-training of the visual backbone remains indispensable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
That misclassification was caused by the spurious object associations discovered by the authors.
“which is caused by our discovered spurious object associations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Accurate identification of visual confounders is another critical factor that affects the effectiveness of our navigation strategy.
“Furthermore, accurate identification of visual confounders is another critical factor that affects the effectiveness of our navigation strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The significant improvements demonstrate that integration with 3D geometric features enhances perception accuracy of the visual backbone more efficiently than supervised, 2D self-supervised, and embodied training methods.
“The significant improvements demonstrate that the integration with 3D geometric features enhances the perception accuracy of the visual backbone more efficiently compared to the supervised, 2D self-supervised, and embodied training methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The proposed approach serves only as a moderate correction for a constrained set of task-relevant objects.
“our proposed approach serves only as a moderate correction for a constrained set of task-relevant objects”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
ResNet50 trained from scratch would achieve a better balance between visual perception fine-tuning and fusion with visual confounder features, resulting in more flexible environmental adaptability.
“The ResNet50 trained from scratch would achieve a better balance between visual perception fine-tuning and fusion with visual confounder features, resulting in more flexible environmental adaptability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Self-supervised cross-modality alignment enhances the agent's embodied perception capability by embedding 3D geometric consistency into the 2D visual features.
“we utilize the self-supervised cross-modality alignment to enhance the agent's embodied perception capability by embedding 3D geometric consistency into the 2D visual features”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The result indicates that unbiased visual confounder learning enables precise visual representation learning.
“The result indicates the process of unbiased visual confounder learning enables precise visual representation learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The first two downstream tasks (ObjDet and InstSeg) corroborate improved object recognition capability brought by the pretraining mechanism.
“The first two are utilized to intuitively corroborate the improved object recognition capability brought by the pretraining mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Semantic errors in navigation can be attributed not only to segmentation model performance but also to the inability of visual features to adapt to dynamic embodied navigation processes.
“This semantic error can be attributed not only to the performance of the segmentation model but also to the inability of the visual features to adapt to dynamic embodied navigation processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
UEVR utilizes back-door causal intervention and cross-modality contrastive learning with GeoCon to tackle the negative impact of scene distribution bias and dynamic-view changes.
“which utilizes the back-door causal intervention and cross-modality contrastive learning mechanism with GeoCon to tackle the negative impact of the scene distribution bias and dynamic-view changes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The precise estimation of causal associations among task-relevant objects supports the generalization of our strategy.
“Although our proposed UEVR lacks the extensive world knowledge of LLMs, the precise estimation of the causal associations among the task-relevant objects also supports the generalization of our strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The proposed method eliminates perception bias caused by spurious object associations and frequent perspective changes through causal inference and 2D-3D cross-modality alignment.
“In this paper, we eliminate the perception bias caused by spurious object associations and frequent perspective changes through causal inference and 2D-3D cross-modality alignment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Employing causal inference and 2D-3D cross-modality alignment eliminates visual representation bias from spurious object associations and frequent perspective changes, improving recognition accuracy of the visual perception module.
“Our core insight is that employing causal inference and 2D-3D cross-modality alignment eliminates the visual representation bias of spurious object associations and frequent perspective changes, further improving the recognition accuracy of the visual perception module.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The backdoor intervention cuts the spurious correlation caused by the confounder that existed in the task scenes.
“we exploit the backdoor intervention to cut the spurious correlation caused by the confounder that existed in the task scenes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The results indicate that UEVR is critical for the navigation framework.
“The results indicate that our proposed UEVR is critical for the navigation framework.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The longer-range spatial and semantic prior of M3 is beneficial for more comprehensive global exploration.
“which is beneficial for more comprehensive global exploration”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Sufficient experimental results demonstrate superior performance of Causal-ObjectNav, which integrates UEVR with cross-modality navigation strategy.
“Sufficient experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed Causal-ObjectNav, which integrates UEVR with the cross-modality navigation strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lowest results of ResNet50 from scratch demonstrate limitations of a single training objective including object detection or instance segmentation.
“which demonstrates the limitations of the single training objective including object detection or instance segmentation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The results indicate that causal adjustment is still indispensable in embodied navigation.
“The results indicate that causal adjustment is still indispensable in embodied navigation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
- May combine two claims. 38
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCONTA attributes ambiguous segmentation boundaries to confounding context and removes the spurious association using backdoor intervention.
“CONTA [63] attributes the cause of the ambiguous boundaries of segmentation to the confounding context and clears this spurious association through the backdoor intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] 63. Dong Zhang, Hanwang Zhang, Jinhui Tang, Xian-Sheng Hua, and Qianru Sun. 2020. Causal intervention for weakly-supervised semantic segmentation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 655-666. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLopez et al. first identified causal dispositions among semantic categories in hand-crafted datasets and proposed observational causal discovery.
“Lopez et al. [36] first reveal the causal dispositions of the semantic categories in the hand-crafted dataset, which could affect each other's existence, and propose the observational causal discovery technique.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lopez et al. [36] 36. David Lopez-Paz, Robert Nishihara, Soumith Chintala, Bernhard Scholkopf, and Léon Bottou. 2017. Discovering causal signals in images. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 6979-6987. source
Section 1.1 describes causal dispositions between object categories that affect whether other objects are present, and Section 2 describes the authors’ observational causal-discovery classifier. But Section 4.1 says the image analysis used MSCOCO images and Pascal VOC categories, not hand-crafted image datasets. The paper proposes a classifier for observational causal discovery; it does not claim to have originated observational causal discovery itself. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataExperiments on MP3D and HM3D show that Causal-ObjectNav achieves state-of-the-art performance and strong generalization.
“Extensive experiments on the Matterport3D(MP3D) and Habitat-Matterport3D(HM3D) [46] datasets demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance and the excellent generalization capability of the proposed Causal-ObjectNav.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] 46. Santhosh Kumar Ramakrishnan, Aaron Gokaslan, Erik Wijmans, Oleksandr Maksymets, Alexander Clegg, John M Turner, Eric Undersander, Wojciech Galuba, Andrew Westbury, Angel X Chang, Manolis Savva, Yili Zhao, and Dhruv Batra. 2021. Habitat-Matterport 3D Dataset (HM3D): 1000 Large-scale 3D Environments for Embodied AI. In Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08238 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationBackdoor intervention uses a do-operator to sever the dependency between a source object and context objects that are treated as potential confounders.
“The backdoor intervention utilizes a do-operator to disrupt the dependency between the source object and other context objects , which are considered the potential confounders affecting the association assessment between the object and .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Wang et al. [54] 54. Tan Wang, Jianqiang Huang, Hanwang Zhang, and Qianru Sun. 2020. Visual commonsense r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 10760-10770. source
- cites [42] 42. Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie. 2018. The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. Basic books.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPerception models pre-trained on offline image datasets have a large domain gap and struggle with perception obstacles from rapid viewpoint changes.
“Common perception models pre-trained on offline image datasets exhibit a significant domain gap and struggle to adapt to perception obstacles due to rapid changes in viewing perspectives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Devendra Singh Chaplot, Murtaza Dalal, Saurabh Gupta, Jitendra Malik, and Russ R Salakhutdinov. 2021. Seal: Self-supervised embodied active learning using exploration and 3d consistency. Advances in neural information processing systems 34 (2021), 13086-13098. source
The Introduction (p. 1) contrasts sparse Internet images with the continuous, changing views an embodied agent encounters, and the Method (p. 3) starts with a model pretrained on static Internet data. The paper supports the need to adapt that model to embodied perception, but it does not specifically attribute perception difficulties to rapid viewpoint changes or establish that the domain gap is significant. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [40] 40. So Yeon Min, Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai, Wei Ding, Ali Farhadi, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Yonatan Bisk, and Jian Zhang. 2023. Self-supervised object goal navigation with in-situ finetuning. In 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 7119-7126. source
The Real-World Experiments section identifies visual-perception generalization failures as a major ObjectNav error mode, and the Location Consistency section describes fine-tuning a pre-trained segmentation model using images from disparate views (page numbers unavailable in our copy). The paper does not establish that a large gap specifically arises from offline image pre-training or that rapid viewpoint changes cause the reported failures. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataExperiments on multiple downstream tasks with MP3D show significant gains from UEVR and Causal-ObjectNav, and HM3D results indicate generalization.
“Extensive experiments on diverse downstream tasks using the MP3D dataset demonstrate the significant improvement achieved by our proposed UEVR and Causal-ObjectNav, while results on the HM3D dataset further highlight the generalization capability of our method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataConditional probabilities differ substantially before and after backdoor intervention; for example, the causal probability from sink to toilet rises while that from sink to chair falls.
“As illustrated in Fig. 4, there are significant differences in the conditional probability before and after the backdoor intervention.For instance, the causal probability of → increases while → ℎ decreases after the intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur method relies on UEVR and explicit 3D geometric priors for target discrimination and improves 3.4% SR and 0.6% SPL compared to Stubborn.
“Our method relies on the UEVR and explicit 3D geometric priors for target discrimination and improves 3.4% SR and 0.6% SPL compared to Stubborn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur method outperforms all baselines on both ObjDet and InstSeg tasks.
“Our method outperforms all baselines on both ObjDet and InstSeg tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur Causal-ObjectNav outperforms 3D-Aware by 1.2% SR and 0.5% SPL absolutely.
“Finally, our Causal-ObjectNav outperforms 1.2% SR and 0.5% SPL absolutely compared to the 3D-Aware, which also attempts to exploit the 3D geometric information for object goal navigation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataOur Causal-ObjectNav strategy achieves the highest navigation SR of 43.6% without any fine-tuning on HM3D.
“The comparative results in Table 8 support our claim, where our Causal-ObjectNav strategy achieves the highest navigation SR of 43.6% without any fine-tuning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSupervised and SimCLR ResNet50 improve AP50 scores by 7.89/6.64 (TrainSplit) and 3.19/1.21 (TestSplit) absolutely on ObjDet relative to training from scratch.
“The Supervised and SimCLR ResNet50 improve the AP50 scores by 7.89/6.64(TrainSplit) and 3.19/1.21(TestSplit) absolutely on the ObjDet task relative to the one trained from scratch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataResNet50 pre-trained by CMA contrastive learning achieves the best performance in both SR and SPL metrics, demonstrating effectiveness of pre-training mechanism in UEVR learning.
“As shown in Table 5, the ResNet50 pre-trained by our proposed CMA contrastive learning achieves the best performance in both SR and SPL metrics, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the pre-training mechanism in UEVR learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the bed-target example, the agent located the correct bed and successfully finished the navigation task at timestep 342.
“Finally, the agent locates the correct bed and successfully finishes the navigation task at the timestep = 342.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAlthough the causal adjustment module effectively estimates commonsense associations among task-relevant objects, the BICA module and visual confounder set exhibit suboptimal performance when applied to a non-aligned framework.
“Although the causal adjustment module effectively estimates the commonsense associations among task-relevant objects, the BICA module and the visual confounder set exhibit suboptimal performance when applied to a non-aligned framework.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThree key components contribute to our performance: the 2D visual perception model, the 3D scene representation module, and the biased adjustment module BICA.
“Three key components contribute to our performance, including the 2D visual perception model 2 , the 3D scene representation module 3 , and the biased adjustment module BICA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCRL and ALP achieve competitive performance compared to baselines trained on offline image datasets, and ALP archives suboptimal results on both object detection and instance segmentation tasks.
“They achieve competitive performance compared to the baselines trained on the offline image datasets, and ALP archives the suboptimal results on both object detection and instance segmentation tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCompared to Red-Rabbit, our method achieves the same SR but improves SPL by an absolute 6.2%.
“Compared to the optimal end-to-end navigation policy Red-Rabbit, our method achieves the same SR but improves the SPL by an absolute 6.2%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenL2M achieves the best performance improvements among SSCNav, L2M, and PONI, while our method yields absolute gains of 2.5% and 3.1% in SR and SPL.
“L2M achieves the best performance improvements among the three methods, while our method yields absolute gains of 2.5% and 3.1% in terms of SR and SPL.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn that sofa-target example, the object discrimination module judged the current semantic segmentation results to be reliable.
“the object discrimination module considers the current semantic segmentation results to be reliable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhile ResNet50 initialized from ImageNet pre-trained weights performs better on vision tasks compared to training from scratch, the results are reversed on object navigation task.
“Another noteworthy finding is that while the ResNet50 initialized from the ImageNet pre-trained weights performs better on vision tasks compared to training from scratch, the results are indeed reversed on the object navigation task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur method improves AP50 scores by 2.39/0.56 (TrainSplit) and 1.33/0.63 (TestSplit) absolutely compared to ImageNet-Supervised and ALP on ObjDet.
“Our method improves the AP50 scores by 2.39/0.56(TrainSplit) and 1.33/0.63(TestSplit) absolutely compared to the ImageNet-Supervised and ALP on the ObjDet task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe post-intervention trend matches common sense: sinks and toilets often co-occur in restrooms, whereas sinks and chairs occasionally co-occur in open kitchens.
“This divergent trend aligns with common sense knowledge, i.e., the sink and toilet are often found together in restrooms, while sink and chair are occasionally found in some open kitchens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenUnbiased representation learning depends on commonsense knowledge already recorded in discourse.
“The unbiased representation learning relies on the commonsense knowledge that has already been recorded in discourse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningVisual features of images from different perspectives have high similarity not only in location consistency but also reflect the same 3D geometric structure.
“The GeoCon indicates that the visual features of 1 and 2 have high similarity not only in the location consistency but also reflect the same 3D geometric structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Multi-view observations implicitly correspond to the same solid geometric structure (GeoCon).
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPrevailing ObjectNav methods overemphasize hand-crafted scene representations and neglect how perception bias in visual observations affects navigation.
“However, excessive attention to the hand-crafted scene representation in prevailing approaches leads to the neglect of the negative influence of the perception bias hidden in the visual observations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCausal-ObjectNav combines UEVR with 2D-3D scene representation for exploration and target discrimination, yielding an unbiased and efficient navigation strategy.
“We design the Causal-ObjectNav that incorporates the UEVR with the 2D-3D modality scene representation for scene exploration and target discrimination, leading to an unbiased and efficient navigational strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUEVR removes inherent semantic distribution bias and perspective-change perception conflict via causal inference and cross-modal alignment, respectively.
“The UEVR eliminates the inherent semantic distribution bias and perception conflict due to perspective changes through causal inference and cross-modal alignment, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBackdoor intervention uses a do-operator to cut the confounder-to-object shortcut and control for potential confounders.
“To mitigate the negative impact of the spurious associations, the backdoor intervention is utilized to cut off the shortcut ← → with the -operator, which is a hypothetical intervention on the variables to control for potential confounders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] 42. Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie. 2018. The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. Basic books.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOnce an image is captured, the causal associations underlying the contextual arrangement of objects are no longer accessible.
“However, the causal associations behind the contextual arrangement of objects are no longer accessible after the image has been taken.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe backdoor intervention lets UC R-CNN account for all prior confounders, even absent ones, enabling investigation of truly causal associations and extraction of unbiased object features.
“In the context-label prediction task, the backdoor intervention mechanism enables the UC R-CNN to account for all prior confounders, including those not present in the context.This enables the investigation of the truly causal associations, rather than the passive observation associations, thereby promoting the extraction of unbiased object features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Visual causal confounders can be represented by average object features and their corresponding probability distribution.
- The authors state this as an assumption: A fixed set of semantic categories from the scene dataset adequately approximates all real-world confounders.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCross-modality learning allows 2D and 3D features to enrich each other iteratively.
“The aforementioned methods have demonstrated that the 2D and 3D features are iteratively enriched by each other through cross-modality learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningManaging each confounder's feature and probability allows calculation of true inter-object causal associations and extraction of unbiased visual representations.
“If we can manage the feature of each confounder and its corresponding probability ( ), we can calculate the true causal association between objects and further extract unbiased visual representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Visual causal confounders can be represented by average object features and their corresponding probability distribution.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSemantic conflict bias arises from dynamic perspective changes.
“the semantic conflict bias arises due to the dynamic perspective changes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe unbiased visual representation recognizes what different objects are semantically and directs the agent to the correct target.
“The unbiased visual representation clearly recognizes the semantic attributes of different objects and guides the agent to navigate to the right target.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningA collaborative update mechanism dynamically refines extracted visual confounders during training, and the visual backbone of UC R-CNN is optimized step by step to extract confounder features without bias.
“Moreover, a collaborative update mechanism dynamically refines the extracted visual confounders during training, while the visual backbone in UC R-CNN is progressively optimized to extract unbiased confounder features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe unbiased causal inference mechanism further enhances precise scene understanding and object identification compared to using 3D visual features alone, while CMA pre-training enhances the 2D visual backbone with spatial awareness and enables more effective fusion with explicit 3D visual features.
“The unbiased causal inference mechanism further enhances precise scene understanding and object identification compared to using 3D visual features alone, while the pre-training process of CMA enhances the 2D visual backbone with spatial awareness and enables more effective fusion with explicit 3D visual features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe LocCon exploits high similarity of 2D features between multi-view images to enhance representation learning but overlooks 3D geometric structure information.
“The LocCon exploits the high similarity of 2D features between multi-view images to enhance the representation learning, but still overlooks the information about 3D geometric structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Images captured from multiple views of the same space naturally exhibit high similarity (LocCon).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe limited confounders may exhibit suboptimal performance when handling novel targets.
“Consequently, we adopt the same segmentation model in the HM3D scenes, which implies that the limited confounders may exhibit suboptimal performance when handling novel targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe visual backbone indirectly learns precise object features during the process of learning unbiased visual confounder sets with UC R-CNN.
“It is worth noting that though the UC R-CNN is used to learn the unbiased visual confounder sets, we think the visual backbone also indirectly learns the precise object feature in this process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningFine-grained 3D perception is indispensable and plays a crucial role in improving visual perception accuracy for ObjectNav agents.
“Since the ObjectNav agent is required to finish the task in 3D meshes, fine-grained 3D perception is indispensable and plays a crucial role in improving visual perception accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results show that all components within Causal-ObjectNav can boost evaluation metrics, where unbiased embodied visual representation for object discrimination plays a more critical role in performance enhancement.
“The results show that all components within Causal-ObjectNav can boost the evaluation metrics, where the unbiased embodied visual representation for object discrimination plays a more critical role in performance enhancement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThis performance improvement indicates the rationale that some navigation policies adopt ResNet pre-trained on ImageNet as visual backbone.
“This performance improvement indicates the rationale that some navigation policies adopt the ResNet pre-trained on ImageNet as the visual backbone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis result can be attributed to the object discrimination module empowered by UEVR, which enhances target recognition accuracy and planning efficiency on the semantic map.
“This result can be attributed to the object discrimination module empowered by the proposed UEVR, which enhances target recognition accuracy and planning efficiency on the semantic map.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe reason is that causal inference in embodied navigation is the dynamic fusion process between visual perception features and visual confounder sets.
“The reason is that the causal inference in embodied navigation is the dynamic fusion process between visual perception features and visual confounder sets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIntegration of both training objectives brings the most salient improvement for the visual perception model, indicating that unbiased 2D visual features are beneficial for cross-modality contrastive learning.
“The integration of both training objectives brings the most salient improvement for the visual perception model, which indicates that unbiased 2D visual features are also beneficial for cross-modality contrastive learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe HM3D dataset contains only 6 target objects, all included in the predefined 21 confounders.
“Moreover, it is important to note that the HM3D dataset contains only 6 target objects, all of which are included in the predefined = 21 confounders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSuch improvements demonstrate that unbiased embodied visual representation mitigates negative effects of semantic errors to a certain extent, while fine-grained 3D geometric priors are more effective in object identification.
“Such improvements demonstrate that the unbiased embodied visual representation mitigates the negative effects of semantic errors to a certain extent, while the fine-grained 3D geometric priors are more effective in object identification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe role of semantic maps lies in target object localization and scene exploration.
“It's worth considering that the role of semantic maps lies in target object localization and scene exploration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis result highlights the importance of the training objective based on causal inference, which captures causal associations among contextual objects and enables unbiased confounder identification.
“This result highlights the importance of the training objective based on causal inference, which captures causal associations among contextual objects and enables unbiased confounder identification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Visual causal confounders can be represented by average object features and their corresponding probability distribution.
“To quantitatively estimate semantic distribution bias, we define the average object features and corresponding probability distribution as the visual causal confounders.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A fixed set of semantic categories from the scene dataset adequately approximates all real-world confounders.
“For the confounder set , we can't collect all confounders in the real world.Therefore, we approximate it to a fixed confounder set = [ 1 , 2 , • • • , ] where is the semantic categories in the scene dataset( = 21 in MP3D scenes):”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Multi-view observations implicitly correspond to the same solid geometric structure (GeoCon).
“The GeoCon means that the multi-view observations implicitly correspond to the same solid geometric structure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Images captured from multiple views of the same space naturally exhibit high similarity (LocCon).
“The LocCon suggests that images captured from multiple views of the same space naturally exhibit high similarity.”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More details of the navigation agent and visualization analysis of pre-collected data are in the supplementary material.”
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137 · see citing works
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,989 · see citing works
A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05709 · Cited by 10,857 · see citing works
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625 · see citing works
Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive LearningPreprint
Chen, X., Fan, H., Girshick, R., & He, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.04297 · Cited by 2,579 · see citing works
Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environments
Chang, A., Dai, A., Funkhouser, T., Halber, M., Niebner, M., Savva, M., Song, S., Zeng, A., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · 2017 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2017.00081 · Cited by 1,858 · see citing works
A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration
Yamauchi, B. (2002) · Proceedings 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation CIRA'97. 'Towards New Computational Principles for Robotics and Automation' · doi:10.1109/cira.1997.613851 · Cited by 1,695 · see citing works
Sethian, J. A. (1999) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144598347059 · Cited by 1,610 · see citing works
Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Research
Savva, M., Kadian, A., Maksymets, O., Zhao, Y., Wijmans, E., Jain, B., Straub, J., Liu, J., Koltun, V., Malik, J., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00943 · Cited by 1,237 · see citing works
On evaluation of embodied navigation agents
(2018) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06757 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Cross-Modal Causal Relational Reasoning for Event-Level Visual Question Answering
Liu, Y., Li, G., & Lin, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3284038 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Causal Intervention for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation
Zhang, D., Zhang, H., Tang, J., Hua, X., & Sun, Q. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.12547 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor EnvironmentsPreprint
Chang, A., Dai, A., Funkhouser, T. A., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.06158 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Object Goal Navigation using Goal-Oriented Semantic Exploration
Chaplot, D. S., Gandhi, D., Gupta, A., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.00643 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
CrossPoint: Self-Supervised Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning for 3D Point Cloud Understanding
Afham, M., Dissanayake, I., Dissanayake, D., Dharmasiri, A., Thilakarathna, K., & Rodrigo, R. P. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00967 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Wang, T., Huang, J., Zhang, H., & Sun, Q. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01077 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Discovering Causal Signals in Images
Lopez-Paz, D., Nishihara, R., Chintala, S., Schölkopf, B., & Bottou, L. (2016) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.08179 · Cited by 259
DD-PPO: Learning Near-Perfect PointGoal Navigators from 2.5 Billion FramesPreprint
Wijmans, E., Kadian, A., Morcos, A. S., Lee, S., Essa, I. A., Parikh, D., Savva, M., & Batra, D. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.00357 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Neural Topological SLAM for Visual Navigation
Singh Chaplot, D., Salakhutdinov, R., Gupta, A., & Gupta, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01289 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
RedNet: Residual Encoder-Decoder Network for indoor RGB-D Semantic SegmentationPreprint
Jiang, J., Zheng, L., Luo, F., & Zhang, Z. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.01054 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Discovering Causal Signals in Images
Lopez-Paz, D., Nishihara, R., Chintala, S., Scholkopf, B., & Bottou, L. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.14 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
CLIP2Scene: Towards Label-efficient 3D Scene Understanding by CLIP
Chen, R., Liu, Y., Kong, L., Zhu, X., Ma, Y., Li, Y., Hou, Y., Qiao, Y., & Wang, W. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00678 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
PONI: Potential Functions for ObjectGoal Navigation with Interaction-free Learning
Ramakrishnan, S. K., Chaplot, D. S., Al-Halah, Z., Malik, J., & Grauman, K. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01832 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Two Causal Principles for Improving Visual Dialog
Qi, J., Niu, Y., Huang, J., & Zhang, H. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01087 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Deconfounded Image Captioning: A Causal Retrospect
Yang, X., Zhang, H., & Cai, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3121705 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Navigating to objects in the real world
Gervet, T., Chintala, S., Batra, D., Malik, J., & Chaplot, D. S. (2023) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adf6991 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Bidirectional Projection Network for Cross Dimension Scene Understanding
Hu, W., Zhao, H., Jiang, L., Jia, J., & Wong, T. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01414 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Learning to Map for Active Semantic Goal NavigationPreprint
Georgakis, G., Bucher, B., Schmeckpeper, K., Singh, S., & Daniilidis, K. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.15648 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Habitat-Matterport 3D Dataset (HM3D): 1000 Large-scale 3D Environments for Embodied AI
Ramakrishnan, S. K., Gokaslan, A., Wijmans, E., Maksymets, O., Clegg, A., Turner, J., Undersander, E., Galuba, W., Westbury, A., Chang, A. X., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.08238 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Topological Semantic Graph Memory for Image-Goal Navigation
Kim, N., Kwon, O., Yoo, H., Choi, Y.-H., Park, J., & Oh, S. (2022) · Conference on Robot Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.08274 · Cited by 106
ZSON: Zero-Shot Object-Goal Navigation Using Multimodal Goal Embeddings
Majumdar, A., Aggarwal, G., Devnani, B., Hoffman, J., & Batra, D. (2022) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/068431-2343 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Hierarchical Object-to-Zone Graph for Object Navigation
Zhang, S., Song, X., Bai, Y., Li, W., Chu, Y., & Jiang, S. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01485 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Habitat-Web: Learning Embodied Object-Search Strategies from Human Demonstrations at Scale
Ramrakhya, R., Undersander, E., Batra, D., & Das, A. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00511 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Show, Deconfound and Tell: Image Captioning with Causal Inference
Liu, B., Wang, D., Yang, X., Zhou, Y. Z., Yao, R., Shao, Z., & Zhao, J. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01751 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Fusion-Aware Point Convolution for Online Semantic 3D Scene Segmentation
Zhang, J., Zhu, C., Zheng, L., & Xu, K. (2020) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00459 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
SSCNav: Confidence-Aware Semantic Scene Completion for Visual Semantic Navigation
Liang, Y., Chen, B., & Song, S. (2021) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9560925 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationTHDA: Treasure Hunt Data Augmentation for Semantic Navigation
Maksymets, O., Cartillier, V., Gokaslan, A., Wijmans, E., Galuba, W., Lee, S., & Batra, D. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01509 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Bridging Zero-shot Object Navigation and Foundation Models through Pixel-Guided Navigation Skill
Cai, W., Huang, S., Cheng, G., Long, Y., Gao, P., Sun, C., & Dong, H. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610499 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Pri3D: Can 3D Priors Help 2D Representation Learning?
Hou, J., Xie, S., Graham, B., Dai, A., & Nießner, M. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00564 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
3D-to-2D Distillation for Indoor Scene Parsing
Liu, Z., Qi, X., & Fu, C. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00444 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
3D-Aware Object Goal Navigation via Simultaneous Exploration and Identification
Zhang, J., Liu, D., Meng, F., Fan, Q., Chen, X., Xu, K., & Wang, H. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00645 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Stubborn: A Strong Baseline for Indoor Object Navigation
Luo, H., Yue, A., Hong, Z.-W., & Agrawal, P. (2022) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros47612.2022.9981646 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Learning Navigational Visual Representations with Semantic Map Supervision
Hong, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, R., Dernoncourt, F., Bui, T., Gould, S., & Tan, H. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00284 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
ZSON: Zero-Shot Object-Goal Navigation using Multimodal Goal EmbeddingsPreprint
Majumdar, A., Aggarwal, G., Devnani, B., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.12403 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Layout-based Causal Inference for Object Navigation
Zhang, S., Song, X., Li, W., Bai, Y., Yu, X., & Jiang, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01039 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
ESC: Exploration with Soft Commonsense Constraints for Zero-shot Object NavigationPreprint
Zhou, K., Zheng, K., Pryor, C., Shen, Y., Jin, H., Getoor, L. C., & Wang, X. E. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.13166 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
PEANUT: Predicting and Navigating to Unseen Targets
Zhai, A. J., & Wang, S. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01003 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Curious Representation Learning for Embodied Intelligence
Du, Y., Gan, C., & Isola, P. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01024 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Agent-Centric Relation Graph for Object Visual Navigation
Hu, X., Lin, Y., Wang, S., Wu, Z., & Lv, K. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2023.3291131 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
CaMIL: Causal Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Classification
Chen, K., Sun, S., & Zhao, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27873 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Imagine Before Go: Self-Supervised Generative Map for Object Goal Navigation
Zhang, S., Yu, X., Song, X., Wang, X., & Jiang, S. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01553 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Learning Heterogeneous Relation Graph and Value Regularization Policy for Visual Navigation
Zhou, K., Guo, C., Guo, W., & Zhang, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3300888 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
GOAT-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Lifelong Navigation
Khanna, M., Ramrakhya, R., Chhablani, G., Yenamandra, S., Gervet, T., Chang, M., Kira, Z., Chaplot, D. S., Batra, D., & Mottaghi, R. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01549 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Mask3D: Pretraining 2D Vision Transformers by Learning Masked 3D Priors
Hou, J., Dai, X., He, Z., Dai, A., & NieBner, M. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01298 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Learning 3D Scene Priors with 2D Supervision
Nie, Y., Dai, A., Han, X., & NieBner, M. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00083 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
SEAL: Self-supervised embodied active learning using exploration and 3D consistency
Chaplot, D. S., Dalal, M., Gupta, S., Malik, J., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.01001 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Chen, B., Kang, J., Zhong, P., Cui, Y., Lu, S., Liang, Y., & Wang, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2023.3324380 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationObject Goal Navigation with Recursive Implicit Maps
Chen, S., Chabal, T., Ivan Laptev, A., & Schmid, C. (2023) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros55552.2023.10341827 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
CausalPC: Improving the Robustness of Point Cloud Classification by Causal Effect Identification
Huang, Y., Zhang, M., Ding, D., Jiang, E., Wang, Z., & Yang, M. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01870 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Prioritized Semantic Learning for Zero-Shot Instance Navigation
Sun, X., Liu, L., Zhi, H., Qiu, R., & Liang, J. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73254-6_10 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Knowledge-Aware Causal Inference Network for Visual Dialog
Zhang, Z., Ji, Y., & Liu, C. (2023) · International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3591106.3592272 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Building Category Graphs Representation with Spatial and Temporal Attention for Visual Navigation
Hu, X., Lin, Y., Fan, H., Wang, S., Wu, Z., & Lv, K. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3653714 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Fusion-Aware Point Convolution for Online Semantic 3D Scene SegmentationPreprint
Zhang, J., Zhu, C., Zheng, L., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.06233 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
(2023) · doi:10.1109/iros55552.2023.10341959 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Janda, A., Wagstaff, B., Ng, E. G., & Kelly, J. (2023) · Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision · doi:10.1109/crv60082.2023.00026 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Point Cloud Completion Guided by Prior Knowledge via Causal InferencePreprint
Gao, S., Jiao, C., Chen, R., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17770
ALP: Action-Aware Embodied Learning for PerceptionPreprint
Liang, X., Han, A., Yan, W., Raghunathan, A., & Abbeel, P. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.10190
Causality-based Cross-Modal Representation Learning for Vision-and-Language NavigationPreprint
Wang, L., He, Z., Dang, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.03405
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie. 2018. The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. Basic Books.
- Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J. Guibas. 2017. PointNet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 30.
- Pengying Wu, Yao Mu, Bingxian Wu, Yi Hou, Ji Ma, Shanghang Zhang, and Chang Liu. 2024. VoroNav: Voronoi-based zero-shot object navigation with large language model. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, 53737–53775.
- Kelvin Xu, Jimmy Ba, Ryan Kiros, Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron Courville, Ruslan Salakhudinov, Rich Zemel, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning. Francis Bach and David Blei (Eds.), Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 37, PMLR, 2048–2057. Retrieved from https://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/xuc15.html
- Karmesh Yadav, Ram Ramrakhya, Arjun Majumdar, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Sachit Kuhar, Dhruv Batra, Alexei Baevski, and Oleksandr Maksymets. 2023. Offline visual representation learning for embodied navigation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Reincarnating Reinforcement Learning at ICLR 2023.
- Authors
- Kang, J., Chen, B., Zhong, P., Wang, Y., Yang, H., & Sheng, Y.
- Affiliations
- Central South University (CN)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
- Published
- 2025-11-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1551-6857 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-6865
- OpenAlex
- W4413105302
- Semantic Scholar
- 095ccdcf00bde32760241f143bf4c2eeb8b11173
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62272489)
- Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (2022JJ30760)
- High-Performance Computing Center of Central South University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Keywords
- object-goal navigation, perceptual bias, causal inference, cross-modal alignment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-01.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-01.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review