Object Goal Navigation using Goal-Oriented Semantic Exploration
Open accessAbstract
This work studies the problem of object goal navigation which involves navigating to an instance of the given object category in unseen environments. End-to-end learning-based navigation methods struggle at this task as they are ineffective at exploration and long-term planning. We propose a modular system called, `Goal-Oriented Semantic Exploration' which builds an episodic semantic map and uses it to explore the environment efficiently based on the goal object category. Empirical results in visually realistic simulation environments show that the proposed model outperforms a wide range of baselines including end-to-end learning-based methods as well as modular map-based methods and led to the winning entry of the CVPR-2020 Habitat ObjectNav Challenge. Ablation analysis indicates that the proposed model learns semantic priors of the relative arrangement of objects in a scene, and uses them to explore efficiently. Domain-agnostic module design allow us to transfer our model to a mobile robot platform and achieve similar performance for object goal navigation in the real-world.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most existing methods process observations in a reactive and stateless manner.
“Most existing methods, whether based on end-to-end reinforcement learning18–20 or modular pipelines with powerful MLLMs21,22, process observations in a reactive and stateless manner.”
From Brain-inspired spatial intelligence for embodied agents (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
The Introduction (p. 1) describes end-to-end methods that use recurrent networks to build episodic memory and a modular system that maintains memory with explicit maps—contrary to calling these methods stateless. The paper does not address MLLM-based pipelines. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939 · see citing works
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625 · see citing works
Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces
Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.508439 · Cited by 6,343 · see citing works
Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environments
Chang, A., Dai, A., Funkhouser, T., Halber, M., Niebner, M., Savva, M., Song, S., Zeng, A., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · 2017 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2017.00081 · Cited by 1,858 · see citing works
A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration
Yamauchi, B. (2002) · Proceedings 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation CIRA'97. 'Towards New Computational Principles for Robotics and Automation' · doi:10.1109/cira.1997.613851 · Cited by 1,695 · see citing works
Neural Map: Structured Memory for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Parisotto, E., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.08360 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationSemantic Curiosity for Active Visual Learning
Chaplot, D. S., Jiang, H., Gupta, S., & Gupta, A. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58539-6_19 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- [1][1] Peter Anderson, Angel Chang, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Saurabh Gupta, Vladlen Koltun, Jana Kosecka, Jitendra Malik, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Manolis Savva, et al. On evaluation of embodied navigation agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06757 , 2018. - · arXiv
- [2][2] Iro Armeni, Zhi-Yang He, JunYoung Gwak, Amir R Zamir, Martin Fischer, Jitendra Malik, and Silvio Savarese. 3d scene graph: A structure for unified semantics, 3d space, and camera. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 5664-5673, 2019. -
- [3][3] Sean L Bowman, Nikolay Atanasov, Kostas Daniilidis, and George J Pappas. Probabilistic data association for semantic slam. In 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) , pages 1722-1729. IEEE, 2017. -
- [4][4] John Canny. The complexity of robot motion planning . MIT press, 1988. -
- [6][6] Devendra Singh Chaplot and Guillaume Lample. Arnold: An autonomous agent to play fps games. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2017. -
- [7][7] Devendra Singh Chaplot, Kanthashree Mysore Sathyendra, Rama Kumar Pasumarthi, Dheeraj Rajagopal, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Gated-attention architectures for task-oriented language grounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.07230 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [8][8] Devendra Singh Chaplot, Emilio Parisotto, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Active neural localization. ICLR , 2018. -
- [9][9] Devendra Singh Chaplot, Dhiraj Gandhi, Saurabh Gupta, Abhinav Gupta, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Learning to explore using active neural slam. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2020. -
- [11][11] Devendra Singh Chaplot, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Abhinav Gupta, and Saurabh Gupta. Neural topological slam for visual navigation. In CVPR , 2020. -
- [12][12] Liang-Chieh Chen, George Papandreou, Florian Schroff, and Hartwig Adam. Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05587 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [13][13] J. Fuentes-Pacheco, J. Ruiz-Ascencio, and J. M. Rendón-Mancha. Visual simultaneous localization and mapping: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review , 2015. -
- [14][14] Clément Godard, Oisin Mac Aodha, and Gabriel J Brostow. Unsupervised monocular depth estimation with left-right consistency. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 270-279, 2017. -
- [15][15] Daniel Gordon, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Mohammad Rastegari, Joseph Redmon, Dieter Fox, and Ali Farhadi. Iqa: Visual question answering in interactive environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4089-4098, 2018. -
- [16][16] Saurabh Gupta, James Davidson, Sergey Levine, Rahul Sukthankar, and Jitendra Malik. Cognitive mapping and planning for visual navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 2616-2625, 2017. -
- [17][17] K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick. Mask r-cnn. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pages 2980-2988, 2017. -
- [19][19] Joao F Henriques and Andrea Vedaldi. Mapnet: An allocentric spatial memory for mapping environments. In proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 8476-8484, 2018. -
- [20][20] Peter Henry, Michael Krainin, Evan Herbst, Xiaofeng Ren, and Dieter Fox. Rgb-d mapping: Using depth cameras for dense 3d modeling of indoor environments. In Experimental robotics , pages 477-491. Springer, 2014. -
- [21][21] Karl Moritz Hermann, Felix Hill, Simon Green, Fumin Wang, Ryan Faulkner, Hubert Soyer, David Szepesvari, Wojtek Czarnecki, Max Jaderberg, Denis Teplyashin, et al. Grounded language learning in a simulated 3d world. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06551 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [22][22] Shahram Izadi, David Kim, Otmar Hilliges, David Molyneaux, Richard Newcombe, Pushmeet Kohli, Jamie Shotton, Steve Hodges, Dustin Freeman, Andrew Davison, and Andrew Fitzgibbon. KinectFusion: real-time 3D reconstruction and interaction using a moving depth camera. UIST , 2011. -
- [25][25] Guillaume Lample and Devendra Singh Chaplot. Playing FPS games with deep reinforcement learning. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2017. -
- [27][27] Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In ECCV , 2014. -
- [29][29] Lingni Ma, Jörg Stückler, Christian Kerl, and Daniel Cremers. Multi-view deep learning for consistent semantic mapping with rgb-d cameras. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages 598-605. IEEE, 2017. -
- [30][30] Piotr Mirowski, Razvan Pascanu, Fabio Viola, Hubert Soyer, Andrew J Ballard, Andrea Banino, Misha Denil, Ross Goroshin, Laurent Sifre, Koray Kavukcuoglu, et al. Learning to navigate in complex environments. ICLR , 2017. -
- [31][31] Arsalan Mousavian, Alexander Toshev, Marek Fišer, Jana Košecká, Ayzaan Wahid, and James Davidson. Visual representations for semantic target driven navigation. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 8846-8852. IEEE, 2019. -
- [32][32] Adithyavairavan Murali, Tao Chen, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Dhiraj Gandhi, Lerrel Pinto, Saurabh Gupta, and Abhinav Gupta. Pyrobot: An open-source robotics framework for research and benchmarking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08236 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [34][34] Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Soumith Chintala, Gregory Chanan, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Zeming Lin, Alban Desmaison, Luca Antiga, and Adam Lerer. Automatic differentiation in pytorch. NIPS 2017 Autodiff Workshop , 2017. -
- [35][35] Nikolay Savinov, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Vladlen Koltun. Semi-parametric topological memory for navigation. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2018. -
- [36][36] Nikolay Savinov, Anton Raichuk, Raphaël Marinier, Damien Vincent, Marc Pollefeys, Timothy Lillicrap, and Sylvain Gelly. Episodic curiosity through reachability. In ICLR , 2019. -
- [37][37] Manolis Savva, Angel X. Chang, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Thomas Funkhouser, and Vladlen Koltun. MINOS: Multimodal indoor simulator for navigation in complex environments. arXiv:1712.03931 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [38][38] Manolis Savva, Abhishek Kadian, Oleksandr Maksymets, Yili Zhao, Erik Wijmans, Bhavana Jain, Julian Straub, Jia Liu, Vladlen Koltun, Jitendra Malik, et al. Habitat: A platform for embodied ai research. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 9339-9347, 2019. -
- [40][40] James A Sethian. A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 93(4):1591-1595, 1996. -
- [41][41] Noah Snavely, Steven M Seitz, and Richard Szeliski. Modeling the world from internet photo collections. International journal of computer vision , 80(2):189-210, 2008. -
- [42][42] Erik Wijmans, Abhishek Kadian, Ari Morcos, Stefan Lee, Irfan Essa, Devi Parikh, Manolis Savva, and Dhruv Batra. Decentralized distributed ppo: Solving pointgoal navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00357 , 2019. - · arXiv
- [43][43] Mitchell Wortsman, Kiana Ehsani, Mohammad Rastegari, Ali Farhadi, and Roozbeh Mottaghi. Learning to learn how to learn: Self-adaptive visual navigation using meta-learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6750-6759, 2019. -
- [44][44] Yi Wu, Yuxin Wu, Aviv Tamar, Stuart Russell, Georgia Gkioxari, and Yuandong Tian. Learning and planning with a semantic model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10842 , 2018. - · arXiv
- [45][45] Fei Xia, Amir R. Zamir, Zhi-Yang He, Alexander Sax, Jitendra Malik, and Silvio Savarese. Gibson Env: real-world perception for embodied agents. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018 IEEE Conference on . IEEE, 2018 Gibson dataset license agreement available at https://storage.googleapis.com/gibson\_ material/Agreement%20GDS%2006-04-18.pdf. -
- [47][47] Wei Yang, Xiaolong Wang, Ali Farhadi, Abhinav Gupta, and Roozbeh Mottaghi. Visual semantic navigation using scene priors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06543 , 2018. - · arXiv
- [48][48] Liang Zhang, Leqi Wei, Peiyi Shen, Wei Wei, Guangming Zhu, and Juan Song. Semantic slam based on object detection and improved octomap. IEEE Access , 6:75545-75559, 2018. -
- [49][49] Yuke Zhu, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Eric Kolve, Joseph J Lim, Abhinav Gupta, Li Fei-Fei, and Ali Farhadi. Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning. In 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) , pages 3357-3364. IEEE, 2017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Embodied AI: From Simulators to Research Tasks
Duan, J., Yu, S., Tan, H. L., Zhu, H., & Tan, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2022.3141105 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
PONI: Potential Functions for ObjectGoal Navigation with Interaction-free Learning
Ramakrishnan, S. K., Chaplot, D. S., Al-Halah, Z., Malik, J., & Grauman, K. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01832 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationAuxiliary Tasks and Exploration Enable ObjectGoal Navigation
Ye, J., Batra, D., Das, A., & Wijmans, E. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01581 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
ETPNav: Evolving Topological Planning for Vision-Language Navigation in Continuous Environments
An, D., Wang, H., Wang, W., Wang, Z., Huang, Y., He, K., & Wang, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3386695 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Waypoint Models for Instruction-guided Navigation in Continuous Environments
Krantz, J., Gokaslan, A., Batra, D., Lee, S., & Maksymets, O. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01488 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Target-Driven Visual Navigation by Using Causal Intervention
Zhao, X., Wang, T., Li, Y., Zhang, B., Liu, K., Liu, D., Wang, C., & Snoussi, H. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2023.3288810 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Habitat-Web: Learning Embodied Object-Search Strategies from Human Demonstrations at Scale
Ramrakhya, R., Undersander, E., Batra, D., & Das, A. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00511 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
GridMM: Grid Memory Map for Vision-and-Language Navigation
Wang, Z., Li, X., Yang, J., Liu, Y., & Jiang, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01432 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
SayNav: Grounding Large Language Models for Dynamic Planning to Navigation in New Environments
Rajvanshi, A., Sikka, K., Lin, X., Lee, B., Chiu, H.-P., & Velasquez, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.04077 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Bridging Zero-shot Object Navigation and Foundation Models through Pixel-Guided Navigation Skill
Cai, W., Huang, S., Cheng, G., Long, Y., Gao, P., Sun, C., & Dong, H. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610499 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Memory-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Image-Goal Navigation
Mezghan, L., Sukhbaatar, S., Lavril, T., Maksymets, O., Batra, D., Bojanowski, P., & Alahari, K. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros47612.2022.9981090 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Navigating to Objects Specified by Images
Krantz, J., Gervet, T., Yadav, K., Wang, A., Paxton, C., Mottaghi, R., Batra, D., Malik, J., Lee, S., & Singh Chaplot, D. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01002 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
E-VAT: An Asymmetric End-to-End Approach to Visual Active Exploration and Tracking
Dionigi, A., Devo, A., Guiducci, L., & Costante, G. (2022) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3150866 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Transformer Memory for Interactive Visual Navigation in Cluttered Environments
Li, W., Hong, R., Shen, J., Yuan, L., & Lu, Y. (2023) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3241803 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Open-Ended Instructable Embodied Agents with Memory-Augmented Large Language Models
Sarch, G., Wu, Y., Tarr, M., & Fragkiadaki, K. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.226 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
GOAT-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Lifelong Navigation
Khanna, M., Ramrakhya, R., Chhablani, G., Yenamandra, S., Gervet, T., Chang, M., Kira, Z., Chaplot, D. S., Batra, D., & Mottaghi, R. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01549 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Modular navigation approaches have emerged as a popular paradigm for training policies for various Embodied AI tasks [7, 15, 20, 49–56].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHabitat 3.0: A Co-Habitat for Humans, Avatars, and Robots
Puig, X., Undersander, E., Szot, A., Cote, M. D., Yang, T.-Y., Partsey, R., Desai, R., Clegg, A. W., Hlavac, M., Min, S. Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13724 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“These scenarios have formed a solid foundation for embodied AI and have led to the development of new architectures (Chaplot et al., 2020; Brohan et al., 2023; Shah et al., 2023; Kotar et al., 2023), focus on data collection and offline evaluation rather than interactive evaluation.”
BackgroundSelf-citationPhone2Proc: Bringing Robust Robots into Our Chaotic World
Deitke, M., Hendrix, R., Farhadi, A., Ehsani, K., & Kembhavi, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00932 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Unsupervised Active Visual Search With Monte Carlo Planning Under Uncertain Detections
Taioli, F., Giuliari, F., Wang, Y., Berra, R., Castellini, A., Bue, A. D., Farinelli, A., Cristani, M., & Setti, F. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3451994 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
FLAR: A Unified Prototype Framework for Few-sample Lifelong Active Recognition
Fan, L., Xiong, P., Wei, W., & Wu, Y. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01511 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Active Open-Vocabulary Recognition: Let Intelligent Moving Mitigate CLIP Limitations
Fan, L., Zhou, J., Xing, X., & Wu, Y. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01551 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Active vision, a long-standing task driven by the goal of enabling agents to intelligently acquire visual observations, has been explored through various approaches [6, 17, 18, 30, 44].”
BackgroundSGoLAM: Simultaneous Goal Localization and Mapping for Multi-Object Goal Navigation
Kim, J., Lee, E. S., Lee, M., Zhang, D., & Kim, Y. M. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07171 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Brain-inspired spatial intelligence for embodied agents
Ruan, S., Wang, L., Kang, C., Zhu, Q., Liu, S., Wei, X., & Su, H. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74358-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Unbiased Embodied Visual Representation Learning with Causal Inference and Cross-Modality Alignment
Kang, J., Chen, B., Zhong, P., Wang, Y., Yang, H., & Sheng, Y. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications · doi:10.1145/3760261
- Authors
- Chaplot, D. S., Gandhi, D., Gupta, A., & Salakhutdinov, R.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Meta (Israel) (IL)
- ORCID
- Gupta, Abhinav
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 33
- Pages
- 4247-4258
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2007.00643
- OpenAlex
- W3102804550
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- neural information processing systems
- Funders
- Nvidia
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity
- Stanford Bio-X
- Office of Naval Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Keywords
- object-goal navigation, semantic exploration, goal-directed navigation, unknown environments, semantic priors, object arrangement, long-term planning, mobile robot navigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review