CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Digital Archaeology

Morgan, Colleen·2022·Annual Review of Anthropology
DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-114101
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Digital archaeology is both a pervasive practice and a unique subdiscipline within archaeology. The diverse digital methods and tools employed by archaeologists have led to a proliferation of innovative practice that has fundamentally reconfigured the discipline. Rather than reviewing specific technologies, this review situates digital archaeology within broader theoretical debates regarding craft and embodiment; materiality; the uncanny; and ethics, politics, and accessibility. A future digital archaeology must move beyond skeuomorphic submission and replication of previous structural inequalities to foment new archaeological imaginaries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-114101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If there is any unifying feature of humanity or hominins more broadly, it is creativity.

    “If there is any unifying feature of humanity (or indeed of hominins more broadly), it is our creativity (Frieman, 2021, 166-83;Morgan, 2022).”

    From Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures (2024) · cites this paper as Morgan, 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 156

  1. Anichini F, 2020, Internet Archaeol, 52
  2. 10.29311/mas.v19i2.3844 · DOI
  3. 10.31356/dpb008 · DOI
  4. 10.15184/aqy.2021.84 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/345321 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Basel Action Netw., Silicon Valley Toxics Coalit, 2002, Exporting harm: the high-tech trashing of Asia
  7. Beacham R, 2006, London Charter
  8. Beale G, 2017, Internet Archaeol, 44, 62
  9. 10.1558/jca.33422 · DOI
  10. Bergman C, 2017, Joyful Militancy: Building Thriving Resistance in Toxic Times
  11. 10.1177/1469605318759713 · DOI
  12. 10.1558/jca.33560 · DOI
  13. Boutin A, 2013, Colleen Morgan Blog
  14. Braidotti R., 1997, Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory, 59
  15. Braidotti R., 2013, The Posthuman
  16. 10.1177/1474474019890319 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s10816-012-9133-8 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/oso/9780198748519.001.0001 · DOI
  19. Brughmans T, 2018, Computer Applications & Quantitative Methods in Archaeology
  20. Buchli V, 2001, Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past, 158
  21. 10.1147/sj.284.0548 · DOI
  22. 10.4324/9780429324154-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1017/eaa.2019.15 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110344 · DOI
  25. 10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521 · DOI
  26. Chrysanthi A, 2012, Thinking Beyond the Tool: Archaeological Computing and the Interpretive Process
  27. 10.1515/opar-2019-0010 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1649-8_2 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/aman.12826 · DOI
  30. 10.1017/eaa.2019.23 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/1750-0206.12413 · DOI
  32. 10.3389/fdigh.2016.00004 · DOI
  33. 10.1017/eaa.2019.21 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jas.2021.105433 · DOI
  35. Deleuze G, 1987, A Thousand Plateaus
  36. Delgado Anés L, 2017, III Congreso de La Sociedad Internacional Humanidades Digitales Hispánicas: Sociedades, Políticas, Saberes (Libro de Resúmenes), 293
  37. Dennis LM., 2016, SAA Archaeol. Record, 16, 29
  38. Dennis LM., 2020, J. Comput. Appl. Archaeol., 3, 210
  39. Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco P, 2018, Authenticity and Cultural Heritage in the Age of 3D Digital Reproductions
  40. 10.3390/su11051373 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.003 · DOI
  42. Ellis SJR. 2016. Are we ready for new (digital) ways to record archaeological fieldwork? A case study from Pompeii. See Averett et al. 2016, pp. 51–75
  43. Evans TL, 2004, Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory
  44. 10.30861/9781407312910 · DOI
  45. 10.4324/9781315666273-21 · DOI
  46. 10.1515/opar-2018-0007 · DOI
  47. Ferraby R., 2017, Internet Archaeol, 571
  48. Finn C., 2002, Artifacts: An Archaeologist's Year in Silicon Valley
  49. 10.1179/iar.2003.25.2.119 · DOI
  50. Flexner J., 2009, Archaeol. Rev. Camb., 24, 7
  51. 10.1017/S1380203820000203 · DOI
  52. 10.4995/var.2011.4543 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/00293652.2020.1738540 · DOI
  54. Freud S., 1957, The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 17, 218
  55. 10.1080/00438240601133816 · DOI
  56. 10.1086/697489 · DOI
  57. Gardner A, 2021, Camb. Archaeol. J., 31, 10.1017/S0959774321000196 · DOI
  58. 10.2307/j.ctv1xz0wz · DOI
  59. 10.4324/9781351243858 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s10761-019-00535-6 · DOI
  61. 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045825 · DOI
  62. 10.1179/2159032X13Z.0000000007 · DOI
  63. Graham S, 2020, Internet Archaeol, 55
  64. 10.2307/j.ctv21hrg7r · DOI
  65. Graham S, 2019, The Open Digital Archaeology Textbook
  66. 10.1080/00293652.2011.629808 · DOI
  67. 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095946 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s10816-016-9298-7 · DOI
  69. 10.1080/00293652.2017.1393456 · DOI
  70. Haraway D., 1985, Soc. Rev., 80, 65
  71. 10.1215/9780822373780 · DOI
  72. 10.1007/s11759-018-9348-8 · DOI
  73. 10.1353/con.1993.0003 · DOI
  74. 10.1162/LEON_a_00438 · DOI
  75. Hollinger RE, 2013, Mus. Anthropol. Rev., 7, 201
  76. 10.11141/ia.52.5 · DOI
  77. 10.1515/opar-2015-0002 · DOI
  78. Huggett J., 2017, Internet Archaeol, 44
  79. Huggett J, 2018, J. Comput. Appl. Archaeol., 1, 42
  80. 10.4324/9781315225272 · DOI
  81. Huvila I, 2018, J. Comput. Appl. Archaeol., 1, 88
  82. 10.1017/S1380203807002127 · DOI
  83. 10.29311/mas.v19i2.3663 · DOI
  84. 10.1086/683296 · DOI
  85. 10.4324/9781003139324-15 · DOI
  86. 10.1515/opar-2015-0008 · DOI
  87. 10.29311/mas.v19i2.3583 · DOI
  88. 10.1080/00438243.2017.1406399 · DOI
  89. 10.14434/sdh.v2i1.24590 · DOI
  90. 10.4324/9780203451076 · DOI
  91. Lowenthal D., 1985, The Past Is a Foreign Country
  92. Marwick B, 2017, SAA Archaeol. Record, 17, 8
  93. Maxwell R, 2013, The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World, 699
  94. 10.1080/00934690.2020.1713283 · DOI
  95. 10.1007/s10814-009-9030-1 · DOI
  96. 10.1016/j.culher.2022.01.001 · DOI
  97. Mol A., 2019, Shores of Time
  98. 10.1017/eaa.2019.42 · DOI
  99. Morgan C., 2012, Emancipatory digital archaeology
  100. 10.1017/eaa.2019.22 · DOI
  101. 10.15184/aqy.2021.125 · DOI
  102. Morgan C., 2021, Forum Krit. Archäol., 10, 1
  103. 10.1080/00438243.2012.741810 · DOI
  104. 10.1080/00934690.2021.1985304 · DOI
  105. 10.1080/00934690.2018.1428488 · DOI
  106. Morgan CL., 2016, Internet Archaeol, 2, 50
  107. 10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1179/pua.2006.5.2.91 · DOI
  109. Moshenska G., 2014, Post-Medieval Archaeol, 48, 255
  110. Newland C., 2004, A historical archaeology of mobile phones in the UK
  111. 10.1007/s10761-019-00526-7 · DOI · Paper page
  112. 10.1515/opar-2020-0218 · DOI
  113. 10.1515/opar-2020-0138 · DOI
  114. 10.1007/s10816-016-9310-2 · DOI
  115. 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013845 · DOI
  116. Parikka J., 2012, What Is Media Archaeology?
  117. 10.1558/jca.v2i1.27110 · DOI
  118. 10.1007/s10814-019-09127-8 · DOI
  119. Perry S, 2015, Material Evidence: Learning from Archaeological Practice, 189
  120. 10.1017/eaa.2019.24 · DOI
  121. 10.1558/jca.v2i1.27083 · DOI
  122. Perry S, 2018, Oceans of Data: Proceedings of the 44th Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 11, 10.2307/jj.15135958.5 · DOI
  123. 10.1558/jca.v2i1.27134 · DOI
  124. 10.1080/13527258.2011.577796 · DOI
  125. Rabinowitz A. 2016. Response: Mobilizing (ourselves) for a critical digital archaeology. See Averett et al. 2016, pp. 493–520
  126. Reilly P, 1990, Computer Applications in Archaeology, 132
  127. 10.1515/opar-2020-0143 · DOI
  128. Reilly P, 2016, Digit. Appl. Archaeol. Cult. Heritage, 3, 33
  129. 10.2307/j.ctvw04bb5 · DOI
  130. Richardson L-J., 2018, J. Comput. Appl. Archaeol., 1, 64
  131. 10.1007/978-3-319-42870-3_15 · DOI
  132. 10.1017/S1380203820000240 · DOI
  133. Robb J., 2021, Internet Archaeol, 56
  134. 10.37911/9781947864382 · DOI
  135. 10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004 · DOI
  136. 10.1145/3290605.3300857 · DOI
  137. 10.14434/sdh.v4i2.31520 · DOI
  138. 10.4324/9780203068632.ch7 · DOI
  139. 10.1017/S1380203820000239 · DOI
  140. 10.1177/1469605320937530 · DOI
  141. 10.1558/jca.v2i1.27119 · DOI
  142. 10.1080/00182370.2020.1723968 · DOI
  143. 10.1515/opar-2020-0145 · DOI
  144. Taylor J, 2018, Internet Archaeol, 94, 57
  145. 10.1007/s10761-019-00534-7 · DOI
  146. 10.5876/9781607323815.c002 · DOI
  147. 10.1017/eaa.2019.20 · DOI
  148. 10.1016/j.culher.2022.01.008 · DOI
  149. 10.1007/s11759-018-9346-x · DOI
  150. Van Meter P, 2013, Learning Through Visual Displays, 247
  151. 10.1007/s11759-017-9325-7 · DOI
  152. 10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.31 · DOI
  153. 10.14236/ewic/EVA2020.10 · DOI
  154. 10.1007/s11759-020-09399-3 · DOI
  155. 10.1201/b12806 · DOI
  156. 10.1177/1469605309104138 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Morgan, C.
Affiliations
Department of Archaeology, The University of York, York, United Kingdom;
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2022-10-24
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
213-231
ISSN
  • 0084-6570
  • 1545-4290
DOI
10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-114101
Cited by
51
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review