The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-prover interactive proofs: how to remove intractability
Abstract
Quite complex cryptographic machinery has been developed based on the assumption that one-way functions exist, yet we know of only a few possible such candidates. It is important at this time to find alternative foundations to the design of secure cryptography. We introduce a new model of generalized interactive proofs as a step in this direction. We prove that all NP languages have perfect zero-knowledge proof-systems in this model, without making any intractability assumptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Wigderson, A. (1987) · Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM conference on Theory of computing - STOC '87 · doi:10.1145/28395.28420 · Cited by 3,590
Cited by
Some optimal inapproximability results
Håstad, J. (2001) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/502090.502098 · Cited by 1,902
Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems
Blum, M., Luby, M., & Rubinfeld, R. (1993) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(93)90044-w · Cited by 712
Checking computations in polylogarithmic time
Babai, L., Fortnow, L., Levin, L. A., & Szegedy, M. (1991) · Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '91 · doi:10.1145/103418.103428 · Cited by 616
Micali, S. (2000) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539795284959 · Cited by 424
Function-Based Access Control (FBAC): Towards Preventing Insider Threats in Organizations
Desmedt, Y., & Shaghaghi, A. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04834-1_8 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Ben-Or, M., Goldwasser, S., Kilian, J., & Widgerson, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '88
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1988
- Pages
- 113-131
- OpenAlex
- W2080578129
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-prover interactive proofs: how to remove intractability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/62212.62223
- The paper
- Ben-Or, M., Goldwasser, S., Kilian, J., & Widgerson, A. (1988). Multi-prover interactive proofs: how to remove intractability. Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '88. https://doi.org/10.1145/62212.62223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.