Cited by 0Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital literacy in education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Startup Intention to AI-Enabled Digital Execution: Modeling How Students Turn Business Ideas into Early Computational Action

Open access
Ta, Ngan Kim, Nguyen, Luan Trong·2025·Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This study examines how students convert AI driven entrepreneurial intention into early action by extending TPB/TAM with digital literacy. Here, “early action” is understood as early digital execution (EDE): whether students are already using AI-enabled computing tools to build, automate, and test parts of a business idea (e.g., generating market validation content with generative AI, automating simple workflows, assembling AI-assisted prototypes). Using a cross sectional survey of Vietnamese undergraduates and PLS-SEM, the study validates reliable constructs and strong model performance. The findings contribute to theory by integrating digital capability into TPB in the AI linked entrepreneurship context, while offering practical implications for universities to prioritize digital skills training, design learning and doing experiences with AI, and activate social and incubation networks to translate intention into action. Beyond theory, the paper proposes concrete computing design rules, pre-configured AI sandboxes, one-click automation starter kits, and short feedback-driven build sprints that operationalize the progression from Digital Literacy (DL), to Behavioral Intention (BI), and ultimately to Early Digital Execution (EA/EDE) as measurable digital execution rather than just aspiration. At a computational level, the study formalizes this mechanism as a structural model BI = f(PU, SN, DL) and EDE = f(BI), and estimates the corresponding path coefficients (β) using PLS-SEM with bootstrapped resampling. The main limitations concern the cross sectional design and sample scope; subsequent research should broaden the context and employ longitudinal tracking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3799457.3799611

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.63056/ACAD.004.03.0716 · DOI
  2. 10.1186/S13731-024-00412-5/TABLES/6 · DOI
  3. 10.3389/FPSYG.2020.546745/FULL · DOI
  4. 10.61242/IJABO.23.261 · DOI
  5. 10.2174/0118749445394456250605043155 · DOI
  6. 10.2196/14316 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1177/21582440251378790 · DOI
  8. “(PDF) The influence of entrepreneurial attitudes, subjective norms and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions.” Accessed: Oct. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355897911_The_influence_of_entrepreneurial_attitudes_subjective_norms_and_self-efficacy_on_entrepreneurial_intentions
  9. 10.36681/tused.2023.008 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/J.JIK.2025.100788 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2023.114480 · DOI
  12. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1007/S11747-014-0403-8/FIGURES/8 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_8 · DOI
  16. “A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) - Joseph F. Hair - Google Books.” Accessed: Oct. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com.vn/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IFiarYXE1PoC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=A+Primer+on+Partial+Least+Squares+Structural+Equation+Modeling+(PLS-SEM)&ots=phNAxX3iSM&sig=cl36X0SxGmvzOglfoe6OHpYMMpI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=series of analyses%2C which Exhibit 7.5 illustrates. The first step addresses the significance of the indirect effect (p1 · p2) via the mediator variable (Y2). If the indirect effect is not significant (right-hand side of Exhibit 7.5)%2C we conclude that Y2 does not function as a mediator in&f=false
  17. 10.3390/PSYCHOLINT7010013 · DOI
  18. 10.3390/SU15086907 · DOI
  19. 10.33122/IJOCE.V4I2.30 · DOI
  20. J. F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and S. P. Gudergan, “An overview of recent and emerging developments in PLS-SEM,” in Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, Springer, 2018, pp. 1-27.
  21. 10.1016/J.SSAHO.2024.101178 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/J.JIK.2025.100788 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2016.03.049 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E41413 · DOI
  25. 10.1055/S-0038-1668091 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002/REV3.3462 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ta, N. K., & Nguyen, L. T.
Affiliations
FPT University (VN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM
Published
2025-12-12
Pages
938-945
OpenAlex
W7161284144
Cited by
0
References
3
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence (ICIEAI) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
Keywords
entrepreneurial intention, digital literacy, theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, behavioral intention, generative AI, business idea validation, automation, digital skills training, university entrepreneurship, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Startup Intention to AI-Enabled Digital Execution: Modeling How Students Turn Business Ideas into Early Computational Action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3799457.3799611
The paper
Ta, N. K., & Nguyen, L. T. (2025). From Startup Intention to AI-Enabled Digital Execution: Modeling How Students Turn Business Ideas into Early Computational Action. Proceedings of the 2025 3rd International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1145/3799457.3799611