The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research challenges in wireless networks of biomedical sensors
Abstract
Implanted biomedical devices ha ve the potential to revo-lutionize medicine. Smart sensors, whic hare created by combining sensing materials with integrated circuitry, are being considered for several biomedical applications such as a glucose level monitor or a retina prosthesis. These devices require the capability to communicate with an external com-puter system (base station) via a wireless interface. The lim-ited pow erand computational capabilities of smart sensor based biological implants presen t research challenges in sev-eral aspects of wireless netw orking due to the need for having a bio-compatible, fault-tolerant, energy-eÆcient, and scal-able design. Further, em bedding thesesensors in humans add additional requirements. For example, the wireless net-w orking solutions should be ultra-safe and reliable, w ork trouble-free in dierent geographical locations (although im-plants are typically not expected to move; they shouldn't restrict the movements of their human host), and require minimal maintenance. This necessitates application-specic solutions which are vastly dierent from traditional solu-tions. In this paper, w e describe the potential of biomedical smart sensors. We then explain the challenges for wire-less netw orking of human-embedded smart sensor arrays and our preliminary approach for wireless netw orking of a retina prosthesis. Our aim is to motivate vigorous research in this area by illustrating the need for more application-specic and novel approaches tow ard developing wireless network-ing solutions for human-implanted smart sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smart wearable systems: Current status and future challenges
Chan, M., Estève, D., Fourniols, J.-Y., Escriba, C., & Campo, E. (2012) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2012.09.003 · Cited by 953
VBF: Vector-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks
Xie, P., Cui, J.-H., & Lao, L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11753810_111 · Cited by 788
An overview of the Internet of Things for people with disabilities
Domingo, M. C. (2012) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2011.10.015 · Cited by 638
Wearable and implantable wireless sensor network solutions for healthcare monitoring
Darwish, A., & Hassanien, A. E. (2011) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s110605561 · Cited by 556
Wireless body sensor networks for health-monitoring applications
Hao, Y., & Foster, R. (2008) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/11/r01 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwiebert, L., Gupta, S. K. S., & Weinmann, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2001-07-16
- Pages
- 151-165
- ISSN
- 1543-5679 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978679868
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.37
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research challenges in wireless networks of biomedical sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/381677.381692
- The paper
- Schwiebert, L., Gupta, S. K. S., & Weinmann, J. (2001). Research challenges in wireless networks of biomedical sensors. Proceedings of the 7th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. https://doi.org/10.1145/381677.381692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.