The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting
Abstract
This paper reports on a project to develop a “work in preparation” editor, or PREP editor, to study co-authoring and commenting relationships. As part of the project, we have identified three issues in designing computer support for co-authoring and commenting: (1) support for social interaction among co-authors and commenters; (2) support for cognitive aspects of co-authoring and external commenting; and (3) support for practicality in both types of interaction. For each of these issues, the paper describes the approach the PREP editor takes to address them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b15703 · Cited by 3,132
Identifying the organization of writing processes
Haves, J. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,553
Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings
Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D. G., Kahn, K., Lanning, S., & Suchman, L. (1987) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/7885.7887 · Cited by 1,031
Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces
Grudin, J. (1988) · Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '88 · doi:10.1145/62266.62273 · Cited by 961
Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research
Kling, R. (1980) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/356802.356806 · Cited by 783
Agre, P. E., & Chapman, D. (1990) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(05)80026-0 · Cited by 372
Halasz, F. G., Moran, T. P., & Trigg, R. H. (1986) · ACM SIGCHI Bulletin · doi:10.1145/1165387.30859 · Cited by 340
Gould, J. D. (1987) · Human–Computer Interaction–INTERACT '87 · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-70304-0.50010-8 · Cited by 330
Writing Groups: History, Theory, and Implications
Clark, B. L., & Gere, A. R. (1988) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357833 · Cited by 320
Greif, I., & Sarin, S. (1987) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/27636.27640 · Cited by 225
Cited by
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504
Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces
Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992) · Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '92 · doi:10.1145/143457.143468 · Cited by 2,550
Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems
Bellotti, V., & Edwards, K. (2001) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci16234_05 · Cited by 471
Research on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997) · Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50125-4 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuwirth, C. M., Kaufer, D. S., Chandhok, R., & Morris, J. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '90
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1990
- Pages
- 183-195
- OpenAlex
- W2082954984
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/99332.99354
- The paper
- Neuwirth, C. M., Kaufer, D. S., Chandhok, R., & Morris, J. H. (1990). Issues in the design of computer support for co-authoring and commenting. Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '90. https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99354
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
