The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research
Abstract
article Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research Share on Author: Rob Kling Department of Information and Computer Science and Public Policy Research Organization, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California Department of Information and Computer Science and Public Policy Research Organization, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CaliforniaView Profile Authors Info & Claims ACM Computing SurveysVolume 12Issue 1March 1980 pp 61–110https://doi.org/10.1145/356802.356806Online:01 March 1980Publication History 495citation5,330DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations495Total Downloads5,330Last 12 Months97Last 6 weeks19 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, Kling [19801 describes how different perspectives (such as rational, structural, and political) on the use of information systems in organizations each illuminate aspects of reality neglected by the others.”
From The interdisciplinary study of coordination (1994) · cites this paper as Kling 1980
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement
Swanson, E. B. (1974) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.21.2.178 · Cited by 529
Dutton, W. H., & Kraemer, K. L. (1980) · Society · doi:10.1007/bf02700058 · Cited by 20
Cited by
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 · Cited by 3,879
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504
Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1999) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.1999.5387096 · Cited by 3,498
Metadata
- Authors
- Kling, R.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-110
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2144124724
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 92.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/356802.356806
- The paper
- Kling, R. (1980). Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/356802.356806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
