The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet
Abstract
Over the past decade, mobile computing and wireless communication have become increasingly important drivers of many new computing applications. The field of wireless sensor networks particularly focuses on applications involving autonomous use of compute, sensing, and wireless communication devices for both scientific and commercial purposes. This paper examines the research decisions and design tradeoffs that arise when applying wireless peer-to-peer networking techniques in a mobile sensor network designed to support wildlife tracking for biology research.The ZebraNet system includes custom tracking collars (nodes) carried by animals under study across a large, wild area; the collars operate as a peer-to-peer network to deliver logged data back to researchers. The collars include global positioning system (GPS), Flash memory, wireless transceivers, and a small CPU; essentially each node is a small, wireless computing device. Since there is no cellular service or broadcast communication covering the region where animals are studied, ad hoc, peer-to-peer routing is needed. Although numerous ad hoc protocols exist, additional challenges arise because the researchers themselves are mobile and thus there is no fixed base station towards which to aim data. Overall, our goal is to use the least energy, storage, and other resources necessary to maintain a reliable system with a very high `data homing' success rate. We plan to deploy a 30-node ZebraNet system at the Mpala Research Centre in central Kenya. More broadly, we believe that the domain-centric protocols and energy tradeoffs presented here for ZebraNet will have general applicability in other wireless and sensor applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Cited by
Opportunistic networking: data forwarding in disconnected mobile ad hoc networks
Pelusi, L., Passarella, A., & Conti, M. (2006) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2006.248176 · Cited by 1,163
Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research
Tomkiewicz, S. M., Fuller, M. R., Kie, J. G., & Bates, K. K. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0090 · Cited by 528
Heuristic Congestion Control for Message Deletion in Delay Tolerant Network
Leela-amornsin, L., & Esaki, H. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14891-0_26 · Cited by 19
Krishnaveni, P., & Sutha, J. (2022) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-019-01668-6 · Cited by 14
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Juang, P., Oki, H., Wang, Y., Martonosi, M., Peh, L. S., & Rubenstein, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2002-10
- Pages
- 96-107
- OpenAlex
- W2123825896
- Cited by
- 1,804
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/605397.605408
- The paper
- Juang, P., Oki, H., Wang, Y., Martonosi, M., Peh, L. S., & Rubenstein, D. (2002). Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/605397.605408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.